Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ed Shultz is off base with his comments that the President has told the super committee to do deep

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
mfcorey1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 07:13 PM
Original message
Ed Shultz is off base with his comments that the President has told the super committee to do deep
cuts to medicare. Adjustments don't mean that you wipe out all that is good in the program. Clamp down on fraud and save millions every year. That is where the problem is in medicare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Or 'adjustments' is code for cuts. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mfcorey1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. What cuts do you think he will suggest? Give me an example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. They could look at the extent to which CMS reporting systems are being directed by Risk Managers rat
her than by the authentic experiences & needs of patients.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Raising Medicare to 67 (or 70!) isn't only a cut to the program
it is a defacto tax increase.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. I missed that. Who is saying that's a possibility? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Medicare to 67 was what Obama was offering during the debt debacle
Thankfully, Boehner turned it down because he wouldn't accept the tax increases on the top 2%.

Feel free to bookmark this and we'll chat in 6 months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Who knows how much of that was authentic and how much was theater. When you're talking
to folks who would turn down $10. in cuts : $1 in tax increases, there's a lot of room to test any kind of responses you might be interested in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. Got popcorn???
Edited on Thu Sep-08-11 07:44 PM by polmaven
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
28. How would I know? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
30. or code to reduce waste and overpricing.
that is what Obama has been saying all along, if only some of you paid attention. There is a shitload of waste and double/triple dipping in the healthcare industry.

but to fill certain fantasies, he Must mean cut the livers out of old folks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Yes, could be that, too. Or could be lots of other things. nt
Edited on Thu Sep-08-11 11:03 PM by valerief
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. And "adjustments" can also be a euphemism for more revenue.
A way to say it without causing the entire House to start shooting at him.

Also, means testing is a possibility. No reason to cover the well to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Prosecuting fraud is not an adjustment, it is simply the
government doing it's job a bit, at last.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. self-delete nt
Edited on Thu Sep-08-11 08:12 PM by Raine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. It doesn't have to be legal fraud, though I'm sure that's there. There are all kinds of variations
in how Medicare funds are managed, most of which are legal, but less productive toward positive outcomes.

This could be a standards of care issue. My family has had some horrific experiences with our elderly mother before she passed on. Horrific! and all paid for by means of Medicare/Medicaid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. How do you know what he has told the super committee?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Did you not listen to the speech?
He said it in the speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. I did
That I missed thx!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I rather imagine that it is not he, but Kathleen Sebelius who will make the recommendations based
upon whatever data on quality measures that HEW has been collecting from CMS reporting systems plus whatever other legitimate research has been going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. To some professional organizations, studying Medicare is not a matter of idle speculation like it is
to other people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teddy51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. I wondered that as well, he seems almost giddy about medicare and medicaid
being affected. Does he have something against medical coverage for the poorest among us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarLeftFist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'm FOR tackling waste, fraud, and abuse. That covers a BIG chunk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. Wow man, that would piss off Michele Bachmann's husband!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. Cut waste OK but would you be ok with raising the eligibilty age? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mfcorey1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I am not for it but I know that is inevitable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. Don't think we need to go there but do think it will be offered up.
I have liberal relatives and co-workers that are OK with upping the age but they are already in their sixties.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
31. I see no reason whatsoever for it to be "inevitable"
There are nations on this planet that provide similar, or better, medical care to every one of their citizens literally from cradle to grave. It is silly to suggest that we have no alternative but to DECREASE the number of citizens eligible here. We can choose to do so but it is by no means the only alternative. We have other options.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. If they're actually allowed to go after the bullshit that goes on, there will be no need to raise
Edited on Thu Sep-08-11 07:40 PM by patrice
the eligibility age is my guess. Problem is that a significant amount of the bullshit is tied to the kinds of JOBS that make big campaign contributions and belong to all kinds of PACS and I don't mean rank-and-file staff here.

So, there's going to be a nasty fight about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lbrtbell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
16. "Adjustments" is code for "cuts" - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
19. "adjustments" is just a weasel word
It could mean anything.

Obama is very good at using words people can take to mean whatever they want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrmpa Donating Member (707 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
22. Agree with you-Schultz is beginning to see things.......
that just aren't there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
29. the President did not say deep cuts. Ed is full of shit. Again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC