Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fukushima radiation 1,000 times H-Bomb peak

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 09:16 AM
Original message
Fukushima radiation 1,000 times H-Bomb peak

http://www.intrepidreport.com/archives/2753


-snip-

Busby certifies the poisonous, radioactive Japanese air to be at least 300 times worse than the air during the Chernobyl nuclear reactor disaster. Dr Janette Sherman, a highly respected physician and an acknowledged expert in radiation exposure, has estimated the world wide Chernobyl Kill to be at least one million people killed to date. The Chernobyl Disaster occurred April 26, 1986.

-snip-

The earth’s few nuclear states detonated a total of 2,045 Atomic and Hydrogen Bombs. During the period before international treaties shut them down, the US detonated more than 1,300 nuclear weapons “tests,” first in Japan at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, next in the South Pacific, then largely in Nevada, USA. The Nevada site is in the South Western US 60 miles, or 96.5 km, from Las Vegas.

The H-Bomb fallout spread first northeastward with the prevailing winds; then went around the world. Yes, the US Department of Energy, DOE, lists the unwarranted Atomic Bomb attack at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan as “Tests.”

-vary informative snip-
-------------------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. Not much of a source for this "information."
Busby is the director of Green Audit, an environmental consultancy agency, and scientific advisor to the Low Level Radiation Campaign (LLRC) which he set up in 1995.

Busby SET - Second Event Theory - argues that radiation is far more damaging than other researchers have found. That theory has been rejected by refereed journals because of

The lack of biological plausibility for the basic preconditions of the SET
The paucity of supporting evidence in the proponents’ reviews of the SET
The weakness of studies cited in support of the SET
The absence of supporting evidence found by the independent review commissioned by the Committee

He's a wacko.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. Junk science...nt
Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. Thank you, ensho. The world press corpse largely seems to be missing this story...
EXCERPT...

The estimates must be considered as conservative or low since the smallest particles go through the car air filters and emerge from the car’s exhaust. The smallest radioactive particles simply go through a human’s skin or go to the bottom of a human’s lungs and stay there. The poison radiates cells within a range extending 20 cells deep in all directions. The dead and dying or mutated cells become cancers and hundreds of other radiation related diseases.

Gee. That's something more people need to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Wow! You really have no respect for science.
Your post: "The estimates must be considered as conservative or low since the smallest particles go through the car air filters and emerge from the car’s exhaust." seems to rely on the idea that scientists don't know where radiation goes when they estimate the effect of that radiation - but YOU do know.

Crackpot science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Wow! You really have no respect for human life.
My reply was taken from OP's article. FYFI:

Any amount of radiation is dangerous to human.

The crack in your integrity is showing, robcon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC