Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Poll: Muslims, atheists most likely to reject violence

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Playinghardball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 10:51 AM
Original message
Poll: Muslims, atheists most likely to reject violence
Source: Raw Story
By Stephen C. Webster

Tags: barack obama, gallup survey, protestant christiansNew data from polling firm Gallup shows that out of all the religious groups in the U.S., Muslims are most likely to reject violence, followed by the non-religious atheists and agnostics.

Through interviews with 2,482 Americans, Gallup found that 78 percent of Muslims believe violence which kills civilians is never justified, whereas just 38 percent of Protestant Christians and 39 percent of Catholics agreed with that sentiment. Fifty-six percent of atheists answered similarly.

When Gallup put the question a bit more pointedly, asking if it would be justified for "an individual person or a small group of persons to target and kill civilians," the responses were a bit more uniform. Respondents from nearly all groups were widely opposed to such tactics, with Protestants and Catholics at 71 percent against. Muslims still had the highest number opposed, at 89 percent. Seventy-six percent of atheists were also opposed.

The Gallup survey, conducted over the course of a year, was designed to measure religious and non-religious attitudes toward violence 10 years after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/08/03/poll-muslims-atheists-most-likely-to-reject-violence/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. Big kick for this one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
divvy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. Looks like the Blood-Thirsty Christian rules
Edited on Wed Aug-03-11 10:55 AM by divvy
Not too suprised really. They eat Jesus's body and drink his blood. They want your soul. Sounds like the devil to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think the Muslim response may be reflexively defensive
Edited on Wed Aug-03-11 11:09 AM by dmallind
When you belong to a group that has for a decade been portrayed as ready to commit and applaud terrorism, and are asked by an organization that is not Muslim whether it's OK to target civilians, how likely are you to consider all possible options and offer a controversial answer, and how likely to immediately recoil from the implication that negative public opinion about your group has any merit? I don't think Muslims as a group are any more violent or OK with violence than Christians, but I have doubts that they are nigh twice as pacifist too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. so the Muslims are lying and the Christians aren't? Ok then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Not really - the Muslims may, with good reason, be more sensitive to questions about violence though
If the survey were about polygamy I'd expect Mormons to be more defensive. If it were about pedophilia, Catholics instead, and so on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napoleon_in_rags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. This is a scary poll for so many reasons.
They all come together on the question of killing civilians, but still 29% of Christians and 11% of Muslims support? The crazy part is "are there any members of Al Qaeda in your church/mosque" 40% of Christians say yes??? So 4 in 10 Christians go to their little church on Sunday, smile pretty, while looking sideways at the rest of congregation knowing somebody there is with Al Qaeda???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. I'm prety sure that number reflects Christians who believe there are AQ members in US mosques. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napoleon_in_rags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #7
17. Bad wording then:
Edited on Wed Aug-03-11 12:34 PM by napoleon_in_rags
Perhaps most tellingly, 92 percent of Muslims surveyed said they did not believe any Muslim in their community had sympathy toward al Qaeda terrorists, but just 56 percent of Protestants and 63 percent of Catholics said the same.

That sentence says that 63 of Catholics said "the same", in reference to "their community". When I hear that 40% of Muslims admit to sniffing "their own armpits" but only 30% of Christians admit to "the same", I assume 30% of Christians are admitting to sniffing their own armpits, not the armpits of the Muslims. This poll is less scary if you are right though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rrneck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. Industrialized warfare
does it's responsibility dispersion magic. Collateral damage is fine as long as you say you didn't mean to do it.

It's just more civilized to hire out your crimes against humanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blkmusclmachine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. .
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
10. Many DUers believe targeting citizens is OK.
Look at any Japan/nuke thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. *I* believe targeting civilians CAN be OK
The question in any ethical dilemma is to reduce the harm or maximize the benefit. If killing 50 can save 100, it's a good choice. Whether those 50 wear uniforms or not is irrelevant. Pretty damn rare I'd grant you, but certainly not impossible (say for example 50 civilian workers are demolishing a bridge which is the only escape route for 100 soldiers doomed to die if the bridge is unavailable for escape). If one is unwilling to make the right choice in the 50/100 example, haven't you simply killed the additional 50?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. No, targeting civilians is against my ethics.
I don't care about hypothetical scenarios. I care about real life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. You honestly think killing civilians has never saved lives in real life?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. I did not say that.
On an issue as important as killing people, I would rather look at real life scenarios than hypothetical scenarios.

I believe history shows targeting civilians causes more death than not targeting civilians. The whole picture needs to be examined, so we see the results of a kill-civilian-mentality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
11. I guess they didn't poll any Quakers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. They'd be in the 38% I suspect. How many should be included? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. I guess they'd be considered Protestant but they are explicitly committed to non-violence.
It wouldn't be just a percentage of them, it would be all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr Dixon Donating Member (51 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
15. Nice
Well now i'm guessing the GOP will not agree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
21. Only a third of Democrats are religious bigots, vs half of the Republicans - woo hoo!
"Perhaps most tellingly, 92 percent of Muslims surveyed said they did not believe any Muslim in their community had sympathy toward al Qaeda terrorists, but just 56 percent of Protestants and 63 percent of Catholics said the same."

"A Pew poll found in August of 2010 that just 30 percent of Americans have a favorable view of Muslims. Republicans lead the divide, at 54 percent who hold unfavorable views, compared to 27 percent of Democrats."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
22. Sounds about right. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC