Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Bipartisan support builds for Gang of Six $3.7 trillion deficit-reduction package"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 06:40 AM
Original message
"Bipartisan support builds for Gang of Six $3.7 trillion deficit-reduction package"
President Obama joined Democratic and Republican senators Tuesday in offering support for a $3.7 trillion deficit-reduction plan announced that morning by the five remaining members of the Gang of Six.

Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.), who had pulled out of the Gang of Six in May, also rejoined the group and praised the plan as something that could win the 60 votes needed to pass the Senate.

“The plan has moved significantly, and it’s where we need to be — and it’s a start,” Coburn said. “This doesn’t solve our problems, but it creates the way forward where we can solve our problems.”
http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-money/budget/172189-coburn-rejoins-gang-of-six-backs-37t-deficit-reduction-plan
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. You know, because THAT's what the already ridiculously rich need to cure their "uncertainty" . . .
. . . YET ANOTHER REAGAN-SIZED REDUCTION IN TAXES!!!

In two months, this will be their new "bar":

"You know . . . . I'm still feeling a little . . . uncertain. Not sure if these tax cuts are . . . LOW enough. I'm thinking they should be around 18 . . . no . . . FIFTEEN percent. We'll just make the workers pay for it . . . after we lay a few hundred thousand of them off just to show them who the fuck is BOSS around here."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. End-game = Flat Tax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
badtoworse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I like the idea of a flat tax
No deductions - tax is based on gross income. The objective of a tax should be to raise revenue and that is all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I'm against any plan favored by Dick Armey and Steve Forbes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
badtoworse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I make up my own mind on issues
Conservatives aren't always wrong and Progressives don't always get it right. A great deal of the corruption in the Federal Government is centered around trying to manipulate the tax code. A flat tax with no deductions would eliminate that. That is strong argument in its favor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. This seems to me like the end game all along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. Tax give aways to the uber rich paid for by starving and freezing grandmothers.
Shared sacrifice my ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC