Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OK! - Obama plan: raise taxes on wealthy to pay for jobs creation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-11 02:43 PM
Original message
OK! - Obama plan: raise taxes on wealthy to pay for jobs creation
White House Office of Management and Budget Director Jack Lew on Monday outlined plans to pay for President Obama's new jobs bill largely by increasing taxes on the wealthiest Americans and closing tax loopholes for businesses.

Most of the new funds, Lew said, would be attained by limiting itemized deductions for individuals making more than $200,000 a year and families making more than $250,000, a plan President Obama has tried to push since his campaign days. Taking these steps would raise roughly $400 billion over 10 years, Lew said.

"We have choices to make. In order to invest in jobs and growth, we're going to have to pay for it," Lew said. "We think the American people will think this is the right package."

The administration also include a long-time policy goal of taxing the income investment fund managers make, known as carried interest, as regular income instead of as capital gains, which has a lower 15 percent tax rate. So far, Wall Street has strongly resisted any attempt to increase the rate on so-called carried interest. That change alone, would provide an infusion of $18 billion in revenue, according to administration officials.

The elimination of a tax break for the oil and gas industry would raise another $40 billion, and another $3 billion would come from changing the way corporate jets depreciate. Combined with a few other smaller revenue raises, Lew said the total measures proposed by the administration would bring in $467 billion, with some "wiggle room" -- $20 billion more than the cost of Obama's jobs bill, to ensure there's room to account for Congress' bean counters score the total a bit differently.

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/09/white-house-says-tax-cuts-on-wealthy-will-largely-pay-for-jobs-bill.php?ref=fpb
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/09/12/1016196/-Obama-plan:-raise-taxes-on-wealthy-to-pay-for-jobs-creation?via=blog_1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-11 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-11 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. And/or he could try dealing with this in a meaningful way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-11 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. So they are going to put in all the things the Republicans have stopped twice?
I hope it goes through but I am not holding my breath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-11 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Okay, a decent proposal
Not perfect, but I'll take it if these details are correct, or close to correct.

Now comes the heavy lifting part. I've seen an administration with atrophied muscles when it comes to pushing against the right (pushing away the left, they're hypertrophied). What sort of follow-through are we going to see? What kind of public relations work will they put out on the broadcast and cable channels? Because if this idea is just pushed out of the nest to fly on its own, the popular media will just run their usual parade of conservatives to devour this fledgling with nary a burp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-11 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. Welfare for the wealthy should have been suspended years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tennessee Gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-11 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. "Welfare for the Wealthy"
That is an excellent way to put it!

Mind if I use it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-11 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Wealthfare? n/t
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tennessee Gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-11 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. That's a good one, too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-11 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. It's not mine. Use it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessionalLeftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-11 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. I support that.n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DirkGently Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-11 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. A worthy start, if Republicans will permit it. Ending the Bush tax cuts would raise double that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-11 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. k&r....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tennessee Gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-11 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
12. This needs to be kicked so that people will read it.
Some here on another thread are asking cuts in what. This answers it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theaocp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-11 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
13. and/or
Edited on Mon Sep-12-11 04:35 PM by theaocp
pull off the toes of their children. Maybe then they'd start seeing "reason". :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-11 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
14. Good on him.
I wish I could just say hooray without having to add the word "finally".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-11 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. K&R. Yes please!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-11 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
17. I support this,
...and hope he shows up for the fight.

If he fights for me,
I'll return the favor.
If this goes away like the Public Option,
count me out for 2012.

You will know them by their WORKS,
not by their excuses or promises.

Solidarity!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC