|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
bvar22 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-13-11 12:33 PM Original message |
The BEST thing that could happen for the Political Future of the Democratic Party... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-13-11 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
1. It won't be "junk insurance." The benefits will be standardized |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-13-11 01:10 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. It IS "Junk Insurance" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-13-11 01:53 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. I was uninsured for a year, because the premiums for high-deductible insurance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-13-11 02:26 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. Protection is right, it's a racket. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrispyQ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-14-11 11:49 AM Response to Reply #6 |
23. "...I have a very high deductible policy strictly as asset protection. " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scuba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-13-11 01:42 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. "Insurance" is a euphemism for "junk insurance". n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-13-11 02:23 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Here is the "junk" part for many. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-14-11 03:11 AM Response to Reply #10 |
20. I went the shitty insurance route, hoping I can hold out until 11/1/2011 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-14-11 03:09 AM Response to Reply #1 |
19. "Bronze" pays only 60% of costs, and that sure the hell IS junk insurance n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northoftheborder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-13-11 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
2. There will be no way to hold costs in check. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-13-11 01:27 PM Response to Original message |
4. ... would be Obama running as a Republican. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-13-11 02:13 PM Response to Original message |
7. Truth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-13-11 02:17 PM Response to Original message |
8. Thank you. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alsame (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-13-11 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
9. I agree with you 100%, but I'm afraid the SCOTUS will uphold |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-13-11 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
12. But..but..Obama made a great deal with the pharma industry to get it passed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-13-11 06:41 PM Response to Original message |
13. SCOTUS ain't ever going to kill the opportunity for their buddies who head |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-13-11 06:42 PM Response to Original message |
14. K & R and I do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-13-11 06:53 PM Response to Original message |
15. knr - can we discuss a national HC plan for all :( n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-13-11 07:07 PM Response to Original message |
16. absolutely! the mandate was/is unacceptable w/o a robust Public Option (which voters were promised) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
swilton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-13-11 07:12 PM Response to Original message |
17. AMEN! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-13-11 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
18. ALERT: The private insurers are taking over! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GeorgeGist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-14-11 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
21. That's the BEST you came up with? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-14-11 10:20 AM Response to Original message |
22. K & R. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
area51 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-14-11 12:22 PM Response to Original message |
24. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:47 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC