Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama is Going To Destroy SS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 11:52 AM
Original message
Obama is Going To Destroy SS
Is that what some of you think?

That Obama's plan is to kill SS?

Sorry, I just don't see it.
What I do see is: He is working the edges so that he gets easily re-elected.
That he hears the violent right-wingers and instead of punching them in the mouth he is allowing them to get close enough he can dish out their just deserts in a gentleman's fashion.

Talked to a pubbie relative today and he said he is disgusted with his party.

Obama is leading them to their own grave. I think it is marvelous politicking.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
adhd_what_huh Donating Member (368 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. yup..yup...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. Bush couldn't do it...
...with both Houses, a Democratic minority demonstrably to the right of the present one, and the unified support of the business sector, and an as-yet-unparalleled propaganda machine.

But Obama will succeed!

That's how powerful, and fiendish, he is!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Undermining the President isn't progressive.
Why would you call him fiendish?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Because I read DU religiously.
I have to ignore the evidence of my own eyes, and common sense, to reach that conclusion, but after 10 1/2 years here, that's not that hard to do any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #12
30. lol. Just when you thought, no way I'll need the sarcasm smiley for this one.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Well, yes.
A certain percentage of the Dems will back him simply because he is a Dem, even if he put up the exact same proposal that Bush did in 05.

But he is not going for outright privatization like Bush did - what he's doing simply undermines it so as to make it unsustainable. He already started it with the so-called 'tax holiday', decreasing the amount going into SS, promising to make that up out of general revenues while, at the same time, calling for a 4 trillion dollar reduction in spending - how, pray, is he going to pull THAT off? But Dems CHEER him on.

Just like only Nixon could go to China, only a Democrat can kill SS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. Killing the work of FDR and LBJ is "brilliant"
Someone's been spiking your Kool-Aid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Killing?
That, my friend, is hyperbolic.

Everyone knows SS has been deeply hurt and is in need of a health care plan.
Obama is not, no matter what anyone says, setting up death panels.

But in the meantime, the pubbies are being seen for their wanting death panels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. Obama saved the GOP
in 2008 it was abundantly clear that conservative ideas had failed. Now "both sides" are talking like supply-siders, extending tax cuts and saying they're going to create jobs, and talking about cutting trillions and saying that's going to "free the economy". The GOP has no opposition anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KeepItReal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. His landslide and Dem wins across the board should have ended the GOP
His clueless (being generous there) economic team and this corporate media kept propping up those losers until we got the last congressional election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ship of Fools Donating Member (899 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. This is what I've always believed.
Always. HOWEVER ... I find myself vacillating constantly about the man -- his chess game is a dangerous one. I think he does believe in some reforms, and I think with the right people in Congress, they could be intelligent reforms, not political ones. He's either going to convince me to vote for him in 2012, or I will NOT be voting Republican, if you know what I mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtown1123 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
7. He won't destroy it, but he could severely weaken it more so than any other Pres.
if he continues this nonsense that it isn't a "primary" driver of our deficit I won't "slash" benefits double speak nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. After all, he IS an incrementalist
Edited on Tue Jul-26-11 12:04 PM by kenny blankenship
It would be completely foreign to him to propose outright destruction of Social Security. But he is happy to falsely link Social Security to deficit negotiations and the national debt, and that sets up the next wave of attacks against it.

He's an incrementalist, and I think his record (Health Care Reform Swindle, putting Safety Net programs on the table) is very clear about which direction he is incrementing in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JAnthony Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. Letting Republicans in the House walk the plank....right out of office
Edited on Tue Jul-26-11 12:02 PM by JAnthony
next year.

Divine plan! We need a heavy (2/3rds) Democratic Party majority in House and Senate in 2013, reverse ALL this Bush tax cut business, start a public employment plan like the WPA, regulate financial industry, fulfill a more streamlined single-payer-like health care system.

Republicans will be choking and sputtering in a small minority in House and Senate. Fox News will be losing sponsorship, as the Murdoch/Ailes empire is collapsing, amidst charges of collusion, non-reported in-kind campaign contributions to the Republican Party, etc etc.

This is my dream, if ONLY we can make it to 2013 without a worldwide economic collapse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Yeah, like they did last year
wow, the denial is neck deep today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Denial?
Tell me what you know about the voting machines.

Do you deny they could have stolen many votes in that election?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. So how is giving them SS and Medicare going to solve this again?
That was your original fantasy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. So, you are in denial?
Your slap shit spewing does not influence me.

If all you have are one liners and are in denial about the voting machines, you got nothing. Pfft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JAnthony Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. Voters that put this Republican Tea bag slime in office just wanted
jobs and a turn-around in the recession!

They are learning that the Republicans in the House and Senate are only about Defense of corporations's untaxed profits and tax subsidies and about protecting the super rich.

Republicans in the House have done NOT ONE THING about jobs, and have passed ZERO bills into law in 7 months.


Not all voters are stupid.

We have another 15 months to wake up SOME voters who put these teabaggers in the House, and get them out of there.

It won't be easy, but it must be done... and yes, I am dreaming, and hoping it comes to pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. It's coming
No guarantee of success, but people are realizing the pubbies are total liars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kennah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. Obama is going to have to choose between being Hoover and being FDR
If he's practicing the policies of FDR, I'm good with voting for him in 2012.

If he's practicing the policies of Hoover, I'm not at all good with voting for him in 2012, but I fear we won't then get FDR (from the GOP, HA!) in 2012--instead we'll get Hitler.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
15. he's politicking a very dangerous game that DOES threaten SS and Medicare....
Edited on Tue Jul-26-11 12:07 PM by mike_c
If it's brilliant politicking, it's the political equivalent of playing with matches in a straw house-- and I doubt his ability to control the results. Sure, the republicans are looking like a bunch of petulant children, but the dems aren't coming off much better!

Look, there are pretty straightforward causes for our fiscal problems, but SS is not one of them. Not even remotely. Obama is not proposing solutions for THOSE problems. Instead, he's using discretionary spending and the social safety net as a smoke screen to HIDE the real problems and their straightforward solutions. If Obama was actually serious about reducing the national debt he would focus his efforts where they might be highly productive, or at least propose high yield solutions (like ending the wars sooner rather than later, shrinking the hideously costly U.S. empire a bit, or taxing the rich).

One might argue that republicans will block meaningful reforms, but that doesn't explain why Obama is going after SS and Medicare in response, since neither is really the problem. That's like saying that "well, my leg is broken but I'll order surgery on my head because that's what's in fashion these days." It's misdirection at best, delusion or an ulterior motive at worst.

Brilliant politicking? That's not what I want from national leadership. I want pragmatic and real solutions to the nation's problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Me too, Mike
I too, want pragmatic and real solutions.

So did Jimmy Carter, and look where that got him. And here we are.

The reality is that most of America is messed up. And any leader has to, if he wants to stay in power, has to mix it up and play along.

Besides no one gets to play Emperor without wanting to be an Emperor.

I just don't see where he is set out to KILL SS. Tweak it? Sure. Kill it? No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cottonseed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
17. If you're goal is to see a 3rd party candidate split the Democratic vote.
Then that is what you would want people to believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Nach Bachmann, Uns! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reformist2 Donating Member (998 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
21. I can't answer that until I know what long-term damage a default will do.
Edited on Tue Jul-26-11 12:22 PM by reformist2
I worry that a post-default landscape may ruin our credit and throw us into a financial spiral where we are forced to downsize, a la Greece.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Granted that could be the plan
But is pretty deep into conspiracy theory.

Are there republicans who work everyday to accomplish the destruction of the US? Yes.

And what Obama is doing is exposing those America haters. That's what I see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reformist2 Donating Member (998 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. I agree with you about Obama. I just don't know how far he should go...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrDiaz Donating Member (365 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
24. If i recall correctly
The same type of things were being said when the Health Care Bill was being "fought" for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
27. I'm still trying to sort out Republican motivations.
At first I thought that because nearly a trillion dollars' worth of debt is owned by wealthy Americans, they would never allow their pet political party to pee on the rug.

But then I started thinking about Social Security, and how several trillion dollars has already been diverted from it, distributed, and spent. The federal government owes Social Security many times what it owes American debt-holders... but what if the debt-holders also currently control all that former Social Security money somehow? Couldn't they benefit from a default by pinching off all that cash and keeping it? Wasn't that the primary objective of the Bush Administration after they stole Ohio? Is this whole thing just another elaborate heist?

I don't know. Finances are a mystery to me, as someone will point out soon enough, I am sure.

But the basic motivations are easy to foretell, because they never change: whatever their exact nature, they are greedy, self-serving, malevolent, and criminal.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. There is a lot of money on the table
And they have pinched a good bit of it already.

Every month about 50 billion dollars gets taken from the workers' paychecks.

That's $50 billion of floating dollars, each and every month, so that is a great temptation.

And while I get the fear that our money is in danger, I just don't see Obama as the one who is eyeing our money with greedy fingers. I do see the republicans drooling, tho.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
31. Washington politicians destroyed Social Security and Medicare.
They've been doing it for decades, and we're all pissed because now something has to be done to fix it. Both parties have gotten away with pretending that there is no problem, and no changes need to be made, and they kept getting re-elected. Well, guess what. There IS a problem, and if a fix isn't made, these programs WILL be killed, for everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. 10-4
Which means acknowledged. What you say is true.

Years ago, I had no hope that I would ever see any of my SS money again.
Today, I have about a dollar's worth of hope.

It certainly is gaining interest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC