Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

minor engineering math problem

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 11:06 AM
Original message
minor engineering math problem
how many gallons in one mile of 1.25 inch pvc schedule 40 pipe? (Main problem: I don't know if 1.25 pvc is ID or OD, secondary problem is just the math - please show your work :P )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. pass
I musta-been-absent-that-day, teacher:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. Try this site for the info you need:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. don't need flow rates or velocities (YIKES!)
just want volume
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. I noticed that after I posted, but if you look over to the right, there's
a bunch of links including this one:

http://flexpvc.com/PVCPipeSize.shtml

Have fun!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. 1 1/4" sch40 pvc pipe has an id of 1.360"
Edited on Thu Jul-28-11 11:19 AM by lumberjack_jeff
http://www.harvel.com/pipepvc-sch40-80-dim.asp

Pipe sizing is an odd thing. Originally, 2" standard wall pipe was 2" ID with a 3/16" wall thickness or 2.375" OD. Fittings were made to accommodate this OD. Steam boilers were designed to high pressures, so there was a need for stronger pipe, so they invented the system of schedules. "Standard wall" was incorporated as "Sch 40", Extra heavy was renamed "Sch 80" etc. But because all the fittings depended on a standardized outside diameter, nominal pipe sizes really have no relationship to any actual dimensional parameter.

1 1/4" pipe is 1.660 OD
1 1/2" pipe is 1.900 OD
2" pipe is 2.375 OD

The inside diameters vary depending on the schedule.

edited to look at the correct row.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cloudbase Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. And from there it's just
pi*r^2*h, where h is one mile. Convert to cubic inches and divide by the number of cubic inches per gallon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EOTE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. I can tell you that the 1.25" is almost definitely the outer diameter.
So you'd probably need to find out the ID or the thickness of the PVC to find out the answer to this problem. The area of a circle is pi*r*r, so if the internal diameter is 1", the area of the circle would be 3.14*.5*.5. Then you'd just need to multiply the area by the amount of inches in a mile to find out the volume in cubic inches. Then divide by the number of cubic inches in a gallon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EOTE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. And btw, there are 231.8 cubic inches in a gallon. FYI NT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
25. I didn't have a piece of it handy -
the scraps went off with the truck
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
33. OD = 1.660 n/t
Edited on Thu Jul-28-11 11:58 AM by lumberjack_jeff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. 1.25 is inside diameter.
Edited on Thu Jul-28-11 11:17 AM by RC
Take a one foot section of 1.25 pvc.
Cap one end.
Fill with water.
Pour into measuring cup.
Take amount times 5280.
That is your answer.

1-1/4" 1.660 (~1-5/8", 42.164mm) 1.380 .140 370 180 80/250

http://flexpvc.com/PVCPipeSize.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
26. no, apparently that would be too logical
to have something actually measure out to what the freaking name of the thing is

more crap designed by men, I am sure - like automotive parts where every freaking bolt needs a different damn tool }(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
6. Figure out how many gallons are in one foot of that pipe,
Then multiply by 5,280(number of feet in a mile).

The formula would be V=πr2h where V is volume, r=radius and h is height. That is radius squared by the way. Once you have the figure for V multiply it by 5,280 feet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
8. ...
Edited on Thu Jul-28-11 11:33 AM by FreakinDJ
3.14 x (1.360"/2)2 x (5280' x 12")

x 0.0043 = gallons

4.55 x 63360 x .0043 = 1242.11 US gal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #8
24. now you seem too high
I got something much closer to ptah's - around 400 gallons

but I am starting to glaze over now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. my area of a circle is off
Edited on Thu Jul-28-11 11:49 AM by FreakinDJ
(Pi x R)squared is wrong

pi x R-squared





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ptah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
11. 400.8 gallons/ mile
Edited on Thu Jul-28-11 11:23 AM by Ptah
McMaster-Carr says ID of 1-1/4 pipe is 1.364"

http://www.mcmaster.com/#pvc-%28schedule-40%29-pipe/=ddh3f2
The area of a circle with a dia of 1.364 is 1.461 sq. inches.
There are 63360 inches in one mile.
The volume (in cubic inches) is 92583.54.

There are 231 cu. in. in a gallon.


92583.54/231 = 400.8
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. HA! thankyou!
I DID know the formula for volume of a cylinder, sheesh people!

and my guestimate of 5.3 plus or minus miles was 2000 gallons - not too bad eh?

(new pump is running 285 lbs pressure if you want to be impressed - we finally got a pressure gauge on it so we can better guess where a break in the line is:P )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. Five miles of 1 1/4" pipe? With 300' of static head?
Edited on Thu Jul-28-11 11:37 AM by lumberjack_jeff
Yikes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. 129.8 psi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #23
31. My calculator indicates that she should see about 100 psi at the house at 3gpm.
Surprising. I would think pressure drop would be greater.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. I don't know what the pressure is up here but
we think we are getting a little over 6 gpm (took just under 9 seconds on my cell phone stop watch to fill a gallon pickle jar)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. Oh please lets not go to flow calcs
I would have to break out my laptop and use the EA

I wrote a little Work Book for Instrument Techs a while back

Fluid Properties

Temperature
Pressure
Density and Fluid Expansion
Type of Flow
Inside Pipe Diameter
Viscosity
Reynolds Number and Velocity Profile
Hydraulic Phenomena

Pressure = ratio of Force over Area (P=F/A)
Density = ratio of Mass over Volume (p=m/V)
Specific Gravity = ratio of operating density to water (SG = P liquid / P water)

Fluid Expansion is -
V = Vo (1+B x (Delta Temp))
V = New Volume
Vo = Old Volume
B = Cubic coefficient of expansion
Delta Temp = temperature change

Boyle’s Law – The Volume of an Ideal Gas at constant Temperature varies inversely with Absolute Pressure V = K/P

Charle’s Law – The Volume of an Ideal Gas at constant Pressure varies directly with Absolute Temperature V = K x T

Ideal Gas Law – the combination Boyle’s and Charle’s Law
PV = n R T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #19
34. that's only half way
it ultimatly goes a hair under 6 miles with 600 feet!

yeah


here is the baby that does it:





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #34
41. Impressive. Seriously.
Where's the pump suction? Directly underneath?

If you ever want to know the exact elevation difference between the house and the pump, with the pump off, record the PSI at the house and subtract that from the reading of the gauge in the photo. Multiply the result by 2.307 to get the elevation difference in feet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. this has been the problem this week
there is a standard 1.5 hp submersible in the well. The old green pump used to take water from both the well discharge and a storage tank above ground at the same time (a safety gimmick to prevent it running completely dry.) For some reason we can't quite figure out, (probably a slight change in the plumbing configuration) it won't work running both pumps at the same time, so this one is just getting water basically by gravity from a 6000 gallon storage that sits a few feet above it.

We originally had another submersible IN the storage tank but we burnt up three or four (under warranty) before somebody figured out the pressure fluctuations from the different places we were wanting to pump to, plus the too-frequent pipe breaks down low were causing the problem. And old well man set us up with the myers pump. It worked for 15+ years and will probably be rebuilt so we have second or a spare. If we had known the problems we were going to have with this new one the last week or so, we probably just would have went for the rebuild alone. As it was, the first one died before we had any rain and that well was the sole source of livestock water for an unknown time (turned out to be just a couple of days, but one can never know) So we were in a situation where a replacement was supposed to be the fastest solution. Ha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #43
55. Let me see if I understand.
The submersible (centrifugal) pump discharge has a tee in it. One leg goes to the 6000 gal storage, the other to the suction of the myers (positive displacement) pump.

Wouldn't the submersible pump run all the time? If nothing else, depending on the flow capacity of the myers pump, it could draw water through the centrifugal pump causing it to spin and destroying it quickly. Series pump installations are problematic. Series pump installations of different type pumps (centrifugal vs positive displacement) are almost impossible.

In a previous life, I spent 15 years designing pumps. I would divert the output of the centrifugal pump exclusively to the storage tank and equip it with a level switch to turn off the well pump when the tank is full (Depending on how tall the tank is, you might be able to do this with a pressure switch). I would set up the Myers to gravity feed exclusively from the tank. (It sounds as if this is how it's configured now) I would equip it with a pressure switch to shut off at about 280 psi and on at about 260. I would also put a large bladder tank near the house, or at some elevation high enough that it can handle the local pressure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #55
61. yes to the tee
Edited on Thu Jul-28-11 01:49 PM by Kali
yes the submersible would run "all the time" (manually turned on and off at the power box)

previously (from 15 years up until 10 days ago) it WAS in a series and it worked fine

additional ranch-rigged engineering for your amusement - the tee that goes to the storage goes up to top and then down inside to bottom as we never cut another opening down low - so discharge from that tank is with siphon (there is another tee and a valve off of that to fill a drinker (that had a float valve on it) but we hardly ever use it so the valve is shut and normally buried under 2 feet of sand (because the guy that originally started this project was working on the cheap too)

we are planning to add some timers and a float switch after we get a handle on the bill for this latest work (translation: been planning that for years and likely it still won't happen)

prior to the early 90's when this got started, the whole place survived off of stock ponds and 2 6-foot x 25-feet deep, concrete-cased, hand-dug wells (one, really) that used an old greasy pump jack run with an electric motor (REAL leather leathers in that cylinder LOL)

we would love to put in another shallow dug well but nobody seems willing or has a clue how to do it anymore and I sure as hell don't like handling shovels:scared: although I used to be the one that had climb down to fish out the drowned snakes and squirrels that occasionally found their way in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #61
76. No problem with a siphon, provided the pump is below the water level.
Edited on Thu Jul-28-11 02:30 PM by lumberjack_jeff
... and the pump can lift the water over the high point in the suction line and/or a foot valve is installed in the tank.

Assuming the pipe from the well to the tank and the suction from the tank to the Myers are separate pipes, and if you're okay with ranch/lumberjack engineering, consider a toilet bowl float valve in the tank to shut off the flow from the submersible pump. Install a normal pressure switch to shut off the submersible motor. Water level rises, float valve closes, pressure switch opens, pump shuts off.

Myers pump turns on, water level drops, valve opens, pressure at the submersible drops, switch closes, submersible pump turns on. Lather, rinse, repeat. Better than timers.

Do not climb into any pit where methane or hydrogen sulfide may be present. A hand dug well is an enclosed space.

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00001448.htm

I'm very familiar with the Michigan case. It was extremely tragic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #76
83. oh no - it is the same pipe
but we are planning to cut a lower hole for the myers pump as soon as we get caught up on the storages uphill and can leave that storage empty for a couple of days. (of course the dream was to use this system to run DOWNHILL by gravity from the streambed or the shallow wells up here. Yeah so then we went into a 20 year drought)

ooh good point about the hydrogen sulfide (forgot the abbreviation) the "upper" shallow well does get that nasty sulfer bacteria stench and coats things with black slime (and that is why it was only ever used for livestock) as do a couple of places that can get springy in wet years.

The old "lower" well that we used all my life was good water. Up pressure tanks for domestic use? heh, then we would have to replumb the house because I doubt the pipes could handle it. we have an old masonry tank with a roof and more or less screened off eaves that feeds the house by gravity.

I use a hose to fill the washer and a bucket for the dishwasher. I do NOT appreciate pressure-reducing automatic valves on appliances.:P

Someday we will modernize, but then the world may be out of electricity and we would be retro cool with our low tech gravity and solar composting drainages;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #14
22. The ranching stuff you do is interesting to me.
I wish I was closer to you. I'd visit and fix your old trucks for fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #22
29. OMG, I would adopt you then!
we just beat the hell out of the dodge on this last pump "incident"

having to drive 3 or 4 miles just to go see if the water was making it half way, (then of course driving back when it wasn't) on these roads was painful

back and forth and back and forth and back and forth...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
12. 228 gallons
Edited on Thu Jul-28-11 11:35 AM by wtmusic
3.14159 (pi) x r2 (.2647) x 5280 x 12 = 52668 in3 = about 228 gallons

(with 1.029" id)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crabby Appleton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Your value for pi is incorrect. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. D'oh!
Thanks for correction. :blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. that doesn't seem right
at between 6 and 7 gallons a minute it is taking 2 hours to go 3 miles (with a 300 foot climb, but that it too complicated for me) so I was guessing like 300 or so
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. 400 gallons
(3.1416(pi) * r2 (.4624))= 1.453 in^2 area

5280*12 = 63,360 inches per mile

92,000 cubic inches of water.

= about 400 gallons.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. I got 1200 gal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. That's correct
I was using earlier poster's i.d. of 1.029.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #21
28. That was me. Sorry.
:blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
30. This is a microcosm of the political world!
Everybody seems to "know" something different, and yet everybody is completely sure of what they think they know. No two versions of "reality" agree.

If no two Democrats can agree about the diameter of a 1-1/4 inch pipe, then it's no wonder no two politicians can agree about ANYTHING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. There's only one right answer, and you can measure it with a ruler. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #32
82. You'd certainly think so. But we still get half-a-dozen different claimed answers.
And that's my point. If we can't get consensus on something that has one, clear-cut, easy to verify answer, it's no wonder we never get consensus on other issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. !!!
Edited on Thu Jul-28-11 12:11 PM by Kali
:rofl: :thumbsup:


seriously though, if you are inclusive of multiple viewpoints, give the conversation a little time and not jump to the first/easiest answers, a good approximation of reality emerges...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TlalocW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
37. I don't quite understand this but here:
According to this site:
http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/ansi-steel-pipes-d_305.html

A 1.25 inch pipe has an internal diameter of 1.38 inches so I assume it's something how 2 by 4's aren't actually 2 by 4s.

So the calculation would be

Pi * (1.38 in / 2)^2 * ( 5280 ft * 12 in / 1 ft ) * ( 1 gal / 231 in^3 )

TlalocW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. at around 11 or 12 years of age I experienced my first great disillusionment of the world
when I worked for HOURS on the plans for something I was going to build with 1 inch lumber and then the reality of the ACTUAL dimensions RUINED EVERYTHING
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TlalocW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. In grad school
I got disillusioned with my department (applied mathematics - turned out the university didn't really have that program) and switched to electrical engineering (have an undergrad in physics). I took some undergrad classes to catch up, and for homework in one of them, the problem resulted in an impossible integral. I couldn't believe that homework at that level would do that, and I didn't think undergrad engineering students would know about numerical integration methods like Picard's, etc. so I went to ask the TA about it. She looked at the problem and said, "Make that variable 1." I looked at it, and it turned it into a simple integral so I asked her, "Why do we make that variable 1?" She replied, "We just do."

I quit grad school soon after and became a computer programmer. :)

TlalocW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #37
45. The ID is Bigger Than The OD?
That can't be right. I think it might be the other way around. That would make the wall thickness 0.065", or a little over 1/16th inch. That seems about right just thinking about how a piece of plastic pipe looks.
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ptah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #45
51. PVC (Schedule 40) dimensions:
Inside Diameter 1.364"
Outside Diameter 1.66"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #51
59. Wow!
That's odd. That isn't even close to 1.25#. Probably the other schedules are the same ID. Just the OD changes. I don't even know if they make PVC in schedule 80. I know it's common in stainless steel.
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #59
62. yes they make schedule 80 pipe
but good luck finding fittings - they all seem to be 40
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
42. 398.447299
Edited on Thu Jul-28-11 12:57 PM by pokerfan
First I googled the spec for the I.D.: For 1-1/4" pipe, average I.D. is 1.360 in. (http://www.harvel.com/tech-specs-pvc-pipe-40.asp)

Then some google math because I is lazy engineer:



You have to double check the syntax to make sure it understood you correctly but it's pretty awesome. We could have avoided the Mars Climate Orbiter disaster in 1999 had NASA had this technology. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. and I do appreciate the 6-decimal point figure
Edited on Thu Jul-28-11 01:14 PM by Kali
:rofl:

we used to have a Soil Conservationist (now Natural Resources Conservation Service) who obviously had a good engineering background.

We would get these plans for stuff with figures to 4 decimal points. Then we would go sink a railroad tie to however deep we could dig and tie it up with baling wire.

or like when we originally did this pipeline project - specs were anytime pipe was above ground it had to be steel - so one place where we went through a culvert under a road we dutifully used steel. That place is the FIRST one we look when there is a break in the line, because the steel to pvc joint breaks so often.

If it had been all plastic it probably would have got a little sunburnt for a couple feet but would still be holding...:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #46
57. Yeah, I threw that in for the giggles
But that answer is correct assuming the average I.D. specification is correct.

Area of the cross-section: pi * r^2 = Pi * (1.36/2)^2 = 1.45 in^2
Length in inches: 5280 ft * 12 in/ft = 63360 in.
Volume = Area * Length = 1.45 in^2 * 63360 in. = 91872 in^3
1 US gallon = 231 cubic inches
91872 / 231 = 398 gallons

And all this reminds me of my favorite engineering joke:

A mathematician, a physicist and an engineer were all given a red rubber ball and told to find the volume.

The mathematician carefully measured the diameter and evaluated a triple integral.

The physicist filled a beaker with water, put the ball in the water, and measured the total displacement.

The engineer looked up the model number in his Red-Rubber-Ball table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TlalocW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #57
69. At my undergrad, the math professors used to say this
Sociologists think they're psychologists
Psychologists think they're biologists
Biologists think they're chemists
Chemists think they're physicists
Physicists think they're mathematicians
Mathematicians think they're gods (they're right)

TlalocW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #69
72. xkcd 435
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #42
47. but it still fails 48÷2(9+3)
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #47
54. Yeah
Frustrating that it chokes on something so straightforward. Like I said, you really have to double-check. But it's handy for unit conversions:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. that's awesome, I need to use that more often. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
44. Assuming ID
5280 feet in a mile. Diameter is 1.25/12 feet, so radius is 1.25/24. (1.25/24)^2 times pi * 5280 gives cubic feet.

7.5 gallons in a cubic foot.

Sorry, i don't give answers. Only instructions on how to get the answers.
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ptah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. ?
1.25/24 = .052

.052^2 = .0027

.0027*pi = .0085

.0085 * 5280 = 44.99

44.499 / 7.5 = 5.99 Gallons

:wtf:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. Um! I Said 7.5 Gallons In A Cubic Foot
If you have cubic feet you MULTIPLY the cubic feet by 7.5. You divided it. That makes your result off by a factor of the square of 7.5.
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ptah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #49
52. My mistake.
44.499 * 7.5 = 333.7


:blush:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EOTE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. You divided when you should have multiplied.
7.5 gallons in a cubic foot. If there are 44.5 cubic feet, you need to multiply that by 7.5 to get the total number of gallons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ptah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. oops

44.499 * 7.5 = 333.7

:blush:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #53
60. This is what crashes Mars probes!
Edited on Thu Jul-28-11 01:45 PM by pokerfan

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #60
63. And Makes The Hubble Blurry
Another "oops".
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #53
66. wait! wut?
Edited on Thu Jul-28-11 01:56 PM by Kali
so my original guess of 300 was even closer than I thought? hahahahhahahahhaha:woohoo:

oh wait again - that was for if the ID was actually 1.25?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #66
71. Yeah
Somebody posted the actual ID. It was a lot bigger than 1.2". So, the number would be higher than my solution would provide. Same math, just a different ID.
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HappyMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
58. What time does the train leave New York?
:silly:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #58
64. xkcd 356
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #64
77. LOL! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #58
65. Stardate 11522.7
Now, are you happy you're so funny?!?!?
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HappyMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #65
67. I wasn't making fun of anyone or anything!
I admire people that can do super complex mathematical equations.


I apologize if anyone was offended, and will take my misguided humor elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #67
70. I Was Only Kdding Back
No, i'm sorry if i came off wrong. I actually thought your post was funny.
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #67
74. Here's a fun one
Burt works in the city and lives in the suburbs with Ernie. Every afternoon, Burt gets on a train which arrives at the suburban station at exactly 5pm. Ernie leaves the house and drives so as to arrive at the station at exactly 5pm to pick up Burt. The route that Ernie drives never changes and his driving speed is constant.

One day Burt gets to leave early and catches an earlier train arriving at the suburban station at 4pm instead of 5. Instead of calling Ernie to ask for an earlier pick-up, Burt decides to get some exercise and begins walking home along the route that Ernie drives knowing that eventually he will meet Ernie and they will ride home together in the car.

This is what happens and Burt ends up arriving at home ten minutes earlier than normal. Assuming that Burt's walking speed is constant and no time is lost on the pick-up, for how many minutes does Burt walk?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
68. It depends upon whether it's schedule 40 or schedule 80
Edited on Thu Jul-28-11 02:02 PM by Gregorian
http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/pvc-cpvc-pipes-dimensions-d_795.html

Otherwise, I'm sure the process of calculating volume has been done in the replies above. Very basic stuff. 8th grade math.


Whoops, lumberjack jeff already mentioned this. Bravo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Permanut Donating Member (477 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
73. Okay, or you can do it the easy way
and just pray for the answer. I got 7.2, but I'm not sure if that's in hins or logs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
75. I Was Told That There Wouldn't Be Any Math on DU
I would like a refund.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #75
78. LOL
OK, President Ford...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
79. Do you mean PVC or Poly pipe? Did you buy it on a rolll?
Edited on Thu Jul-28-11 03:00 PM by lumberjack_jeff
Given the pressures you're using, I suspect you did mean PVC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #79
81. yes PVC
and of COURSE, I wasn't involved in gluing the god knows how many joints in the lower half of this (yes I know, 3 miles divided by 20 feet) so for many of the past ten years we have been replacing EVERY SINGLE JOINT in the lower, higher pressure 2 miles or so. Because if there is one thing I know how to do it is glue pipe! (I did the upper 2.5 miles before we did switch over to poly for a run over solid rock above ground)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
80. Tag this with "Threads you won't see on FR".
LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC