Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

America WAS Attacked on the Anniversary - Cover-Up?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
democrat2thecore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 02:57 PM
Original message
America WAS Attacked on the Anniversary - Cover-Up?
Edited on Sun Sep-11-11 03:06 PM by democrat2thecore
I have been supportive of the 9-11 memorials, have defended the coverage, etc. in other threads. However, I have been reading some disturbing news and even more disturbing news in the comments on CNN....

PLEASE PAY ATTENTION & READ THIS.......

Less than 24 hours ago, a suicide bomber drove a truck into a NATO outpost in Afghanistan. 77 U.S. troops were said to have be injured. The news has reported this - but barely. On their websites mostly. The coverage of the 9/11 anniversary has been mum on this attack. Here's the most troubling part of this...family members are frantically trying to get information about the incident, but have been met with what they are calling a "wall of silence." No communications (emails, calls, etc.) are being allowed out of this base in eastern Afghanistan. They have resorted to news comment threads to try to get answers. The only official comments are that "it appears" that none of the injuries are life threatening.

Is it possible that the blackout on information to the families is because this 9/11 weekend anniversary attack on U.S. troops may have been more deadly than they are saying? Could it be that all of these ceremonies would have been ruined if the news was that, in fact, their had been a successful attack killing 77 U.S. troops in Afghanistan? Can you imagine what this would "look like" if, in fact, dozens and dozens of U.S. troops were killed on the anniversary weekend? They would all have to be referencing the "tragedy in Afghanistan" and it would put a pall over everything.

Seriously, this doesn't look right, sound right, and by the writings of the pleas from the families, I am not the least bit convinced that America wasn't successfully attacked in this truck bombing in Afghanistan. Actually, it's clear there was an attack - but are we being told the truth as to how "successful" it was?

I am going to try to get more information from some people I know to find out if this attack has not been blacked out until after 9/11 so as to not make it look like there was a successful retaliation on the anniversary weekend. I have a few contacts and I'm going to work on getting in touch with them now. I wanted to post this as quickly as possible to DU so that others, who might have contacts, can see what they can find out. I just don't like the looks of this. Thank you to fellow DUers...............

Please try to keep this near the top in case somebody can help shine some light.

Here's the "official" line as told in the news story from MSNBC:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44474315/ns/world_news-south_and_central_asia

edit: I don't know how to link to specific comments at CNN, so you can read them. However, one long thread was removed. That tells me even more. ............please, people are reading this here, but no comments or rec's. This could be very important!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
democrat2thecore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. PLEASE - this has already fallen down the tubes in the DU rush. Is anybody reading this?
Edited on Sun Sep-11-11 03:08 PM by democrat2thecore
Kicking for attention. Thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. What is most interesting is that they're telling us several injuries
but no deaths - a suicide bomber???
Something stinks here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat2thecore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Exactly
Family members are saying that they've not been told that everybody will be fine, etc. They have been told, apparently, nothing - except that there is a "lockdown" on information for "security reasons." Even the official family support groups aren't being told anything. I'm really wondering if this has to do with the 9/11 anniversary and not wanting it "spoiled" and the U.S. not wanting to have to address (and admit) mass casualties on this weekend. You're right, it stinks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Public Servant Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Um, no
Every report I've seen -- and I've been tracking this report for hours -- mentions that at least 5 Afghans were killed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat2thecore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. You're completely missing the point. Read the WHOLE post -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parker CA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Only thing I've seen on this besides this post was from the breaking news twitter feed. It stated
that, "All 66 troops hurt by suicide blast in Wardak province are expected to survive."

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. There was an attack in Afghanistan
Not in America.

That is what happens when you start wars, you get attacked.

I don't mean to be insensitive, but there it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Public Servant Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. This hasn't been hidden
It's on the front page of the New York Times and Washington Post websites and is the #3 top story on Google News. I think we can all take off the tinfoil now, yes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat2thecore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. You MISSED the point - completely
Are they not telling the families the TRUTH about casualties because of the weekend activities? I didn't say it wasn't being reported. I am saying that the families are being shut down from emails, etc. with that particular base and everybody is saying that is HIGHLY unusual and also the military is citing "security" for not even telling the family support conduits - anything!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Public Servant Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. I've worked with in Afghanistan
There is nothing unusual about a comms blackout after an attack, especially in a more remote area (which Wardak province is).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. Al Jazeera must be in on this cover up too!
Edited on Sun Sep-11-11 03:18 PM by MilesColtrane
Because I couldn't find anything about the bombing on its web site.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat2thecore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. We KNOW there was a bombing - that's not in dispute.
A suicide truck bomber hit the NATO base last night. That's a fact - the news IS reporting that. But, the military is putting out very little info to the media and not giving ANY info to the families?

This has NOTHING to do with tin-foil. I'm not a "truther" or anything else. This is just what's happening!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. The COMMS blackout s standard for the military
Until proper notification of next of kin.

This is not a conspiracy, it is procedure. I say this as a former navy wife. Every next of kin is briefed on this before deployment.

As to covering it properly you expect the MSM to get off script?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat2thecore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. True
Except....this is being described as "highly unusual" for family support groups. They really feel that 77 troops were not just injured - but maybe worse and that it's not being reported SIMPLY because of this anniversary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. They won't until proper notification
Family support KNOWS this. It is damn franking procedure.

Individual family members might not be fully aware of this. Trust me after 911 we were called by PACFLEET for a family brief, only one boat. Trust me rumors were flying especially when the base chaplain walked in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Public Servant Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. Exactly, thank you! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat2thecore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. I am TOTALLY confused by your motives. Something stinks really bad about this. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. Is the blackout usually about casualties
or the *names* of the casualties?

I always assumed that the names of the casualties are withheld from the media until the next of kin are informed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Public Servant Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Not always
In my experience, the blackout is usually about making sure they are reporting one set of facts, rather than continually changing their story. It's also just part of teh military's lamentable culture of secrecy and control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Names and units
Why they tell you five marines were killed/ injured...

Rarely they tell you where they are based, for example Pendleton, which pretty much narrows the unit.

The families of these troops know the unit, since they know more or less where they are based. For the sub service it was the western pacific so that would have been a tad more difficult.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat2thecore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. A family member just told me by email that it's 'Outpost Sayed Abad'
They still are simply asking for confirmation that media reports about no U.S. fatalities among the 77 are true and the military is REFUSING to confirm that. In fact, won't tell them anything. She says it's very different than when the Seals chopper went down just a few miles from there as troops from the Sayed Abad Post were involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Which means, translation
Some casualties are badly injured and they went to different forward battalion stations. 77 is not an easy number to triage when they are into the medical pipeline.

Even in the civilian world 77 end up at different triage, read hospital ER stations. It will take 24 hours to make head or tails. Seals it was a body recovery mission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. Wow - are paid Republicon trolls unrecommending this thread?
Who the Hell? Who want to cover up the truth? Sure has the familiar stank of republicon disinformation ops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. K&R. Anyone remember Vietnam and the 5 o-clock follies? - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
27. Yup...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
16. I actually logged on to DU this morning to read DU's comments on the bombing. Saw NO stories about
it. Confused me a bit. thanks for posting this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat2thecore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Thank you - ANY other weekend and it would be huge news - just as it is now -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. yes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat2thecore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
30. Why the unrec's? I don't get it. -eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hart2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Any implied criticism of the president now results in unrecs. NT
Edited on Sun Sep-11-11 09:48 PM by Hart2008

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
31. Does seem odd, could be statistical anomaly, let's wait and see. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
32. R&K
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kickysnana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
34. Kicking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bennyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
35. Kick and rec'd (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC