Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Update: 'Is White House Really Backing Away From Push For full Jobs Bill?' - WaPo

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 05:23 PM
Original message
Update: 'Is White House Really Backing Away From Push For full Jobs Bill?' - WaPo
Is White House really backing away from push for full jobs bill?
By Greg Sargent - WaPo
Posted at 02:21 PM ET, 09/13/2011

<snip>

It’s being widely reported that White House economic adviser Gene Sperling contradicted Obama’s jobs message today when he told reporters that Obama would sign into law any portions of the American Jobs Act that House Republicans pass.

Sperling’s assertions do suggest that the White House doesn’t have its messaging ducks in a row, and will give opponents ammo to argue that the White House has flip-flopped on its vow to push for the full American Jobs Act. But I’m not sure they have all that much substantive significance.

<And...>

Folks are arguing that this contradicts David Axelrod’s vow earlier today that Obama and his team do not see the jobs bill as an “a la carte menu.” I think this was an unfortunate quote from Sperling — rather than speculating on what Obama might do if House GOPers pass parts of the bill, he could have refused to speculate and reiterated nothing more than the White House’s desire to see the full bill passed. There’s no need to muddy the message about what you’re willing to accept.

<And...>

UPDATE: In fairness to Sperling, it’s not his fault that what he said today seemed to jar with Axelrod's quotes from this morning. Sperling was echoing what the President himself said yesterday about signing parts of the bill if the House GOP passes them, a message that was also voiced by White House press secretary Jay Carney today.

<snip>

Link: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/post/is-white-house-really-backing-away-from-push-for-full-jobs-bill/2011/03/03/gIQAd72yPK_blog.html

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, don't worry
They'll get all of the Republican priorities through and let the rest die.

After all, "we don't have the votes."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cool Logic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. I do not understand why there is a question--Obama will take whatever he can get...
But like Mick Jagger said: "You can't always get what you want."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Well...if past performance is a clue,
Obama will take whatever the Republicans TELL him he can get
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. And Democrats can't get anything they want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newblewtoo Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. I voted for Obama
And ended up with Rusty Warren, "Roll me over, lay me down and do it again". I was hoping more for "I won't back down."

This is getting depressing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. Rest assured those new trade agreements will pass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC