Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Obama and the Dems had promptly delivered what they promised in 2008

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 09:01 PM
Original message
If Obama and the Dems had promptly delivered what they promised in 2008
then none of this shit-opalooza would be happening. Democrats would have swept the 2010 elections, and the Republicans would have been an irrelevance at this point.

We were lied to by candidates, plain and simple.

18 years of triangulation and appeasement, and here we are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Pres. Obama protected SS and Medicare benefits from any cuts, contrary to your predictions.
Edited on Mon Aug-01-11 09:05 PM by ClarkUSA
Moving the rhetorical goalpost now? *WWMCDN?















* What Would Monica Crowley Do Now? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. One of us is seriously hallucinating
Edited on Mon Aug-01-11 09:05 PM by MannyGoldstein
I hope that it's you, because I have a family that depends on me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. WWMCDN?
Edited on Mon Aug-01-11 09:08 PM by ClarkUSA
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
40. You're not going to shut anyone up with that childish shit.
Any more than you'd shut them up by pulling out the oft-used race card. We're a little tired of that dead pony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #40
50. I has grown old and stale.
We would have to be brain dead if we didn't notice we were had. It won't be explained away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. In the 1.5 trillion cuts discussion, EVERYTHING, including Social Security and Medicare, is on the
table. Bernie Sanders just said it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Sanders, who "embraced" McConnell's proposal? He is either lying or misinformed.
Edited on Mon Aug-01-11 09:17 PM by ClarkUSA
Read this:

"3 Big Victories for Obama & Dems in Debt Ceiling Fight – Republicans Just Trying to Save Face"
http://tinyurl.com/obamadebtdealvictory


Lots of political analysts like Nate Silver and Eugene Robinson has come to the same conclusion. Senator Al Franken, who voted for the debt deal, also acknowledged this fact as one of the reasons he voted for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. No. That is bullshit.
Either you have made an error in perception, or you are posting blatantly disingenuous propaganda of the kind that is so common on Fox News.

I listened to the interview that you got your disinformation from three times.

Senator Sanders endorsed McConnell's proposal to "take the case to the American people".

He did not endorse McConnell's "deficit reduction plan".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #23
66. Yesterday we were hearing how much Barney Frank loved this plan
Another day a different spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
44. Surely everyone has seen how this has played out, but how it will continue to play out
cannot be predicted with any more than a 99.9999% certainty. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
71. I clicked on that link and the page was not found
much like those three supposedly big victories. Wait, was one of them $2.5 trillion in cuts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Middle finga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Too bad he put them on the table in the first place
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. It's called rope-a-dope. Republicans got nothing they wanted here in the end, thanks to Pres. Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #11
25. Oh, he roped some dopes, alright. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 04:39 PM
Original message
the only dopes he roped are the american people
question: would you be cheering this awful legislation if a
republican president pushed it? answer: NO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
49. the only dopes he roped are the american people
question: would you be cheering this awful legislation if a
republican president pushed it? answer: NO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
63. Really?
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/08/01/eveningnews/main20086598.shtml">Boehner: I got 98 percent of what I wanted.

"I do. When you look at this final agreement that we came to with the white House, I got 98 percent of what I wanted. I'm pretty happy."

What definition of "nothing" are you using when you say that the "Republicans got nothing they wanted here in the end?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. So looming fiscal disaster, plunging the world economy into catastrophic decline . . .
Will protect Medicare and Social Security? You *are* an optimist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Until 2013, there are no cuts. A future Democratic-controlled Congress can change policy.
Edited on Mon Aug-01-11 09:29 PM by ClarkUSA
President Obama pushed for that timeline for good reason.

All the more reason to make sure we take back the House and keep the Senate and WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 04:50 AM
Response to Reply #16
29. We need job creation through stimulus spending NOW. . .
Last year, actually. 2013 will be too late. We'll be 18 months into The Great Depression 2.0.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IamK Donating Member (514 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #29
77. Replace "Playoffs" with Stimulus and watch this video....
It ain't gonna happen anytime soon....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p3-eavMSBnk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prana69 Donating Member (204 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-11 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #16
80. Oh yeah, just like when the Democrats controlled Congress 2008-2010?
How'd that work out for us?

Are you claiming that Obama sold us up the river on a gamble that a future Democratic Congress will be able to repeal / reverse this deal (that you are actually claiming is so awesome)?

Gawd you are delusional.

You do know that the Repukes own the voting machines, the SCOTUS and the media? Do you really think they are going to let the Democrats win Congress again? That was a mistake. They misjudged the size of the swing to Obama, and got the switching figures wrong. That won't happen again.

I admire your tenacity. The depth of your denial is astonishing.

P69

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
INdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. No ..SS and Medicare is not protected.. All entitlements are on the table
and will be decided by this super congress in a couple months..Don't let them fool ya..Obama didn't protect anything for the middle class
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. That's a false statement. These are the facts --->
Edited on Mon Aug-01-11 09:32 PM by ClarkUSA
"3 Big Victories for Obama & Dems in Debt Ceiling Fight – Republicans Just Trying to Save Face"
http://tinyurl.com/obamadebtdealvictory


The WH fact sheet, NYT's Nate Silver, WaPo's Eugene Robinson, and Senator Al Franken (who voted for the debt deal) all know the facts. Why don't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
INdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Listen to what Bernie Sanders had to say.
it is not a false statement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. No thanks. Sanders, who "embraced" McConnell's proposal? He's either lying or misinformed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
INdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #22
30. McConnell's proposal??
Well whatever you say...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #19
32. What Obama said
That's why the second part of this agreement is so important. It establishes a bipartisan committee of Congress to report back by November with a proposal to further reduce the deficit, which will then be put before the entire Congress for an up or down vote. In this stage, everything will be on the table. To hold us all accountable for making these reforms, tough cuts that both parties would find objectionable would automatically go into effect if we don’t act.

Unless there is more than one meaning for the word "everything" :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. You mean, the same Obama that begged Republicans for $650 b in entitlement cuts?
A few days ago? When the Republicans weren't even asking for these cuts?

Why would you think he wants to cut entitlements today?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #32
61. And ain't it grand that we no longer have a Democracy -
We have a Czardom of Twelve.

I am guessing that our "troikas" will all have ponies!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #19
37. "Error 404 - Page not found"
Seems oddly appropriate.

I've already pointed out to you the glaring misinterpretation of the Fact Sheet at the heart of your analysis. I hope you admit your error when the Joint Committee issues its recommendations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #19
52. The link to the BLOG you're using as evidence is broken.
But then, so are the philosophical underpinnings of your argument, so I suppose it fits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #19
76. "Everyone chill the fuck out, I GOT THIS" is just a FUCKING INSULTING JOKE at this point
with all due respect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
56. Did you miss Conyers saying Obama offered up SS and
not the republicans? Conyers told him there would be protests outside the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #56
79. Google "Larry Summers" + February 2009 + reform
Edited on Tue Aug-02-11 09:57 PM by truedelphi
+ Social Security and you will see that this has been on Obama's plate for a long long time.

He merely had to wait until the Dems lost the House majority, so that the blame can fall on both parties.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
69. Everything's still on the table according to the President
http://www.advisorone.com/2011/08/02/obama-signs-debt-bill-vows-everything-on-table-for

But, Obama continued, the compromise measure requires a “next step” in which both sides of Congress must come up with a “larger plan to cut the deficit, which is important to the long-term health” of the nation’s economy. “Since you can’t close the deficit with just spending cuts, we’ll need a balanced approach, where everything is on the table,” he said.


Could mean anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. keep campaigning manny, rock on,lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Project much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. Agreed. It's almost as if they can't bear any position except "underdog." nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. Indies don't for dems like they did in 08 because
They were looking for right leaning solutions.

They had that in McCain.

They were looking serious left leaning solutions.
They went back to repukes or stayed home.

Dems, bless their hearts, can't fool indies.
Indies want a party of the left when they vote for them.

They got no Hope & little Change.

Nafta? Welfare to Work anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. You are right, Manny. Even with this vote, they were saying
that even a day delay would give room for constituents to assemble/rant.

Had the Dems pulled all triggers (single payer in 2009, debt ceiling Dec 2010, etc) we would not be in this circus today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #13
28. The Dems' worst mistakes can be boiled down to acting as if they believe
everything the Rs say about them.

We're too liberal?

Ok, we'll vote for a tax cut for billionaires,

We're aft on defense?

Ok, we'll expand that war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
14. And how do you propose the dems could have done that without having 60 dems in the Senate?
Without 60 votes in the Senate NOTHING is able to be done.
Have you missed all the GOP obstruction that has been going on ever since Obama was sworn in?

p.s. We've had 60 democratic senators in the Senate for ONLY 49 days.
Senator Franken was sworn in July 2009 and Senator Kennedy died August 2009.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #14
24. Are you saying that Bush got nothing done?
Or that Bush had 60 Republican Senators.

Help me out here, I'm a having some trouble understanding your analysis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. Bush got things done largely because of Dems who seemed positively eager
to cave for him.

I dont know how many times during the Bush years someone would complain about how their allegedly Democratic Congresscritter had voted for some stinking heap of Republican legislation, and would be met by apologists who said, " He had to vote for it because it was going to pass anyway. To vote against it would have been pointless grandstanding."

No wonder voters have trouble telling the difference between the Ds and the Rs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #14
31. Reconciliation bills and a lot better politics
The D's should have brought out the cots for every single Republican filibuster. Would have made a sufficient spectacle on the evening news to demonstrate the R's were the ones "not getting stuff done".

Instead, Congress as a whole was labeled as "not getting stuff done". And D's controlled congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
42. It would only have taken a simple majority to change the filibuster rule before
Congress was seated in 2009.

Missed opportunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #14
46. They could have changed the fillibuster rules as they organized the Senate.
Why didn't they do that? Did they really believe that
Lieberman and a handful of other not-real-Democrats
were going to go along with enacting DEMOCRATIC
policy?

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
72. Dems need 60 votes but the tiny tea party only needs less than one half of the house
Can you not see why people are venting frustration?














Don't worry most will still vote dem, because republicans are worse.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
INdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
15. Brace yourselef..Cause it is going to get a hell-of-a-lot worse in
2012..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
18. Oh, your just a truth teller Manny!! k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
20. If only I shit gold, I'd be a millionaire.
Life doesn't work that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrScorpio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
26. There are people who wouldn't have cared IF everything was promptly delivered
Obama wasn't their guy, he played around with too many bigots, he was never lefty enough, he's too emotionally controlled, and so on and so on.

There are plenty enough people who will always have plenty of reasons to diss Obama and the Democrats… And I'm not talking about right wingers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #26
43. Obama extended the wars, the only jobs he created are on Wall Street
and he's protected tax cuts for the wealthy, the opposite of what he said he'd do. His policies have hurt the majority so it's no surprise that "plenty enough" people have reasons to diss him and the Democrats. That's how we lost 2010.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrScorpio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. And where were the Republicans when all this happened?
Why aren't people holding THEM accountable for holding the nation hostage?

Why is it easier to blame the Black guy, who's the ONLY one in the room with them. instead of going after all the motherfuckers who caused this mess to begin with?

I'm sorry, unless we have the guts to fundamentally change the way our economic system functions in this country, we are ALL subject to the whims of Wall Street. It's never going to happen unless we have a fall back plan. Who's plan, I have to ask.

The Wars suck… But it's always been easier to get into them than out of them… And do you know why? I'll tell you… Because they make MONEY. That's the system that Obama inherited. If you think that any President can just pull out of one quickly and unilaterally, you're dreaming. It'll never happen. Especially, without massively popular opposition against them… Have you seen any of that? I haven't. Most people aren't even aware that we're even AT war.

So, now that things never turned out every single way we wanted them to, it's easier to whine and complain instead of getting up off our duffs and doing something about. Easier to just blame the Black Guy, no matter what he does. It's too hard to take on our real enemies, the fucking Republicans.

We lost because we chose to lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Where were they? Not responsible for Obama's committments

or for his lack of leadership, that's where.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #45
62. We went after them
We tossed them out on their ears. 2006, 2008. We elected President Obama and big majorities of Democrats all around. Then they pissed it away. Which means that Barack Obama, the President, the position with the "buck stops here" placeholder, pissed it away.

If the previous guy fucks shit up, and you dump him and bring on a new guy with the understanding he will fix it, but he does not fix it, what do you do then?

Do you blame a wasp for stinging you? How do you blame a republican for being a republican? But if I bring in an exterminator, and all he does is poke around in their nest with a stick a bit, and I get stung, I'm probably gonna be pissed at the exterminator.

We lost because the grass roots had no support from those we elected. The roots need leaves to gather sunlight and turn it into sugar to fuel the plant through the hard times.

In short, no more excuses. When you take on high office, you either deliver results or you do not. And then you should be judged on those results. No matter if you are Black or White or both, male or female, or any permutation of humanity. Results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
34. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
35. In retrospect, it seems obvious that he never intended to keep any of those promises
He played us.

We fell for it.

And personal loyalty has kept many from figuring out how badly we've been betrayed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. +1000
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
36. What did they promise in 2008?
You know, actually, rather than in the fantasies of many of their supporters?

A key element of the Obama coalition was rhetoric designed to appeal simultaneously to liberals and centrists by appearing to promise both what they wanted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
39. When I objected to his nomination,
I was lectured about how he was the "not dlc" choice.

When I objected to his appointments, I was told "He/they haven't even done anything yet. Give them a chance!"

When I objected to the direction his administration took during the first 90 days, the first 6 months, the first year, I was told, "He hasn't had enough time! Give him more time!!!!!"

Well, I think he's had plenty of time, and I think he's used it to destroy the party and the nation.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
41. All of this "coulda, woulda, shoulda" crap is useless. We are where we are. Now we must do something
about it.

Pure and simple.

Sorry to throw a wet blanket on this thread, but you should know better than to try and relive the past, Manny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #41
48. It wouldn't be useless if we were to learn from this history.
Think we will?

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #41
51. I think the "Democrats had their hands tied" crowd needs
To be reminded of how we got here. We had a mandate, and flushed it down the toilet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #51
73. I think people like you should look at what he was contending with.
His plate was overloaded with the crap left to him by the previous resident; he's one man and that wouldn't be king or a god. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #41
55. Exactly. Doesn't matter whose fault, who did what or didn't, etc. We have a mess-- need to fix it.
Edited on Tue Aug-02-11 06:48 PM by Hoyt

I don't even care if they have to discuss my SS or Medicare as part of the solution(s) -- just do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
53. CORRECT
Obama has fucking SQUANDERED EVERYTHING
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
54. sounds so simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #54
59. I know - what was he THINKING?
All this brain power gone to waste - all he had to do was ask :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #54
68. Nogt simple -- But a lot more straightforward than its been made out to be
Attention to a few basic principles -- and actually fighting for them -- would have helped a lot.

All of this triangulation, concessions, mixed messages, etc. sure hasn't done it, so there's no reason not to try a more straightforward fight against the lies and destructiveness of GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
57. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
58. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Agony Donating Member (865 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
60. I HATE it that you are right.
but thanks for saying it... maybe if we throw the truth around enough some of it will stick

Cheerio!
Agony
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissDeeds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
64. You're right, Manny
Edited on Tue Aug-02-11 07:48 PM by MissDeeds
Some here would like to blame the voters for the debacle, never mind that those we elected let the voters down. It makes much more sense to blame those who went door to door, donated money they didn't have to spare, manned phone lines, drove people to the polls and believed in the change we were promised. Yes, the voters let the politicians down. Shame on us.

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
65. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Veracious Donating Member (196 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
67. SHOULD HAVE PROSECUTED the BUSH ADMIN.
This was the biggest mistake ever. The Republiklan would have been on the run for years. I'm sick of reacting to these Teatards. We need to be proactive!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharksBreath Donating Member (381 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #67
75. Exactly. Everyday on your TV for the next 4 years.
Everyday the American public being reminded of what the Republicans did to this country.

How quickly they have forgot.

That's what happens when you look forward instead of backward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
70. 56 days
with a filibuster proof majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swilton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
74. and they expect scare us to voting for them in 2012
because the tea-baggers might get in:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RowdyRacer Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #74
78. When Obama Plays Basketball...
does he shoot the ball in the other teams goal???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC