Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

National Geographic Trashes Its Brand with Bush ‘Infomercial’ on 9/11

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
babsbunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-11 05:33 PM
Original message
National Geographic Trashes Its Brand with Bush ‘Infomercial’ on 9/11
http://www.pensitoreview.com/2011/08/30/national-geographic-trashes-its-brand-with-bush-infomercial-on-911/

On “Countdown” last night, Keith Olbermann and Markos Moulistsas rightly savaged the National Geographic Channel for producing a Fox News style interview with George Bush on the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks.

Olbermann noted that while Bush refers to 9/11 as a “monumental” and “significant” event but he never uses word like “tragic” or “sad.” Moulitsas suggested that the reason Bush did not describe the attacks as “tragic” is because he and his party did not view the attack as a tragedy but rather as an opportunity to install a more authoritarian regime inside the government.

The Bush interview and the release of Dick Cheney’s memoir were strategically timed to come out around the tenth anniversary of the terror attacks next month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-11 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. FYI Fox News owns the National Geographic Channel
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky Luciano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-11 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Yep. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-11 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. k&r....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-11 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. It was a horrible interview if we could call it that
Infomercial is correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GReedDiamond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-11 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Mis-infomercial would be more accurate, IMO...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 06:32 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. You win
:fistbump: :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-11 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. NG's been shooting down 9-11 conspiracy talk since its first special.
I don't recall a single National Geographic program mentioning the FBI snuffing out Colleen Rowley's investigation of Zacarias Moussaoui in Minnesota or of the CIA "failing" to inform FBI of the presence of two terrorists in San Diego.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-11 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. or that Marvin Bush's company was in charge of ...
.... security at the WTC, United Airlines, and Dulles Airport and that Bertha Champagne, who worked @
Marvin Bush's house car rolled back and crushed her to death just days after 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
8. National Geographic Channel is becoming about as useless as the History Channel
Guess it won't be long before NG is overrun with shows about the Bible Code, Nostradamus, ancient aliens, Nazi occult, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. The History Channel used to put on some outstanding ....
.... shows.



I know I am a geek but Simon Schama's History of Britain was outstanding ...... now the History Channel
is "dumb asses having interpersonal problems in the swamp."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwhitesj Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I agree
It's really sad that they reduced themselves to the lowest common denominator. They have alienated their core demographic with the crap they put on their now. TLC and the Discovery channel have done the same thing. Science Channel is the only channel I can still watch from those networks regularly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. the cable channel is a far cry from the periodical
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC