Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge puts temporary stop to Linn State's Drug Testing Program

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Harry J Asslinger Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-11 12:34 PM
Original message
Judge puts temporary stop to Linn State's Drug Testing Program
At the ACLU's request.

http://www.aclu.org/blog/criminal-law-reform/judge-temporarily-halts-colleges-unlawful-drug-testing-program

Taking swift action, a federal district court judge last night granted an ACLU request and temporarily halted an unconstitutional policy at a public college in Missouri requiring all incoming students to submit to mandatory drug tests. Judge Nanette K. Laughrey ordered officials at Linn State Technical College in Jefferson City, Mo., to stop analyzing urine specimens that have already been collected and to instruct the drug testing company not to release any results it may have already compiled.

The orders came just a few hours after the ACLU and ACLU of Eastern Missouri filed suit in federal court to stop the college from drug testing its students without any suspicion of wrongdoing, arguing that the policy violated the students' Fourth Amendment rights.

Linn State officials last week began removing students from class in small groups in order to collect a urine sample for drug screening, for which students were forced to pay $50. Mind you, we are talking about adults over the age of 18 who have committed no crime, and whom the college has stated they do not suspect of drug use. But that did not matter to school officials, as student after student was treated with suspicion and as if they had broken the law.

In conversations with the ACLU, Linn State claimed that, as a technical college, their students operate heavy machinery and that, as a result, drug testing served as a way to help keep them safe. Not quite. The truth is that not a single one of our six plaintiffs operates heavy machinery as part of their academic training. They are enrolled in programs like Electronics Engineering Technology and Design Drafting Technology, and merely want to be able to go to school and earn a degree without being treated as if they have broken the law.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-11 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Genealogist Donating Member (495 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-11 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lionessa Donating Member (842 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-11 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Even if it were to be only for those students that do operate heavy machinery
unless they have some compelling evidence that they have a concerning level of accidents and/or accidents are the results of drug usage, I'd say they still don't have a leg to stand on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-11 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. IMO this is one of the fastest growing violations of civil rights in our
nation by both the private sector and the government. Hopefully they will legalize or at least decriminalize pot. That would stop a lot of the abuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC