Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Keeping a Curious Bush Secret

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 05:19 PM
Original message
Keeping a Curious Bush Secret
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Keeping-a-Curious-Bush-Sec-by-Robert-Parry-110812-279.html

More than three decades ago, on Oct. 19, 1980, then-Republican vice presidential candidate George H.W. Bush supposedly took an afternoon trip to visit a family friend in Washington, an alibi that could prove he could not have traveled secretly to Paris for treacherous meetings with Iranians.

But Bush's White House in 1992 -- and his presidential library now -- have refused to release the name of this alibi witness or even the address where Bush allegedly went. The insistence on keeping this secret has just been reaffirmed by Debra Steidel Wall, deputy archivist of the United States.

So, rather than release what theoretically should be a fact the Bush Family would want out -- proof that the elder George Bush did not engage in secret talks with Iranians behind President Jimmy Carter's back regarding 52 Americans then being held hostage in Iran -- the U.S. government is saying that only a costly federal court lawsuit can dislodge this historical detail.

Or, perhaps the reason that this secret has been so zealously guarded for so long is that Bush never took the afternoon trip, that it was just part of a cover story to conceal his mission to Paris, and that the host -- if questioned -- would discredit Bush's alibi.

More at the link --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
smokey nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
40. Trick or Treason!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Which begs the second question
Who Tipped off the Iranians the Special Forces were coming
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zywiec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. How were the Iranians tipped off?
The special forces mission was aborted before they ever saw any Iranians.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Ollie North provided false weather conditions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 06:32 AM
Response to Reply #7
17. Thanks a steaming pantload, Ollie (R)
Why does Ollie North and his Republicon cronies always act against America?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #17
24. Because they're patriots!
:patriot: :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zywiec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
36. With all of the services having their own meteorologists
why would anyone listen to Ollie North about weather conditions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Tipped off a sandstorm.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zywiec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Is that like the Karl Rove weather machine?
LOL

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Yeah, it's a laff-riot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
42. People died, you think that's funny?
And US President was betrayed. That's generally called treason. Hopefully one day we will see justice for that treason perpetrated by the same suspects who always seem to be involved in undermining this country because up to now, they have been let off the hook for their crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
21. A very Big Fireball
This is second-hand from the former mistress of the Mission Commander:

The Helos landed at an improvised Air Field called Desert One to refuel, as they didn't have the range to make it to Tehran and back,
C-130 Transports, carrying Fuel Bladders also landed. The pilots of the Helos were told to Ground-Taxi up to the planes, in turn, to refuel. One of the pilots decided to lift off slightly to get out of the Sand, lost his orientation and flew into one of the Planes, setting off a huge fire. The Mission Commander then ordered the Mission aborted and the survivors piled on to the remaining Aircraft and abandoned the remaining Helos and equipment to the Iranians.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. Sounds like an operation within an operation.
Sorry, I will never believe anything else. They were and remain Republican filth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #25
39. There were people on the Ground setting up the Airfield
2 Weeks before the operation

It even had Landing Lights so the Aircraft could find the Runway, and a 'Control Tower', such as the Military use in such situations.

That's the info from the pilot who took the crew in. Iran had no idea what was going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #39
45. There was a Bush fascist insider somewhere.
Of this, I have no doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R #24. And here are the solid bits of proof:
*************QUOTE*************

from p. 3 of the link:



.... There were other bits and pieces of corroboration about the Paris meetings.

A French arms dealer, Nicholas Ignatiew, told me in 1990 that he had checked with his government contacts and was told that Republicans did meet with Iranians in Paris in mid-October 1980.

A well-connected French investigative reporter Claude Angeli said his sources inside the French secret service confirmed that the service provided "cover" for a meeting between Republicans and Iranians in France on the weekend of Oct. 18-19. German journalist Martin Kilian had received a similar account from a top aide to intelligence chief deMarenches.

As early as 1987, Iran's ex-President Bani-Sadr had made similar claims about a Paris meeting, and Israeli intelligence officer Ari Ben-Menashe claimed to have been present outside the meeting and saw Bush, Casey and other Americans in attendance.

Finally, the Russian government sent a report to the House Task Force, saying that Soviet-era intelligence files contained information about Republicans holding a series of meetings with Iranians in Europe, including one in Paris in October 1980.

"William Casey, in 1980, met three times with representatives of the Iranian leadership," the Russian report said. "The meetings took place in Madrid and Paris."

At the Paris meeting in October 1980, "former CIA Director George Bush also took part," the report said. "The representatives of Ronald Reagan and the Iranian leadership discussed the question of possibly delaying the release of 52 hostages from the staff of the U.S. Embassy in Teheran."

Requested by Rep. Lee Hamilton, D-Indiana, who was in charge of the lackadaisical congressional inquiry into the October Surprise mystery, the Russian report arrived via the U.S. Embassy in Moscow in January 1993. But Hamilton's task force had already decided to dismiss the October Surprise allegations as lacking solid evidence. ....

*************UNQUOTE*************
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. It is disgusting for the media to gush over Poppy about how honorable and decent he is!1
Poppy BUSH has always gotten away with throwing a hissy fit when he’s confronted by tough questions, like why his five sons got to pillage the public funds (Jeb with suitcases of cash on planes with Cuban partners pillaging Medicare; Neill getting bailed out in his Savings & Loan scams). (His answer to that one: "My boys have a right to make a living!1")

What is absurd is that these jokers think the truth will never be known. But Dems appear to have cowardice and “bi-partisan compromise” in their DNA. This article says Rep. Lee HAMILTON agreed to eliminate the one investigator with all the guts and proof from the inquiry and led a “lackadaisical” committee investigation and didn’t pursue the Russian report with the proof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. +1
I recall hearing that Poppy made a quick visit here to Denver to meet with a wealthy friend. It was right after little Neil's S&L fiasco. I wondered then if Pops was here to smooth something over. Neil had already hightailed it out of town.

That episode crushed the real estate market here for many years. The Bushes are real bastards who I wouldn't trust even if I had my two eyes on the lot of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. 41 MUST be honorable and decent.




After all, they named an aircraft carrier after him.


:sarcasm:

:puke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. He sure did!

The Grimm Reaper Sr. finally got his own death machine! Fuck him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsLeopard Donating Member (717 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #12
20. And Obama gave him the Medal of Honor
Edited on Sun Aug-14-11 10:14 AM by MsLeopard
Again. :puke:

Edit: typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
41. He gets choked up at funerals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #9
27. Crime family........nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberty Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
11. or maybe he went to see his mistress...
My brother used to work in DC and said it was common knowledge Bush Sr had a honey in the State Dept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
13. Kick
For the rule of law
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. and the land where all men are created equal
:patriot:

back at ya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
16. Republicon OCCULTISM against America. As usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. Exactly. The hold-over from, shall we say, Prescott's Pals?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tennessee Gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
18. Of course Poppy was involved in the October Surprise.
Traitorous behavior. I have always believed that.

This link provides a wealth of information: Archive The October Surprise Mystery

http://www.consortiumnews.com/archive/xfile.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
19. If the secret got out, I predict that mainstream America wouldn't really care.
Seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. Did you miss the exchange over Iran in the (R) debate?
Edited on Sun Aug-14-11 10:29 AM by Motown_Johnny
video here where Santorum says Iran has been at war with us since 1979

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bAXBevBcwHU

the quote is at just about 2:58



Then it is followed up with Paul saying we have been at war with Iran even longer than that



So Reagan/Bush giving arms to a country we were at war with just might be something people would care about (not that it is accurate but it is a good talking point).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #22
30. It's even more insidious than that. In 1985 (at the height of the
Edited on Sun Aug-14-11 11:58 AM by coalition_unwilling
Iran-Iraq War), Reagan sent Donald Rumsfeld to Saddam Hussein's Iraq as a special envoy to pave the way for America to re-establish relations with Iraq and provide it with military intel about Iranian troop deployments.

So, at the same time we're providing arms to the Iraninas (the infamous 'arms for hostages' quid pro quo that was the precursor to Iran Contra) . . . at the exact same time we're providing critical military intelligence to Iraq.

