Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Super Congress perfectly Sets Up ANOTHER Hostage Situation.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 04:00 PM
Original message
The Super Congress perfectly Sets Up ANOTHER Hostage Situation.
The WORST part of the New Super Congress is the No Amendments, Up or Down vote,
because that will allow them to put in some crumb like the Unemployment Extension Scam
to give cover for those casting a YES vote.

This perfectly sets up ANOTHER Hostage Situation,
which has been the very successful Kabuki for moving this country to the FAR RIGHT.
It has worked EVERY TIME so far.


THEN we will get to hear all the sorry excuses that have become so familiar,
as those who have sold us out Pose and Preen before the TV cameras,
patting each other on the back and congratulating each other for their courage,
while they expand their plans for the New Summer Home.

"I am on record for protecting Social Security, but I had to vote FOR this overall package." (because of the crumb)

"Why do you hate the unemployed?" (Or whoever this particular crumb will go to)

"This is "historic" reform legislation, look at all the good (crumbs) we got!"

"We couldn't let the Perfect be the Enemy of the Good."

"This is the best we could do under the circumstances."

"We didn't have the votes."

"This is a Step Forward."

"Today, we saved our children from a crushing deficit."

"We needed to get something done NOW."

"We will Fix it Later."

"Its ALL Joe Lieberman's fault."

"The American People wanted us to do this."

"We are HEROES for Standing Up to the Special Interests."
(like Old people)


Get Ready.
It is coming.


You will know them by their WORKS,
not by their excuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 04:01 PM
Original message
Rec n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. We should have a preemptive contest on guessing the upcoming DLC talking points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Welcome to DU.
May your brief stay be a happy one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoccoR5955 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. I can't wait for the first hurricane to hit Texas or Florida,
and then the President has to say that he cannot give them disaster relief, because we are working on a "balanced budget."
Perhaps then, they will realize that sometimes governments have to work at a slight deficit, if only to provide disaster relief to people.
These people are just so short sighted, it's not funny. The only time that they learn is when they get hurt. Pitiful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. There are specific clauses allowing exemptions for emergencies
and disasters in the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dtexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. As long as the GOP conrols the House, we're in a continuous hostage situation.
U.S. budget? Hostage situation.

Substantive legislation? The hostages will be killed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Let's teach them a lesson and stay home next election!
That'll show 'em!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Only as long as The Leadership WANTS a Hostage Situation.
*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Riiiight.
They did it all on purpose, riiiight.






This guy agrees with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. If that all you got, then... LOL
Hard Day in the Coal Mine?
Its GOTTA be hard work putting Lipstick on THIS Pig of a Debt Deal.
16 Tons and What do ya Get?



BTW:THIS guy really does agree with YOU!

Grover Norquist Backs The New Debt Deal

Have a Nice Day.








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. That guy is the poster boy for Sedition
In law, sedition is overt conduct, such as speech and organization, that is deemed by the legal authority to tend toward insurrection against the established order. Sedition often includes subversion of a constitution and incitement of discontent (or resistance) to lawful authority. Sedition may include any commotion, though not aimed at direct and open violence against the laws. Seditious words in writing are seditious libel. A seditionist is one who engages in or promotes the interests of sedition.

Typically, sedition is considered a subversive act, and the overt acts that may be prosecutable under sedition laws vary from one legal code to another. Where the history of these legal codes has been traced, there is also a record of the change in the definition of the elements constituting sedition at certain points in history. This overview has served to develop a sociological definition of sedition as well, within the study of state persecution.

The difference between sedition and treason consists primarily in the subjective ultimate object of the violation to the public peace. Sedition does not consist of levying war against a government nor of adhering to its enemies, giving enemies aid, and giving enemies comfort. Nor does it consist, in most representative democracies, of peaceful protest against a government, nor of attempting to change the government by democratic means (such as direct democracy or constitutional convention).

Sedition is the stirring up of rebellion against the government in power. Treason is the violation of allegiance to one's sovereign or state, giving aid to enemies, or levying war against one's state. Sedition is encouraging one's fellow citizens to rebel against their state, whereas treason is actually betraying one's country by aiding and abetting another state. Sedition laws somewhat equate to terrorism and public order laws.
Contents
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sedition
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Oh, I agree.
So WHY is the Democratic Party Leadership dancing to Grover's tune?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
27. Because they are not really Democrats?
We only have one party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Wait -- wasn't that Lawrence O'Donnell's BRILLIANT analysis?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. It will be a long time before O'Donnell lives THAT one down.
The O'Donnell Rope-A-Dope Strategy:
Obama Confused the Republicans by going further to The RIGHT then they were willing to go.
Brilliant.
The only thing missing from the Rope-A-Dope strategy was the Knock Out Punch at the end.

Without a Knock-Out Punch,
Rope-A-Dope is just timidly hanging on the ropes, not fighting back,
and letting the other guy beat you to death.

Yep,
O'Donnell will remember THAT one of a long time,
and I will be glad to help him remember.

He does appear to be compensating for the Rope-A-Dope embarrassment last week.
He blasted the Big Debt Ceiling Deal last night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Wait -- are you saying the Washington Post did not make this up
and O'Donnell is not briliant?

My world is collapsing around me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. undermines representative democracy, for starters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
16. That's the whole point. Now we can have one hostage drama after another. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
17. And think about how cheap it will be to buy off 7 politicians
instead of hundreds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
18. Oh that Ralph Nader. He ruined it for all of us forever.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Yes, he did. If not for him Gore would have clearly won FL
and the issue would never have gone to SCOTUS. If SCOTUS had never selected Bush, we wouldn't be in this mess. So, yes, Nader f*cked us all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Gore blames Clinton
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
20. You mean like tax increases on the wealthy? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Yeah,
Hold your breath for THAT one.
Please.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
22. Questions that must be asked about the Super Congress:
Will they have capes?

Will they wear their underpants on the outside of their tights?

Will they be able to leap tall buildings in a single bound?

I think the left better get busy and find some kryptonite.

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. +1
The Super Congress...
Fighting for
TRUTH,
Justice,
and the "Uniquely American Solution!"

LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
26. What's the hostage in this case? In the debt ceiling case, it was our full faith and credit.
In this case, it is a trigger that guts defense massively but doesn't touch entitlement benefits or programs for the poor. And nothing changes until 2013. So I don't think it will be nearly the hostage situation you claim. That doesn't mean they might not try to pass bad stuff; I just don't think this has as much to do with hostages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC