Nevada AG Catherine Cortez Masto Destroys BofA in New Lawsuit

[kpete]

The Nevada AG is looking to reopen the 2008 AG settlement with BoA: the AG alleges rampant and immediate non-compliance with the settlement. The NYT coverage missed what is arguably the bigger story: the Nevada AG came out and alleged a securitization fail. The NY AG moved in this direction in his BNYM settlement action intervention, but was a little more oblique on that point. The Nevada AG minced no words:

Bank of America misrepresented, both in communications with Nevada consumers and in documents they recorded and filed, that they had authority to foreclose upon consumers' homes as servicer for the trusts that held these mortgages. Defendants knew (and were on notice) that they had never properly transferred these mortgage to those trusts, failing to deliver properly endorsed or assigned mortgage notes as required by the relevant legal contracts and state law. Because the trusts never became holders of these mortgages, Defendants lacked authority to collect or foreclose on their behalf and never should have represented they could.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/business/SecondAmendedComplaint.pdf
http://www.creditslips.org/creditslips/2011/08/nevada-ag-securitization-fail.html

http://news.firedoglake.com/2011/08/31/nevada-ag-catherine-cortez-masto-destroys-bofa-in-new-lawsuit/
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/08/30/homeowners-seek-to-block-bank-of-america-settlement/?scp=2&sq=nelson%20schwartz&st=cse

[Sanity Claws]

1. Finally!

This is what every state AG should have done years ago.
In fact, when they should have sued the banks when they created MERS to avoid paying transfer fees.