In other words, we were aiding both sides to fight one another to a bloody stalemate.

If you think people in the Middle East are not aware of this moral abomination, of this perfidy, then I have a bridge in Brooklyn for sale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #19
26. Seriously
You are so right. Many don't remember or don't really understand what happened. It was just SO long ago and most people probably wouldn't care anymore.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #19
37. I'd sadly have to agree. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
28. I think Parry has busted the October Surprise open.
His series of articles lately is based upon the discovery of a memo in the Bush the Smarter Presidential records stating that William Casey had, in fact, gone to Madrid when he went to his deathbed claiming he didn't.

Think of the ramifications of that: the Era of Saint Ronnie was inaugurated by secretly negotiating a deal to keep fifty Americans in captivity for an extra 100 days, in order to steal an election by swinging public opinion against President Carter.

That's a hangin' offense, one that directly led to a thousand others over the past thirty years. I sure hope Robert Parry has a dead-man's switch....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. Yup. But it is akin to a tree falling in the corporate woods...
Edited on Sun Aug-14-11 11:50 AM by SpiralHawk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Yes, very sad.
What bothers me the most is that these arguments almost always devolve into authority-sniping instead of consideration of the evidence uncovered. Americans are so conditioned to trust what authorities tell them that when those authorities are discovered to be gaming the table, people simply ignore it.

Confusion works. Lying works. Destroying evidence works. And everything we've lost over the past three decades is the direct result of that pattern of deception.

A hundred million Americans are now eight weeks away from starvation, and scarcely a damned one of them understands why. They'll die not knowing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. "100 million Americans are 8 weeks away from starvation?" - Huh?
what's that statement all about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. We can't distribute the food we have without gasoline...
...and over the past 30 years, the food distribution network has been completely taken over by a corporate owned, for-profit infrastructure that will instantly cut off deliveries to anyplace too far away, too difficult to reach, too wracked by violence to approach, or politically expedient to deny.

So the moment there is a major disruption in the flow of refined fuels, the clock starts ticking for about one-third of all Americans, by my own best guess.

But it's mostly paranoid hyperbole! That's how I do.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. KGB documents from that era backs the report, as well. US media downplayed or ignored that tidbit.
Edited on Sun Aug-14-11 12:37 PM by blm
The KGB documents were revealed in the late 90s, iirc. Corporate media, always there to protect BushInc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Citizen Worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
34. Barbara Honegger's book, October Surprise, reveals much of Reagan/Bush pre-election traitorous acts
and she was a policy analyst in the Reagan White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #34
50. Excellent Book. October Surprise (R) -- against America
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
38. You know, it makes one want to give up. If we were to pursue this,
or any other outrage, and the government actually prosecuted, it would be one transgression among countless, and current treacherous acts are continuing to take place all the time. What's the analogy? Something about stomping out little fires while the forest is ablaze, or something like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
43. He flew on an SR-71 didn't he? That's what I read. There's even videotape of it somewhere. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brother Buzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. That's what Russbacher, the pilot, claimed
The Blackbird was employed for the return flight only.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanonRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
44. This to me is when we started to lose the rule of law.
This heinous crime went unpunished, as did, largely, the Iran-Contra scandal. Now we have a vast array of offical crimes being uninvestigated and unpunished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
47. Maybe he was having a tryst with Phyllis Schlafly
or some other female right wing hornet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YankmeCrankme Donating Member (576 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
48. As much as I believe Bush and Reagan's team could of done this, I have one nagging doubt.
Edited on Sun Aug-14-11 04:21 PM by YankmeCrankme
Why haven't the Iranians ever said anything about this? I can understand at the time, they were getting something for something, but what about a few years later when the US shot down their airliner? You'd think they would want to do something against the US, maybe try to humiliate Reagan and I think coming out that they sabotaged the hostage situation for Carter would have looked very bad even if Reagan was popular and it would have sunk Bush's presidential ambitions, one would think.

So, why haven't the Iranians ever disclosed any dealings with Reagan or Bush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-11 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. Why would they want to reveal to their own people...

that they had been dealing with the "The Great Satan"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC