Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Supreme Court stopped Rick Perry from committing another murder last night

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Cyrano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-11 12:06 PM
Original message
The Supreme Court stopped Rick Perry from committing another murder last night
Did I say murder? Sorry, "execution."

We are still the only "civilized" country in the world that has the death penalty. It has been banned in almost all of Europe, and in Japan and Canada.

Anyhow, I guess a bad night for Governor Perry is a good night for human decency. Then again, he may not have heard about it since he was off to a fund raiser someplace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Blue Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-11 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Are the Tea Cretins booing yet?
We all know how depressed the party of life gets when other people don't die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Llewlladdwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-11 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. A State authorized execution is not a murder. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrDiaz Donating Member (365 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-11 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Are you talking about the
Man who murdered a child's mother in front of her and the man she was with? If so, I completly disagree with you, this man deserves what he should have got.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mysuzuki2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-11 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Oh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-11 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. If a state tortured you into signing a false confession for a crime you didn't commit and ...
... executed you would you consider that murder?

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Llewlladdwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-11 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Is that what happened in this case? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-11 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Why did you avoid answering my question?
Edited on Fri Sep-16-11 01:02 PM by NNN0LHI
Lets get these questions done one at a time so we don't have any confusion during this chat.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Llewlladdwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-11 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Because it is meaningless.
We could play 'what if' games all day. The fact of the matter is that your hypothetical has no relation to this particular case. The accused was tried, found guilty and sentenced to death in accordance with US jurisprudence. Under US law such a killing is not murder.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HERVEPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-11 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. It is a state-sponsored and approved murder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Llewlladdwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-11 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Familiar with Lewis Carroll?
“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.”

That would appear to be your attitude as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cyrano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-11 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I'm familiar with the quote, Llewlladdwr
And I also call capital punishment "state-sponsored and approved murder."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Llewlladdwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-11 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. You are free to do so...
but that doesn't make it true. Murder is very explicitly defined in the legal codes of the states and the Federal governments. An execution does not meet the definition of murder in those codes. Ergo, an execution is not a murder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cyrano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-11 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. That's a lawyer's argument. It doesn't meet any standard of human morality or decency I know of.
Edited on Fri Sep-16-11 12:51 PM by Cyrano
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Llewlladdwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-11 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. While I agree that most lawyers are devoid of morality...
the fact remains that murder has a very specifically defined meaning. It has to in order to determine when it is proper to impose severe legal sanctions on an individual. If you define any killing of another human being as murder then an individual who accidentally causes a death is just as much a murderer as John Wayne Gacy or Henry Lee Lucas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cyrano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-11 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Well, according to your "very specifically defined meaning" of murder, I guess it
Edited on Fri Sep-16-11 01:03 PM by Cyrano
applies more to black people than to white people. The statistics of how the death penalty is applied in this country would show what I've just said to be a true statement.

Anyhow, twist it as you will. I'm outta here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-11 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. What did Lewis Carroll say about appeals to authority?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Llewlladdwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-11 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. I have no idea.
I didn't really intend this as an appeal to authority, since I don't believe Lewis Carroll to be authoritative on legal questions like this. He did, however, have a talent for phrasing things much better than I can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-11 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good...you know he would not ahve intervened, the asshole...good
for the SCOTUS...rare that we can praise them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-11 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
19. Executionis interruptus
Sorry about your inability to achieve gore-gasm, teabaggers. Not really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC