Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mark Halperin's BACK On MSNBC!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Segami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:13 PM
Original message
Mark Halperin's BACK On MSNBC!


Mark Halperin returns to MSNBC sometime this week, after serving his month-long suspension for calling the president a "dick," on "Morning Joe,



:smoke: :smoke:

" Poor Mark Halperin's summer vacation ends this week. The famous political analyst who doesn't understand politics and is wrong about everything will be back on MSNBC sometime this week, after serving his month-long suspension for calling the president a "dick," on "Morning Joe," on July 30. I had sort of hoped, a month ago, that MSNBC would just quietly not ever lift the suspension, or maybe they would all forget that MSNBC ever even employed Mark Halperin. Not to be! Soon, Mark will be back on "Morning Joe" where he will cover politics like a horse race, as covered by someone who had never seen a horse race.

Mark has surely learned his lesson, and from now on he'll be politely wrong about everything, constantly.


http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/08/02/halperin_back



.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SusanaMontana41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. He's the one who told Obama to ignore his base in 2010.
He said, "Where are they gonna go?"

His base didn't go to the polls, for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Segami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. This says it all..
"......political analyst who doesn't understand politics and is wrong about everything...."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SusanaMontana41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Yup. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. yep. see what that rationale achieved....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SusanaMontana41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. He sucked the enthusiasm out of a generation of voters,
many of whom would have walked through fire for him.

Don't blame them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. yes, it's amazing the uncaring attitude many of the young people take now, after this past 2 years
of ridiculousness in conceding much to the other side, as if it appears P.O. agrees with them on many of the issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SusanaMontana41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. My son was an enthusiastic supporter. Now he's crushed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. sigh... well, hopefully things change. I sure as heck don't want the raving lunatics in charge of
senate and the WH. If he fought though as hard as he sounded like he would in the primaries and gen. election, many people would feel differently.

tell him (son) not to give up fighting for progressive change, no matter if our elected folks don't always live up to what we want them to every time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. that's another slur on liberals.
Edited on Tue Aug-02-11 10:20 PM by provis99
Liberals turned out in high numbers in 2010. It was the damned moderate and conservative Democrats who sat on their asses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SusanaMontana41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. No, it wasn't. 23 million young people voted in 2008.
Only 9 million voted in 2010.

When Democrats vote, Democrats win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. that is irrelevant. Liberals turned out in high numbers.
"3. The liberal-moderate-conservative numbers in 2008 were 22%, 44% and 34%. Those numbers for yesterday were 20%, 39% and 41%. A big conservative jump, but in all likelihood because liberals didn't vote in big numbers."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/michaeltomasky/2010/nov/03/us-midterm-elections-2010-turnout-says-a-lot

Liberals make up 18% of the voting population, so their turnout in both 2008 and 2010 was higher than their proportion in the population. The moderates failed to turn out in the midterm elections, as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SusanaMontana41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. 14 million voters are irrelevant? Okaay ... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. it is ridiculous to assume all 14 million are liberals.
Edited on Tue Aug-02-11 10:33 PM by provis99
Likely, the young are roughly 3-5% more liberal for their age cohort than are older age cohorts, which is a nearly insignificant difference given the entire spectrum of the electorate numbers.

"The pollsters for Harvard also asked questions on 20 different issues that they used to determine the political ideologies of today's young adults. Two of those ideologies were consistent with traditional political parties: the "new conservatives" (most like Republicans), representing about 13 percent of the young adults, and the "new progressives" (most like Democrats), making up about 17 percent...The largest ideological group was the "new passives," which made up 40 percent of all the young adults surveyed."
http://chronicle.com/article/College-Students-Agree-With/64565/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yet Adolf Buchannan remains on the payroll...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Halpern comes back to MSNBC the same time it decides to refer to POTUS as "Boy"
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC