Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Don Siegelman is still serving a 7 year sentence. Is that F'd up or what?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-11 10:58 AM
Original message
Don Siegelman is still serving a 7 year sentence. Is that F'd up or what?
Edited on Fri Aug-26-11 11:26 AM by mistertrickster
2.5 years after Obama was elected on "Change," his Justice Dept. can't seem to summon the will to pursue the real criminals in this trumped up travesty of justice.

Even if Siegelman were guilty of the wrong-doing he's accused of (giving a donor a non-paid chairmanship of a powerless board, the same chairmanship he had for the previous two terms under R-Gov's) which he's not, the sentence itself is a crime. Another former Gov. Guy Hunt (R-obviously) pocketed 200 grand and only got probation.


Free Don Siegelman

http://donsiegelman.org/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-11 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. Just-Us
Of course, Bushes, Cheney and Rove run free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-11 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. IOIWDDI
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-11 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
28. IYAARIILTCC. I googled your acronym, and got only this thread.
Edited on Sat Aug-27-11 10:37 AM by L. Coyote
IYAARIILTCC (pronounced aye air eel tick)
(If you are a Republican, it is legal to commit crimes)

On edit, found it on DU:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=4515519&mesg_id=4515764
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-11 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. kicking for justice's sake. I had so much hope that Obama & the Dems would
act to bring justice & peace to this country. So disappointed. I'm at the point of hoping a third party (Or Progressive Dem) will enter the race as I don't know if I can even vote for the guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-11 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. He could be freed at the stroke of a pen by Obama
just saying...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-11 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. President Obama has issued 9 pardons so far:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-11 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Conspiracy to defraud by making false statements to the Food and Drug Administration.
pardonable but political prisoner sentenced by a corrupt judge...not so pardonable?

Seigelman's Judge Fuller:

The Pork Barrel World of Judge Mark Fuller
By Scott Horton

For the last week, we’ve been examining the role played by Judge Mark Everett Fuller in the trial, conviction, and sentencing of former Alabama Governor Don E. Siegelman. Today, we examine a post-trial motion, filed in April 2007, asking Fuller to recuse himself based on his extensive private business interests, which turn very heavily on contracts with the United States Government, including the Department of Justice.

The recusal motion rested upon details about Fuller’s personal business interests. On February 22, 2007, defense attorneys obtained information that Judge Fuller held a controlling 43.75% interest in government contractor Doss Aviation, Inc. After investigating these claims for over a month, the attorneys filed a motion for Fuller’s recusal on April 18, 2007. The motion stated that Fuller’s total stake in Doss Aviation was worth between $1-5 million, and that Fuller’s income from his stock for 2004 was between $100,001 and $1 million dollars.

In other words, Judge Fuller likely made more from his business income, derived from U.S. Government contracts, than as a judge. Fuller is shown on one filing as President of the principal business, Doss Aviation, and his address is shown as One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama, the address of the Frank M. Johnson Federal Courthouse, in which his chambers are located.

-snip
http://harpers.org/archive/2007/08/hbc-90000762
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-11 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. The 'corrupt' judge has not been convicted of, or even charged with, any corruption
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-11 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. exactly. if we had a just justice, Siegelman case would be fully investigated
Edited on Fri Aug-26-11 03:25 PM by mod mom
and Judge Fuller would be scrutinized, instead his corrupt verdict stands. Holder can't be bothered by such cases but looking at the pardons that Obama has made, "Conspiracy to defraud by making false statements to the Food and Drug Administration, "

Dorsey ran an import-export firm when he made false statements to the FDA to avoid paying taxes.
-snip

http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-243554080.html

attempting to avoid paying taxes...now there's a stellar person whose case is worthy of scrutiny & a presidential pardon. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-11 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Do you know for a fact that Holder and the Justice Department did not investigate this case?
Or are you just assuming that because you do not like the outcome?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-11 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #21
32. I don't find a reference on Google to an investigation since 2008.
I don't see that anyone appointed by Obama has looked to see what happened.

But then, Siegelman was a potential presidential contender -- and a very, very strong one, and from what I have seen, Obama does not like competition.

Siegelman brought an appeal in 2009, but I don't see any suggestion that the Justice Department questioned or investigated itself about the merits of the underlying case or any possible wrongdoing.

This is another case of selective looking forward by the Obama administration.

A critical look at the involvement of Justice Department at anything done by the Bush administration is "off the table."

Social Security and Medicare are on the table, but investigating the criminal conduct of the previous Bush administration is off the table.

Same show, same sponsors, only the names and faces of the actors have been changed to protect the guilty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-11 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. Does the Justice Department make a public announcement for each and every one of its investigations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-11 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Yeah Freddie, it was a secret investigation and found out Bush was right. Why dont you Third Way'ers
start your own party?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #37
41. Why should we start our own party when we are getting our way now?
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-11 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. There was an investigation in 2008 -- during the Bush administration.
We want the Obama administration to investigate now.

Why? Because we do not trust the Bush administration Justice Department to have objectively and fairly investigated its own employees, its own staff and judges that decided with the Bush administration.

That is especially true because there are allegations that Rove may have influenced the Siegelman case in some way. Those allegations may be true or false. They should be independently investigated by the Obama administration's Justice Department -- and most importantly, by people within the current Justice Department who are not in any way associated with the staff and lawyers, etc. who worked on the Siegelman case.

Don Siegelman was an up and coming, honest politician. He was a contender for the presidency although not announced.

I lived in Mobile and in Southern Alabama for some years. The politics were rotten there back then, and I have no doubt that they still are.

So this should be investigated. And sooner rather than later.

An attorney from Alabama testified before Congress accusing, as I understand it, Karl Rove of some improper involvement in the case. Was she telling the truth? Why would she perjure herself?

So a lot of questions remain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #39
42. How do you know that the Obama Administration did not review that investigation
or even conduct their own investigation? It is unlikely that they are unaware of the conspiracy allegations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-11 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. Well we never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity.
We looked to a hero who is anything but. Everybody who claims we cherrypick or if you demand examples of unpardonable failure: HERE YA GO!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-11 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
5. When Holder gets through jailing cancer patients and letting financial criminals run free,
he will surely get right on the Siegelman case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-11 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. The Siegelman case is but a microcosm of justice in the house of
Holder. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-11 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. The prosecutor claimed that KKKarl Rove had nothing to do with the case,
but when Rove was questioned about it, he had no comment and the first thing he did was to "lawyer up."

Then the Bush WH claimed "exec privilege."

Well . . . nothing to see here then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-11 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. As someone who deals with the DOJ almost every day
Nothing has changed there. Nothing. Same policies and even the same people for the most part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-11 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. That is the one thing that has pissed my off completely.
Why the HELL would you leave the Dick Cheney JD intact? That's just insane and Obama didn't just drop the ball on this one, he punted on 1st down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-11 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. So what was the point of electing Democrats if they changed nothing
This is an issue that should be a big part of the next election. What are they going to do about ending Bush policies and getting rid of Bush holdovers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-11 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #11
29. Ask instead why an intern at Bush's Counsel's law firm ran for President.
Edited on Sat Aug-27-11 10:14 AM by L. Coyote
That's right, Obama's firm, Sidley Austin, defended the Bush criminals during the oversight hearings. Search DU for the firm name.
One of the partners worked as Bush's legal counsel in the White House before Obama entered national politics.
Obama's personal connections to Bush's legal defense were well-known from before he entered electoral politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-11 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #29
38. I did not know that, thank you.
Seems they are all connected somehow ~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-11 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. I thought it would NOT be possible to go lower than Alberto Gonzales,
but Eric Holder has proved me wrong.

The Very First Thing on Holder's list
was to get corrupt Republican Senator Ted Stevens out of jail.


But Democrat Don Siegelman,
the obvious victim of a corrupt Rail Roading in which Carl Rove was directly implicated?

Don WHO?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-11 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
14. Beyond fucked up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-11 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
15. very
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-11 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
16. No justice, just justice for some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-11 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
17. I thought he got out, but his charges had not been dismissed!
Is he still in prison?

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
former9thward Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-11 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. The 11th circuit upheld his conviction in May, 2011
Siegelman is appealing to the Supreme Court. He is free while on appeal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-11 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
22. Are you saying he is in prison? If so, please give us a link, if not, it's a very misleading
headline. I support Siegelman but want to know the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-11 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #22
30. I thought he was in prison. I may be wrong apparently.
Could not find a link one way or the other.

I know he has done some prison time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-11 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. I believe he is not in prison at this time. Below is a good link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-11 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #22
35. Why let fact get in the way of a good Obama-bashing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-11 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Your whining is getting tiresome Freddie. Apparently you stand with Obama and Bush re. Don
Edited on Sat Aug-27-11 12:17 PM by rhett o rick
Seigelman. Some of us hoped Obama would rectify some of the Bush disasters. Were we wrong. The Obama admin sides with Bush vs. Seigelman and sides with Cheney vs. war crimes trials.

We have to kick the damn Blue Dogs (read Republicans) out of our party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-11 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #36
43. I stand with President Obama and the punishment of crooks
We should not give a free pass to crooks just because we do not like the previous administration.

If you want to get rid of the Blue Dogs in Congress, why not have liberals run in their districts. Dennis Kucinich is shopping for a seat to run for. Perhaps he should run in a Blue Dog district rather than a safe, cozy, overwhelmingly Democratic seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-11 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
23. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
spicegal Donating Member (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-11 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
25. This story has completely fallen off the radar screen.
What's the deal? This man should have been freed a long time ago. What an incredible travesty. Guess no one is talking about it anymore. And when you consider what so many other politicians have gotten away with. Take Dick Cheney, the war criminal, as just one small example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-11 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
26. OTOH, convicted Rep Senator Ted Sevens had his conviction voided by the Admin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #26
44. Because the judge found that there was prosecutorial misconduct in that case
No judge has ever made such a finding in the Siegelman case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-11 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
27. He's free on bail pending while he persues his appeal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-11 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. "Siegelman, who received a seven-year sentence, has been free while he pursues his appeal."
I stand corrected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC