Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

An Obituary for Change in Washington

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-11 11:25 AM
Original message
An Obituary for Change in Washington
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/08/20-1

Published on Saturday, August 20, 2011 by TomDispatch.com

An Obituary for Change in Washington
by Tom Engelhardt

Those first acts of that first shining full day in the Oval Office are now so forgotten, but on January 21, 2009, among other things, Barack Obama promised to return America to “the high moral ground,” and then signed a straightforward executive order “requiring that the Guantanamo Bay detention facility be closed within a year.” It was an open-and-shut case, so to speak, part of what CNN called “a clean break from the Bush administration.” On that same day, as part of that same break, the president signed an executive order and two presidential memoranda hailing a “new era of openness,” of sunshine and transparency in government. As the president put it, "Every agency and department should know that this administration stands on the side not of those who seek to withhold information, but those who seek to make it known."

Of course, nothing could have been more Bushian, if you were thinking about “clean breaks,” than America’s wars in the Greater Middle East. When it came to the Iraq War, at least, President Obama arrived in office with another goal and another promise that couldn’t have been more open and shut (or so his supporters thought), not just drawing down Bush’s disastrous war in Iraq, but “ending” it “responsibly.” (Admittedly, he was also muttering quietly about “residual forces” there, but who noticed?)

Two and a half years later, Guantanamo remains thrivingly open, while all discussion of ever closing it has long since ended; the administration has, in those same years, gained a fierce reputation as an enforcer of government secrecy and, while it has prosecuted neither torturers, nor financial titans, it has gone after government whistleblowers with a passion. In the meantime, the Iraq War was indeed wound down “responsibly” (which turned out to mean incredibly slowly), but in recent months, as U.S. casualties again rose, the Obama administration and the U.S. military have visibly been in a desperate search for ways to keep sizeable numbers of American forces there as “trainers,” while also militarizing a vast State Department mission in Baghdad and outfitting it for the long haul with more than 5,000 armed mercenaries as well as a mini-air force.

Promises? As Mad magazine’s Alfred E. Neuman used to say: What? Me worry? As it happens, David Bromwich, essayist for the Huffington Post and the New York Review of Books, does worry. In “George W. Obama?” he offers a new yardstick for measuring the promises of, and the nature of, the Obama administration, as well as the nature of its “break” with the Bush era ; or rather think of his post as an obituary for the possibility of change in Washington.

Copyright 2011 Tom Engelhardt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-11 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. the only change is that spare stuff that desperate people
search for in their sofas, in hopes of buying food for their kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-11 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. we could see that obituary being written with the business-as-usual cabinet appointments
Quite a deflating period....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-11 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. Empire strikes back
Obama had his heart in the right place but once ensconced in the seat of power the Empire let him know in no uncertain terms that he was to do the bidding of Empire.

It will take another four years to break the bonds, if even then.
He said as much the night he won the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-11 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Not pointing the finger only at the current President,
but isn't it convenient to be able to say "it will take another four years" to fix things/'break the bonds'/etc when the job can only last eight years?

President Obama is not the only President to make a comment like that, but it sounds just as weasel-wordy coming from him as from his predecessors. While it is true that Presidents' face enormous challenges, it is not true that they are without power. Standing up to the challenges takes a lot of spine, though - and we haven't had a President with spine in many decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-11 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Sure
One person can not prevail against Empire.

You do grok what Empire entails, right?

Obama, previously on the fringe of the Empire, could see the future. But once seated and surrounded and heckled and harassed by the Kings and Queens, realized he is but a pawn in the game.

Keep up the pressure. He even said as much.

If somehow destroying Obama would end Empire, I would be all in.
The reality is Obama is the only hope we have. So... for me... no destruction is called for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salinen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-11 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Bernie Sanders
is in the same position almost, and has never commented on what the Empire does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-11 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Almost the same position?
A senator from little old Vermont is almost the same as POTUS?

That makes no f'n sense whatsoever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
griffi94 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-11 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. but he signed the lily ledbetter act
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbie Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-11 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. Why disparage a woman's right to equal pay?
I see ppl make light of this accomplishment around here all the time.

liberal values in action.. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-11 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. He Neglects to Mention that the Repigs Blocked the Funding to Close Gitmo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-11 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Yep
So did a bunch of democrats. Pretty much the same bunch that voted to invade Iraq, spend more on defense and keep those gawd-damned voting machines in every precinct.

The real Truthers of American politics are a minority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JayhawkSD Donating Member (70 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-11 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Indeed they did,
and the minute they did he folded like a cheap suit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Desertrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-11 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
10. K & R
:hi:G_j :loveya:

Thx ...good article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-11 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
14. He does listen to dissent- but only from the right
He mocks dissent coming from his left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-11 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
15. knr - "gained a fierce reputation as an enforcer of government secrecy"
http://www.tomdispatch.com/archive/175398/

"...Of course, when it came to a range of potential Bush-era crimes -- the use of torture, the running of offshore “black sites,” the extraordinary rendition of terrorist suspects to lands where they would be tortured, illegal domestic spying and wiretapping, and the launching of wars of aggression -- it’s hardly news that no one of the slightest significance has ever been brought to justice. On taking office, President Obama offered a clear formula for dealing with this issue. He insisted that Americans should “look forward, not backward” and turn the page on the whole period, and then set his Justice Department to work on other matters...

On Not Blowing Whistles

It’s beyond symbolic, then, that only one figure from the national security world seems to remain in the “legal” crosshairs: the whistle-blower. If, as the president of the United States, you sign off on a system of warrantless surveillance of Americans -- the sort that not so long ago was against the law in this country -- or if you happen to run a giant telecom company and go along with that system by opening your facilities to government snoops, or if you run the National Security Agency or are an official in it overseeing the kind of data mining and intelligence gathering that goes with such a program, then -- as recent years have made clear -- you are above the law.

If, however, you happen to be an NSA employee who feels that the agency has overstepped the bounds of legality in its dealings with Americans, that it is moving in Orwellian directions, and that it should be exposed, and if you offer even unclassified information to a newspaper reporter, as was the case with Thomas Drake, be afraid, be very afraid...

...If you are a private in the U.S. military with access to a computer with low-level classified material from the Pentagon’s wars and the State Department’s activities on it, if you’ve seen something of the grim reality of what the national security state looks like when superimposed on Iraq, and if you decide to shine some light on that world, as Bradley Manning did, they’ll toss you into prison and throw away the key. You’ll be accused of having “blood on your hands” and tried, again under the Espionage Act, by those who actually have blood on their hands and are beyond all accountability..."




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-11 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. essentially sums up what has most horrified me
about the Obama administration, combined with the "moving forward" excuse for letting Bush admin. war crimes go un investigated and unpunished. For me there is zero excuse or justification for any of this. These policies are rooted in the "dark side".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-11 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. Sums it up well. K&R
"If we don't fight hard enough for the things we stand for,
at some point we have to recognize that we don't really stand for them."

--- Paul Wellstone


photo by bvar22
Shortly before Sen Wellstone was killed


Solidarity!


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC