Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House 'rushed' loan to solar firm Solyndra

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 05:37 PM
Original message
White House 'rushed' loan to solar firm Solyndra
Edited on Thu Sep-15-11 05:44 PM by nadinbrzezinski
The White House could have rushed approval on a major government-backed loan to a failed solar panel firm for political reasons, say US Republicans.

Solyndra declared bankruptcy this month after laying off 1,100 workers, and was then raided by the FBI.

The company came to prominence when President Barack Obama visited it in May 2010 to promote green business.

The White House denied the loan had been rushed so that Vice-President Joe Biden could attend a groundbreak event.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-14923431

And timeline

Solyndra: Advanced by Bush for 2 Years (Solyndra Timeline)

It’s often claimed that the Solyndra loan guarantee was “rushed through” by the Obama Administration for political reasons. In fact, the Solyndra loan guarantee was a multi-year process that the Bush Administration launched in 2007.
You’d never know from the media coverage that:
The Bush team tried to conditionally approve the Solyndra loan just before President Obama took office.
The company’s backers included private investors who had diverse political interests.
The loan comprises just 1.3% of DOE’s overall loan portfolio. To date, Solyndra is the only loan that’s known to be troubled.
Source: Clean Technica (http://s.tt/13giD)

Comment: http://posterous.com/#spaces/nadinbrzezinski/posts/70490165
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's what happens when Repukes control the House...they get to hold high-profile
witch hunts, er, hearings.

That said, I wouldn't be surprised if they did rush it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. This sucks -- for ALL concerned. Why can't these rich fucks
do some "job creating" with their tax money not paid in taxes, and invest in these companies? Isn't that how it's supposed to work?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Check the time line
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. So are they blaming the Bush administration? (Not the Republicans,
we KNOW they're blaming Obama -- those who are investigating.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. The loan process began prior to 2009
On Jan 12th, 2009 the DOE Credit Committee kicked Solyndra's application back because it didn't provide enough information, including an independent market study. On January 26th, the DOE restarted the approval process. On March 14th, the DOE gave the loan conditional approval without the additional information.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. they'll make this a scandal if they can
FoxNews is on it, no doubt.

If Boehner can use it to impeach, no matter how absurd, don't bet against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Check time line
but yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. +1 but Neg rec'd. I guess there are people out there who did not check the timeline...
Edited on Thu Sep-15-11 05:51 PM by Gold Metal Flake
...or did and found it looked bad for their guy. You know, the last guy.

Thanks for trying, again.

ETA: I rec'd. Still zero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. You know, regs or not... don't care
:-)

But since the timeline did not strictly come from a nooz site.


:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. The timeline
Isn't a winning point in this case.

The email memos tell more of the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
11. why wouldn't republicans say that? it's a fucking opinion.
i call bullshit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. Here's an article on how it is a phony scandal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBigotBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. K&R
Lots of Bush fans around as still at zero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC