|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-06-11 09:45 AM Original message |
Immagine how strong this country would be with 1/10th of its current military |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Desertrose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-06-11 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
1. It just seems so logical to me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
izquierdista (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-06-11 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
2. Then what would they do with the VA? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-06-11 09:50 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Lavish it with money until the last Veteran died of natural causes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleanhippie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-06-11 11:13 AM Response to Reply #3 |
12. Winner! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Motown_Johnny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-06-11 09:53 AM Response to Original message |
4. why not just have people in the military inspect the meat? and build the bridges |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-06-11 09:56 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Because people in the military are slaves. Let them out first then they can do the work. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jkid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-06-11 10:55 AM Response to Reply #4 |
8. That's a similar idea I was thinking of. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluebuzzard (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-06-11 09:56 AM Response to Original message |
6. not going to change under this administration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NutmegYankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-06-11 10:11 AM Response to Original message |
7. The problem is those people would not be replaced in industry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indepat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-06-11 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
9. But the US could not exert global hegemony with 1/10th its current military |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blindpig (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-06-11 11:11 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Our Capitalists wouldn't like that at all. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-06-11 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
11. The military is there to protect the wealthy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 07:20 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC