Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was Obama's remark about what would Reagan do during the debt talks a freudian slip

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 09:51 PM
Original message
Was Obama's remark about what would Reagan do during the debt talks a freudian slip
as to his true political leanings or just him trying to sound like a moderate?

It just strikes me as od that in a moment of frustration and anger he would be thinking of Ronald Reagan and not someone like FDR or Teddy Roosevelt. Was it a freudian slip or him just trying to sound like a moderate to conservatives?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Obama attempts to use examples from the right to make his case to those on the right, but
the problem is the fact that he's really bad at it. He thinks he's throwing water on the fire, but he often mistakes gasoline for water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I think you are right. Since Obama doesn't seem to get frustrated much
he probably is always thinking of something to say to win those on the right over. Probably wasn't a freudian slip at all because he doesn't get to the point where his sub-conscious speaks first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adhd_what_huh Donating Member (368 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh dear god...spare me from this continued nonsense at DU
amen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Perhaps you need a nap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adhd_what_huh Donating Member (368 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. maybe a stiff drink.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Salut!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-11 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. You don't need dear god. Just don't click on DU.
Edited on Mon Aug-08-11 12:25 AM by Jakes Progress
Problem solved. You can save yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-11 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. poor baby
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. He wants the Reagan Democrats in the next election. And all the independents. He needs them. Then
he can govern how he likes once he has a filibuster proof super majority.

I just wish that darned Mitt Romney would get out of the way and let the lovely Michelle Bachmann run for President. I was hopeful he had been caught in some financial scandal yesterday, but alas, I was wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Middle finga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. And what would Obama do with a super majority in his 2nd
Term, blow it like he blew the first one? Filibuster proof senate is an excuse used by the democrats. When Republicans are in control, they seemed to find away to get their shit passed without a super majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. What's wrong with the FDR voters who put him into office?
Democrats, Republicans, Independents. You know, those people who gave him a mandate when he campaigned on 'universal' healthcare, jobs, taxing the rich...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Mandate? Mandates are for republicans.
Who hands out mandates? The vox populi: our noble and fairly balanced mass media controls the zeitgeist.

W "won" in 2000 with 49% of the popular vote, and governed like he was the right hand of God Almighty with full Mandate blessings from our kingmaker media establishment.

Obama WON in 2008 54% of the popular vote, a substantial Democratic majority in the house, and damn close to 60 votes in the senate. That same media was on his case from November 5 onward, carefully reassuring the public that he'd step on eggshells around the very patriotic but rightfully upset republican 46%.

When W "won" I didn't hear any crap from them about a "team of rivals" from the liberal media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
11. I wish he promised to do what reagan did in the
Deficit Reduction Act of 1984

It was 82% revenue increases, just 18% cuts.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-07-15/obama-s-deficit-offer-about-as-good-as-they-get-jared-bernstein.html

(He even set maximum estate tax rate at 55 percent, much higher than now)

So maybe he hopes republicans remember that.
(though of course they don't seem to recall anything that doesn't fit their myth)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
12. When Obama tries to explain to GOPers in terms they use and know
without startling their only two emotions, fear and anger, they explode with blind rage before he can get to mentioning his point. Mostly it goes across from local RWingers as racist hatred, pure and burning. At least they don't want to talk about the Civil War all day long. It is failure to communicate on the GOPers part, '98% of the time' as they like to boast. It is recorded history.

Caused quite a stir, let me tell ya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalidurga Donating Member (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-11 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. I don't know whether to laugh or cry...
when Obama reaches out to Republicans it's like putting your hand in a piranha tank to calm the little fishies down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-11 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. I am laughing, it seems that no matter what Obama does
the GOPers come out with something horrible to their PR campaign (whatever that is). Just the fact that the GOP is proud of a 98% refusal to work with Dems, should hurt them next year like crazyfire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-11 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
14. POTUS Obama has no moral nor scientific center and is
a scramble suit of what is acceptable.

I see a man that "winning" or "closing the deal" is more important than the actual policy and impact or direction of the policy.

Reagan was an morally vacuous and back stabbing individual long before he was a willing tool against most People.

Gov. Jerry Brown said this AM for POTUS Obama to listen to his soul and do the right thing even if there was a strong possibility of losing.

Brown could have chosen to destroy POTUS Obama on CNN Sunday AM and instead protected with obvious nuances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC