Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

VERDICT In Federal Bingo TRIAL Shines New Light On The Don SIEGELMAN Case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Segami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-11 01:37 PM
Original message
VERDICT In Federal Bingo TRIAL Shines New Light On The Don SIEGELMAN Case
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-UPQQPKAYGXQ/TklQp6kdDbI/AAAAAAAAAlQ/DF4LYhRcBsI/s200/Myron+Thompson.jpg
U.S. District Judge Myron Thompson



:smoke:



" The outcome of the federal Alabama bingo trial, which produced zero convictions for nine defendants and 37 counts, has been described as "one of the most remarkable setbacks nationally" for federal prosecutors in decades. It also has been described as a "humiliation of epic proportions" for the Obama Justice Department and its Bush DOJ holdovers.


In a narrower sense, the bingo verdict provides proof that the Don Siegelman case, perhaps the most notorious political prosecution in American history, was unlawfully decided. It also provides proof that at least one other Bush-era political prosecution, that of Mississippi attorney Paul Minor, was unlawfully decided. Ironically, the proof comes from the reporting of The Birmingham News, perhaps the leading mainstream-media cheerleader for federal prosecutors in "public corruption" cases. Do you want even more irony? The Birmingham News has repeatedly praised the work of prosecutors and judges who ramrodded the Siegelman case--and the newspaper has hinted over and over that, in its view, the Siegelman case was decided correctly.


Isn't it interesting, then, that Alabama's largest newspaper winds up providing proof that the Siegelman case was NOT correctly decided. Do you think the News' editorial higher ups, the leading mouthpieces for our state's corrupt elites, will even notice what they have done? I doubt it. Since the verdict was announced last Thursday, the News' coverage has reflected this primary theme: The defendants really were guilty, but prosecutors from Washington screwed up the case. As usual, columnist John Archibald carries the water for his big bosses, with a piece titled "Verdict No Surprise: Prosecutors Bungled Bingo Case." Consider this analysis from Archibald:



Federal prosecutors, especially the superstars brought in by Washington, had more slip-ups than a blindfolded banana peeler on a hockey rink.

They stumbled picking a jury and fumbled as they misjudged the role politics would play in the defense strategy. They bumbled as they failed to realize how their star witnesses would ooze on the stand, coming across, after pummeling by the defense, as self-serving, politically driven and racist.





cont'



http://legalschnauzer.blogspot.com/2011/08/verdict-in-federal-bingo-trial-shines.html



.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-11 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bingo trial?
This is the first I've heard anything about a bingo trial.

Can you explain this, and it's relation to Don Siegelman?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-11 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I believe the reference to bingo is somehow connected to the Abramoff scandal
Edited on Mon Aug-15-11 02:42 PM by closeupready
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Segami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-11 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. These TPM articles might shed some historical light on these proceedings.
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/bingo_bribery/


Update late today:

"..... federal prosecutors indicated Monday that they'll give it another go on the charges that weren't unanimously acquitted. A judge has scheduled a new trial for October...."

- Former U.S. Attorney Doug Jones, who briefly represented a casino owner who pleaded guilty, told the Associated Press that the case was a "disaster" for the Justice Department, which had touted their case as a "full-scale" bribery scheme that was "astonishing in scope."

"The government hoisted its flag and walked away with nothing," he said


- One of the federal prosecutors involved in the case, Brenda Morris, was also involved in the botched prosecution of the late Sen. Ted Stevens. Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer, who heads the Justice Department's Criminal Division, previously defended Morris as one of the "excellent" lawyers on the team.



cont'



http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/08/after_major_setback_feds_set_to_retry_alabama_pols_casino_owner_in_bingo_bribery_case_in_october.php?ref=fpb



.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-11 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Go to al.com and search for bingo --
of course this is not an unbiased source, since it's the home of the B'ham Times.

http://search.al.com/bingo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-11 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Senator Jeff Sessions is probably celebrating somewhere
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-11 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC