Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama administration now says high unemployment could persist at around 9% well into 2012.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 11:54 AM
Original message
Obama administration now says high unemployment could persist at around 9% well into 2012.
White House Downshifts on Jobs, Growth
By JOHN D. MCKINNON
September 2, 2011

The Obama administration now says U.S. unemployment could persist at its current stubbornly high level around 9% well into 2012.

A new economic forecast released Thursday suggests the White House is bracing for a weak economy in the coming election year, while bolstering President Barack Obama's calls for more government action to boost hiring and economic growth.

Mr. Obama is scheduled to address a joint session of Congress next Thursday to outline his latest economic proposals. His ideas could include "a mix of tax cuts to create jobs and provide economic security to the middle class, innovative infrastructure ideas to put people back to work," as well as measures aimed at the long-term unemployed, the report said. White House press secretary Jay Carney suggested the measures could push the unemployment rate below 9%, but he also sought to avoid making predictions.



http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904583204576544683358565312.html?mod=WSJ_WSJ_US_News_5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is the cost of putting the health care bill before jobs.
Was it really worth losing the house and maybe now the Presidency?

If it was a really good bill that covered people and got us on par with the cost structures of other countries I would say yes. But the bill we have didn't do much for cost so I consider it a big mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. 79 million boomer$ $tart turning 65 thi$ year
between 162 - 172 million people in the next 2 decades will shift away from for profit healthcare

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
haikugal Donating Member (476 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well Duh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC