Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Let's call them what they are: job destroyers.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 07:02 PM
Original message
Let's call them what they are: job destroyers.
The 1%, both in and out of Congress, don't give a shit about job creation. If their delicate ears can no longer bear to hear the class-war term "rich" :eyes:, I think we should refer to them as "job destroyers", not "job creators".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Parasites. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Useless greeders. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Job Cremators:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Good one! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I think in history, capitalism will be seen as a great failure. It will be
Edited on Tue Aug-02-11 07:21 PM by RKP5637
replaced. The "system" is just not going to hack it for the 21st century. It worked better with smaller populations, less globalization and less contrived/rigged markets. The inequities of capitalism are inherent in the model by definition.

A skewed wealth distribution is a given with manipulative unregulated behavior, but the advantaged will control most of the power and hence the system survives, and many will lose.

And that's the way the system works IMO under capitalism.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. A linear system . . .
. . . that depends on perpetual growth fueled by infinite resources, infinite cheap energy and infinite wealth in a world where none of those things exist. What could POSSIBLY go wrong? :sarcasm:

The only way this ever could have remotely worked is with regular and progressive redistribution of wealth, ready replacements for the outgoing careers, constant invention, regulation, universal health care and universal education.

Unfortunately, the human element of greed rendered all of what could have helped it dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
socialist_n_TN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yep. The big thing is the perpetual growth part of it
Which is running up against FINITE resources in all areas, energy and hard resources included. It was a step up from feudalism because it allowed for a more efficient growth of wealth, but now...not so much. NOW we need a better way to distribute that wealth. Socialism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Yep, it's kind of like riding down the tracks on a train headed toward a train wreck. I was
talking with someone on DU about this one night and they said similar, "the human element of greed rendered all of what could have helped it dead."

And they said similar of all '-isms' ... that human greed does just about all systems in. Ha, what we need is a tamper proof system, but who would hold the keys to that one? Maybe Diebold voting systems? LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. ...
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
socialist_n_TN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. Yeah, I thought of something similiar a couple of weeks ago
As in those "Job destroying tax cuts". I forgot to use that line in my meeting with Corker's staff today. Damn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC