Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Apple holding more cash than USA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 11:31 AM
Original message
Apple holding more cash than USA


This is what happens under our current tax system when the top 1% is allowed to hoard almost a trillion dollars while millions look for work and scrape by. All that money just sitting there. And this is just one company our of thousands.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-14340470
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. Although this is one company that does employ
Americans in America in their chain of stores unlike other manufacturers. If we can get them to start manufacturing their products here in the USA, it would be wonderful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. And they would manufacture here if they could lock us in the factories and pay us 60 cents a day
Edited on Sun Aug-07-11 11:40 AM by notadmblnd
But most of us wouldn't tolerate that so they hire in China instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yet many here are still enamored of protectionism
Suppose Apple did produce all of its products in the US, paying laborers a fair wage and covering
worker benefits. The price of its product would necessarily increase, its profitability would fall,
and it would be more difficult for Apple to grow its business and hire more workers. This is especially
true if Chinese companies had unfettered access to our retail market. Apple would have a hard time
competing.

Now suppose in our desire to "protect American workers" we place tariffs on Chinese goods to increase
their prices relative to American goods. That makes all prices go up, and consumers are absolutely
worse off.

Protectionism to shield American workers makes us all worse off as consumers, unambiguously.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yeah, that way instead of making things like iPods Americans can make coffee.
Edited on Sun Aug-07-11 11:57 AM by originalpckelly
You do realize that American workers are American consumers, right, you noodilynoob?

We can find efficiency by eliminating management and letting workplace markets take care of the job. Let the market manage workers, not planners like managers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Then enjoy your high prices and high unemployment. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. High prices have nothing to do with what you pay
for employment. Prices are governed by what people are willing to pay for stuff, and what that stuff costs wholesale, nothing else. I was in business at one time and had employees. Every time minimum wage went up, or my rent for that matter, it was not reflected in my prices. My prices were what I could get for my product. If I couldn't sell enough to pay my overhead and make a profit, then I had to go back an analyze where I was. I never had to lay any one off though. I did raise my prices when the wholesale cost of my product went up, but it was across the board because everyone in the same business also raised their prices when that happened. If you can't pay your bills including employment then you close shop. It means the business is unsustainable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Apple could probably manufacture all of its products in the U.S. and...
...pay 100,000 employees fair wages, with benefits, and still have plenty of that nearly one trillion dollars to spare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Um, no, the cash reserves are in the billions and are 76 billion dollars.
They could definitely manage hiring more American workers, that I agree with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I didn't read the article.
The OP referred to the figure of "nearly a trillion," which is substantially more that $76 billion. But even so, assuming an average of $60,000 per employee, $2.8 billion dollars would cover 46,000 workers--the number of Apple employees in 2010. That still leaves a big chunk of its $76 billion reserves to fund manufacturing and administrative facilities in the U.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Of course, you are right.
I just like to get the numbers right. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. My mistake on it being almost a trillion.


Had forgotten it takes a thousand billions to make a trillion, not 100. I agree with what you just said 100%! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. I wasn't considering protectionism, my concern is with the exploitation of human beings
I would have absolutely no problem with manufacturing overseas if corporations had to treat employees fairly. Fair Trade, not Free Trade. I do believe that more companies would keep jobs here if it weren't for them being able to exploit the labor market in other countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. If production costs were similar everywhere, jobs would come back.
But prices would be higher. Tariffs would magnify the problem and create less competition and therefore less incentive to lower prices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Ah yes, so you want American workers to work for a $1 an hour.
That's probably what the equilibrium would be.

We see your brilliant ideas on display with our nice little recessions.

Tariffs may not be a good idea, but America has to learn a lesson or two here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. When did I say that? Show me. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. You know what? I don't really care wha he price of something is if I really want it
And I wouldn't mind making 60 cents an hour if it would pay the rent, utilities, food and put gas in the car.:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. during the gilded age the fat pigs actually bailed out the country
once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Only because they knew they too would go down with
the ship. Our fat cats don't seem to be aware of that, or they have a Plan B to fall back on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Their plan B, is more like plan m...
They plan to move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. The US operates at a deficit, why should it have lots of cash lying around ? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cal Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
16. Capitalism, baby!
The state only exists to protect Apple's ability to do this.

'The state' is, sort of ironically, going bankrupt (and the people suffer- AUSTERITY!!1!) because of the all money it spends to protect the interests of capitalist industry by waging wars and ensuring they pay little or no tax on their profit.

It's all trickle-up.

The vast majority of people get poorer and poorer as Apple and just a few hundred other families and corporations own unprecedented proportions of the world's resources and wealth.

This is inevitable. Our economic system is twisted as hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC