Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who Framed the Murdochs?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 06:02 AM
Original message
Who Framed the Murdochs?
http://www.slate.com/id/2299556/

In five hours of hearings before a parliamentary committee today, witnesses Rupert Murdoch, James Murdoch, and Rebekah Brooks attempted to convince the world that they have been framed by their former News of the World employees.

The trio never accused anybody by name, but they repeatedly portrayed themselves as victims of phone-hacking underlings. They knew nothing of the practice, they claimed, until their reporter Clive Goodman of News of the World and private detective Glenn Mulcaire were charged and went to jail in 2007 for hacking the phones of "royal" family staffers. As Brooks explained, she wasn't aware that current News of the World staffers were still hacking until actor Sienna Miller filed a civil suit against the paper and she saw the documents in December.

When asked which senior staffers had lied to her about phone-hacking practices, Brooks retreated.

"Unfortunately, because of the criminal procedure, I'm not sure that it's possible to infer guilt until those criminal procedures have taken place," she said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Prometheus Bound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nasty little employees.
Bad, bad employees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. The entire thing was a disgraceful farce. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 06:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 06:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. And deeply "humbling".
"Too dumb to know this was hap'ning; smart enuff to still run the biz."

James Murdoch kept apologizing, saying he was sorry and filled with regrets and frustrated by the scandal, saying that the hacking was "inexcusable." But if he's really a betrayal victim, what does he have to apologize for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 06:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. You don't create an empire without attention to details. It was an embarrassing day for the PM's.n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I watched the first four 15-minute youtube segments of "Countdown's" coverage last night
Edited on Wed Jul-20-11 06:54 AM by pacalo
& I didn't get the impression the MP's did badly. There were a couple of MP's who outshone the others, from the four segments I watched. I'm going to watch the rest of them later this evening.

Rupert showed his cards, imo, when he couldn't contain his chuckle when he was told that the NoW had "collective amnesia". Murdoch seemed amused in a sick, appreciative way that his puppets were toeing the line as (he/his son) directed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. I saw Murdock using his Fox News formula yesterday - to put on just enough where it could be taken
to the airwaves and spun into something for the GOP, but in this case for himself and his son. It's exactly what he did and the major fail by the PM's allowed him to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
8. Damn underlings! How dare they?!?!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC