|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Donnachaidh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 05:37 PM Original message |
Too Good, Too Smart, Too Able for Wall Street Approval - Ralph Nader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scurrilous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
1. Fuck Ralph Nader. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 05:42 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Fuck snubbing the woman who should be President. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 05:43 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Such a predictable response. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 05:54 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. One which is always appropriate. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 06:07 PM Response to Reply #8 |
17. For those with a mental capacity less than that of a spoiled toddler. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 06:11 PM Response to Reply #1 |
20. Absolutely... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gort (567 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 06:32 PM Response to Reply #1 |
29. Ralph Nader supporters should have formed a Tea Party and run for local offices |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanMichael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 06:39 PM Response to Reply #1 |
31. So intelligent and accurate! I am simply stunned by the eloquence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scurrilous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-18-11 09:09 AM Response to Reply #31 |
40. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moobu2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 05:43 PM Response to Original message |
3. What a scumbag, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 05:43 PM Response to Original message |
4. I'm sure the person she appointed will be smart and able, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ikonoklast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 06:32 PM Response to Reply #4 |
28. Seeing how Warren told Obama she would set up the agency, but didn't want to run it, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bahrbearian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 06:38 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. Seeing how Obama appointed her to the position and bailed on her , why should she want it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ikonoklast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 06:51 PM Response to Reply #30 |
35. Warren never wanted it to begin with. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bahrbearian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 06:59 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Ya I remember that it was all over the news, was that before or after he pulled his support? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ikonoklast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 07:05 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Nader would never lie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ikonoklast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 07:05 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. Nader would never lie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Velveteen Ocelot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 05:43 PM Response to Original message |
6. What's wrong with the guy who was appointed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 05:54 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. There's nothing wrong with him. What's wrong is that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bahrbearian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 06:09 PM Response to Reply #6 |
18. What was wrong with Van Jones? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 05:51 PM Response to Original message |
7. There goes Ralph, trying to siphon off the votes of the gullible again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 06:14 PM Response to Reply #7 |
22. And it works... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bahrbearian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 06:00 PM Response to Original message |
10. Once again Nader is right! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bahrbearian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
11. Nader long ago proposed the things that Warren has initialed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bahrbearian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 06:02 PM Response to Original message |
12. It was Nader who wanted to raise the age of Medicare recipients. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bahrbearian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 06:04 PM Response to Original message |
13. Nader always wanted to waste our treasure on war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeSwiss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 06:04 PM Response to Original message |
14. K&R n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bahrbearian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
15. Al Gore never blamed Nader for what the Supreme Court stoled from him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
16. Fuck Ralph Nader again. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 06:10 PM Response to Original message |
19. Fuck Ralph Nader...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Big Vetolski (436 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
21. Temper! Temper! DUers! I proudly voted for Nader in 2000. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bahrbearian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 06:15 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Clinton , though he did some good things made it hard to vote for the DLC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
11 Bravo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 06:40 PM Response to Reply #21 |
32. And Roberts and Alito are forever in your debt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
24. Huffing and puffing aside, Nader reveals he isn't familiar with the deets. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bahrbearian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 06:24 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. OK , I'll bite what are the deets. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 06:26 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. I think it's a "cute" way of saying details. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bahrbearian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 06:28 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. So what are the deets? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 06:41 PM Response to Reply #27 |
33. Elizabeth Warren Never Wanted The Job... Blah, Blah, Blah... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bahrbearian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 06:43 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Thats right didn't she have a presser saying that., wasn't that on the Daily Show. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-11 07:09 PM Response to Original message |
39. Ralph, you fucking dick head! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 08:26 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC