Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question for DU lawyers about marriage equity, SCOTUS and Loving v Virginia

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
RandySF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 02:15 AM
Original message
Question for DU lawyers about marriage equity, SCOTUS and Loving v Virginia
Sooner or later, the constitutionality DOMA and Prop 8 will be decided by the US Supreme Court. If the Court decides that states may deny adults the right to marry on the basis of gender, what happens to Loving v Virginia (the landmark interracial marriage case)? It seems to me that Loving would become collateral damage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. As you'll recall, there is as yet no explicit protection against sex discrimination in our...
...Federal Constitution.

There is explicit protection against racial discrimination.

Loving will stand.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. The Loving v. Virginia decision, I believe, was based on the idea that
marriage is a fundamental right.

Remember the three tests: compelling reason applies when determining allegations of discrimination regarding a fundamental right. Since marriage is a fundamental right, it would seem to me that the defendants have to show a compelling reason for prohibiting same-sex marriage, not just a significant or rational one.

This is not just a gender discrimination case.
It is both gender and the issue of a fundamental right.

That is my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taterguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. Not a lawyer but the SCOTUS can do whatever they damn well please
They decide what outcome they want and then justify it.

There's no public demand to overturn Loving v Virginia so they'd leave it alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC