Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Know a rugged individualist? Prop him in front of his Apple II, and point him toward the prairie

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-11 11:56 AM
Original message
Know a rugged individualist? Prop him in front of his Apple II, and point him toward the prairie
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,923739-1,00.html

Essay: The Rugged Individual Rides Again

By HP-Time.com;Roger Rosenblatt Monday, Oct. 15, 1984

If you would win over a crowd of Americans, use the term rugged individualism; they will salute it like the flag. Why not?

Everyone always says that rugged individualism is the backbone, and the jawbone, of America; that a country as grand and sturdy as this could only have been built by the self-propelled and self-interested strivings of wild-eyed nonconformists, each fur-laden Daniel Boone pursuing his independent errand into the wilderness. The term is fairly precise. More aggressive than mere individuality, less narcissistic than the "me" decade, it does not refer to people who live in health clubs or on roller skates, or to the hotly cultivated yuppies who have come to mean so much to themselves. The "rugged" saves "rugged individualism" from shabbiness by implying not merely solitary but courageous action. Look. Here comes America. Davy Crockett, Thomas Edison, Teddy Roosevelt, Henry Ford. Those fellows built a nation with their hands.

Of course, the picture is pure hokum, and everybody knows it. The West was won by wagon trains, the East by sailing ships, and they all had plenty of passengers aboard, by necessity working together. "In history," Librarian of Congress Daniel Boorstin explained, "even the great explorer had been the man who drew others to a common purpose." Try to imagine an individual so rugged he could raise a roof beam on his own. snip

Do we preserve the loner ideal as an act of national defensiveness, to protect the country from conceding that it is too much alone in the world? Before the Second World War, a great many Americans sought international isolation. Once the nation be came a superpower it achieved more isolation than anyone ever dreamed of; in a bipolar world, both poles are alone. The individualist Henry David Thoreau called America "The Great Western Pioneer whom the nations follow." Do they indeed? All right, then, says the proud country: If we would be left alone, let us be' alone gloriously, ruggedly. And by extension: Let every individual be alone. Prop him in front of his Apple II, and point him toward the prairie.

-------------------------

I remembered reading this article back in 1984 and looked for it. Though it is dated I thought it might still be interesting to some?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-11 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's a dual truth: we must be individuals and we must be a part of a society.
Balancing those two needs, so that people do not feel oppressed by the constant control of others, and not so free they are totally on their own when they need people, that's difficult.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-11 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Insightful is an understatement. There is a lot to ponder. I'm bowled over
in fact so not much to add at this time, other than it reminds me of Philip Slater's Pursuit of Loneliness written in the 70's.


:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-11 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. We need a rereading of de Toqueville.
Part of the mythology of the 'rugged individualist' came from a misreading of his work. People chose to cherry-pick the complementary bits and ignore the wise criticisms - rather like they cherry-picked Adam Smith's moral philosophy and invented American style free-market capitalism without the restraints that Smith said must accompany the concept.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC