Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Inside Counsel (Corporate Attorney Trade Mag) - "Pro-union NLRB alarms employers" - Go Democrats!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 10:32 AM
Original message
Inside Counsel (Corporate Attorney Trade Mag) - "Pro-union NLRB alarms employers" - Go Democrats!
I know there are a lot of talking points on DU pushing the false equivalency idea that President Obama and Democrats are no different than Republicans, and they have not really helped or tried to help unions. Yet, outside of the political pundits, here is a trade magazine among corporate counsel expressing alarm and concern about the pro-union bias of the NLRB, which now has a Democratic majority. Again, what is interesting is that this appears in a trade magazine for corporate counsel.

http://www.insidecounsel.com/2011/08/01/pro-union-nlrb-alarms-employers


Ask almost any veteran management-side labor attorney about the current National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and he will make two points: First, the board always shifts from favoring business to favoring unions when control of the White House changes, and second, the current board has made an unusually sharp shift to the left.

“The NLRB has traditionally swung a pendulum back and forth depending on which party is in power, and that’s historical back to the founding of the NLRB,” says Charles Caulkins, a partner at Fisher & Phillips.

That’s because the president appoints the board, with three members from his own party and two from the opposition party. The current board has four members—three Democrats and one Republican—with a vacancy in the fifth position. All three Democratic members have strong union ties, and two were given recess appointments when it appeared they would not be confirmed by the Senate. Subsequent proposed rulemakings and case decisions reflect that pro-union tilt.

“The unions claim that previous boards were very pro-employer and this is payback, but I think this board is going far beyond what previous boards have done,” says Hal Coxson, a shareholder at Ogletree Deakins.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Odd - No Comment On A Trade Industry Publication Complaining About Pro-Union NLRB?
This isn't some political pundit. This is the actual trade magazine for corporate counsel, and this is what they are discussing amongst themselves, the most pro-union NLRB in decades, which just underscores why Republicans are going all in to try to destroy Democrats, because they have been progressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC