Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mistrial clouds fate of teen accused in slaying of gay student

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 03:42 PM
Original message
Mistrial clouds fate of teen accused in slaying of gay student
A judge declared a mistrial after jurors said they could not agree whether to convict Brandon McInerney, the middle school student who shot and killed a gay classmate during a morning computer lab.

Jurors deadlocked 7 to 5 in favor of voluntary manslaughter in the emotional two-month trial in the case of the stunning 2008 shooting inside an Oxnard classroom.

Defense attorney Scott Wippert said McInerney was disappointed by the mistrial because his fate was left hanging. Prosecutors probably won't announce until next month whether they will try the 17-year-old a second time, and whether he again will be tried as an adult.

McInerney sat stiffly and silently at the defense table as Ventura County Judge Charles Campbell declared a mistrial. His mother, Kendra McInerney, sobbed into her hands. The parents of victim Larry King, Greg and Dawn King, stormed from the courtroom with other relatives, even as the judge was still addressing the jurors.

full: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2011/09/mistrial-gay-student-slaying.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. this is a disgrace
charged with murder 1 and couldn't get manslaughter 1. The victim was blamed and the straits on the jury let this punk slide. Try him in SF. Typical justice for Gays
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. I could have told you months ago this little shit would walk
He'll probably end up going to college and being your typical Alpha Male fraternity asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's OK to Slay if they're Gay.
Manslaughter? They wouldn't even convict the killer of manslaughter? He shot the other kid twice in the head! He told other students he was going to kill Larry King before he did it, and tried to recruit other students to help him carry it out. That's premeditated murder, I don't give a damn what anyone says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. institutional homophobia n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. It took me awhile but I found a link with a more detailed account
Edited on Sat Sep-03-11 05:04 PM by dsc
http://www.lgbtqnation.com/2011/09/prosecutors-vow-to-retry-california-teen-accused-of-killing-gay-classmate/

Jurors on Thursday said they were deadlocked on a verdict, with seven favoring a voluntary-manslaughter conviction and five pushing for first- or second-degree murder. The jurors, who have not spoken to the media about the deliberations, told defense attorneys that they did not believe the killing amounted to a hate crime.

Prosecutors on Friday disagreed and said they continue to believe the killing was motivated by victim Larry King’s sexual preference. They also said they believe that McInerney was lying in wait to kill King, an allegation that automatically qualifies him to be tried as an adult, Ellison said.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2011/09/prosecutors-vow-to-retry-teen-who-killed-gay-classmate.html

Jurors on Thursday said they were deadlocked on a verdict, with seven favoring a voluntary-manslaughter conviction and five pushing for first- or second-degree murder. The jurors, who have not spoken to the media about the deliberations, told defense attorneys that they did not believe the killing amounted to a hate crime.

end of quotes

Apparently the 5 who refused to convict of manslaughter were holding out for murder 1 or murder 2. As much as I hate the idea of doing this, I think the best case scenario would be a retrial, as an adult, for manslaughter without the hate crime. That would be a longer sentence than retrial as a juvenile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC