Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

COMEDY GOLD: Clash of The Clueless: Friedman v. Santelli

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-11 11:24 AM
Original message
COMEDY GOLD: Clash of The Clueless: Friedman v. Santelli
TRANSCRIPT

FRIEDMAN: No, I don’t think it’s a Ponzi scheme.

SANTELLI: Earlier in the show you said that we’re putting a burden on our kids that’s unsustainable. What’s the definition of a Ponzi scheme?

FRIEDMAN: It’s a program that made promises that it cannot keep in full and it needs to be fixed and reformed.

SANTELLI: Isn’t that exactly what a Ponzi pyramid is?

FRIEDMAN: I don’t think it is a Ponzi scheme as a criminal endeavor.

SANTELLI: No, no — forget the criminal side. You need more people to perpetuate a myth because if the people stop the myth is known to all. That’s my definition of a Ponzi scheme. Let’s call at it chain letter, a pyramid scheme. Isn’t that by definition what Social Security is? Take the legalities and fraud out.

STEVE LIESMAN: Why is it a Ponzi scheme, Rick?

FRIEDMAN: It is pay as we go. Ronald Reagan fixed it. Why can’t we fix it?

SANTELLI: What does Ronald Reagan have to do with my question?

FRIEDMAN: What does your question have to do with reality?

MICHELLE CARUSO CABRERA: We brought it up.

SANTELLI: You can’t decide that more people is the only thing made Social Security work. We have a real issue because many people in government seem to like to read your work.

FRIEDMAN: What makes Social Security work is fixing Social Security in terms of the population demands.

SANTELLI: I didn’t ask if we should fix it or not. I asked if it’s a pyramid scheme.

FRIEDMAN: Your question is idiotic. That’s what you asked.

SANTELLI: You’re answer’s idiotic. I’m done. I feel good.

FRIEDMAN: So do I.

VIDEO OF CLUELESSNESS:
http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2011/09/clash-of-the-clueless-friedman-v-santelli/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-11 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Fucking idiot. SSI is a system set in place so the govt can steal
money from the working poor and never pay it back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-11 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. By that argument, all human societies are Ponzi schemes.
What a fool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-11 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. Santelli is an asshole. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pkdu Donating Member (621 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-11 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
4. by Santellis own argument Capitalism is a Ponzi scheme n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-11 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. The "Ponzi shceme" meme ignores the actual payout.
It depends on who you ask but SocSec is recouped within 5-18 years depending on several factors.

Let's say your average income is $30,000 (this is from the bagging groceries to you highest income) at 6.2% you would contribute $1,800 a year. This is a high estimate by the way.
$1,800 X 40 years contributing = $72,000 contributed.

A monthly SocSec income of $1,000 (which is low)= annual of $12,000

$12,000 X 6 years = $72,000. After that you are receiving a benefit that you didn't pay into. It is a good (maybe too good for those who don't need it) investment for the individual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC