Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Economist Robert Frank on Rachel Maddow -- "The answer is straightforward."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 08:25 PM
Original message
Economist Robert Frank on Rachel Maddow -- "The answer is straightforward."
Edited on Thu Aug-04-11 08:27 PM by Armstead
(Paraphrased) It isn't all that complicated, and the solution is at hand. Inject some demand in the economy via government programs. That would put people to work and stimulate business. And lenders are eager to finance it at low interest. The people are available, the machines are idle and ready and materials are at a relativly low cost these days.

Unfortunately that is not the political tone these days.


-------

my comment: nnnnnnnnnnngh. Where are our leaders on this? Pimping for deficit reduction with the GOP instead of selling this to the American people.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. "What we're doing now is just unimaginably stupid."
Can't say it plainer than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. yeah I forgot to mention that part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R, will find & post video here later nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Also, it will be run at midnite EST
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why do you (collective) think the market has been crashing for the last 4 days?
We told the global economy that we were tying austerity measures (without revenue increases) to the debt ceiling.

That said in effect "the employer of last resort is no longer hiring".

I hope they enjoy their 5 week vacation. They may not recognize this country when they get back.

/madmax
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. Costs $25 billion to borrow $1 trillion and $250 billion for another percentage point rise in
unemployment. Ten times higher. Did I hear that right?

Yet another bit of info we might have shared with the public while this bullshit saga was playing out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I caught that, but was a little confused, I must admit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lifelong Protester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Yes, I thought that was a VERY good point to be shared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. true, but it'll get lost in all the Voodoo Math that's going around
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. We don't even need to borrow.
We have a sovereign currency so the government can spend without the need for revenue or borrowing. They did it to help bail out the banks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chimichurri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's by design.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. For some reason I have hope there will be an infrastructure program in the works from the Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I hope you are correct
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. I never understood why Obama gave up on the "Shovel Ready Jobs" right after Inauguration...
Edited on Thu Aug-04-11 10:00 PM by KoKo
At first I thought he had so much to deal with the shit that Bush left him with the Market/Global Bankster Fraud Meltdown...and then I thought it was because he was honoring Ted Kennedy by getting the Health Care Bill for All pushed through Congress...that it was just too much on his plate.

But, as I saw him cozying up to the same folks on Wall Street who helped cause this Crisis...and even putting them in his administration...and time when by and no prosecutions occurred to the criminals and only Bernie Madoff went to prison...and more time went by and Tim Geithner was all over the place defending that we had gone through a crisis talking for the Pres..and well...the rest you know.

Somehow the "Shovel Ready Jobs" he went on an on about in his Campaign Speeches seemed to get buried.

Someone put the hex or halt on those jobs programs and decided to do two very WEAK Stimuli...that mostly went to the Banks...and somehow it all disappeared...

Something happened...but, I've got to assume he didn't really believe in "Shovel Ready Jobs" but that his clever Speech Writer thought it sounded good and had recently Googled FDR and the Great Depression and somehow read about the WPA and thought it sounded good at the time for a Presidential Candidate to say in a speech. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. There was some of that...Where I live we're getting Rural Broadband Network from it
and numerous other projects that have had a positive impact, including creating and/or saving jobs.

What cheesed me off was 1)he described it as a temporary "necessary evil" and 2)He backed off almost immediately and didn't keep hammering home that the stimulus was doing good and helping the economy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. That's good news for you.... One thing though...here in NC
his FCC Chair is trying to shut out community Broadband where a local NC Community got together and put in high speed for their small city and Rural. Another Community in NC did the same. AT&T didn't like it and the RW Chamber of Commerce Groups got a bill in to stop them.

So...it's good you got something out of the Stimulous...but local communities here who put together their own Broadband are getting cut out by ATT and Verizon.. :shrug:

Anyway...glad to seem some stimulous did go to some communities.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarsInHerHair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. take back precinct committee membership
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Here also...
Edited on Thu Aug-04-11 11:48 PM by Armstead
...communities all along the path of this network are also forming local publicly-owned municipal utilities to build and own the local networks that will go to individual homes and businesses.

Good to live in a blue state, I guess.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tex-wyo-dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Well, here's at least part of the problem...
(IMO, of course)...

As soon as it became clear that Obama was going to get the nomination in 2008, immediately the RW mobilized a smear campaign to convince the crazies that he was a socialist, marxist, maoist, communist, 60's radical (remember Bill Ayers), black panther, etc, etc, etc....

Although this was all crazy-talk to most, it effectively put a bug in people's ear. As soon as Obama tried to do anything even remotely progressive, the echo chamber stood ready to scream "I told you so.". They will stop at nothing to destroy Obama's presidency and I think it may have something to do with why he hasn't taken bolder measures.

The other problem is that big money owns the media and he message (and all of Washington for that matter).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Could be...but he had Dem House and Senate that many of us worked hard to get for him...
Why didn't he and Biden (who had great Senate Powers from having served so long) use the power?

That's what so many of us are wondering. Plus, he ran for election for almost two years...and had Center for American Progress (Center Left Think Tank) folks advising him and they for sure knew what the Repugs were about because I was on their E-Mail Blog List for three years and they had the scoop on the criminal element of the Repugs.

He had Tom Daschle who had been Senate Leader over Read for Years...advising him. And, Obama, himself, was in the Senate for two years.

So...he had to have known what he'd be up against. How could he not? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tex-wyo-dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. I know what you mean and wish I could answer that...
He (and all Dems for that matter) are up against a massive media and propoganda infrastructure that are very much against government in general, particularly progressive government. Early on in his presidency, Obama tried to subvert the echo chamber by giving televised speaches and other media events constantly. He has also made several attempts at showing just how radical the rethugs are (corporate jets was the lastest), all in an effort to win the message game. He seems to have abandoned most of these efforts, maybe, rightly or wrongly, thinking they were losing the battle,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarsInHerHair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
19. our 'leaders' are busy with Hooverism, that path has led the UK into a double
dip into recession...........really verging towards Depression
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
23. VIDEO OF INTERVIEW WITH R FRANK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC