Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Delaying Medicare eligibility is bad for health.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
ipaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 08:18 PM
Original message
Delaying Medicare eligibility is bad for health.
"This is not guesswork on our part; there’s clear evidence in the literature. In several papers, Michael McWilliams and colleagues found that utilization, spending, and outcomes for age-eligible Medicare beneficiaries differed for those who had been uninsured prior to turning 65 vs. those who had been insured. Their work was based on survey data, sometimes merged with Medicare claims. This is a relatively strong analytic approach since it exploits a discontinuity in coverage that potentially applies to nearly all individuals: the vast majority of the population enrolls in Medicare at age 65.

The authors found that, relative to those with insurance before age 65, those without insurance prior to Medicare eligibility spent much more money on health care after they became Medicare eligible. In other words, people wait to get care until their Medicare kicks in. This is bad both for health and for the federal government’s bottom line.

Delaying Medicare even longer would likely make this worse. People would forego care longer, health would suffer, and Medicare would pay for the consequences later."

http://theincidentaleconomist.com/wordpress/delaying-medicare-eligibility-is-bad-for-health/


So a rise in the age of eligibility for medicare would increase suffering and raise costs. How does this help anything?

Why propose something this stupid.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. My thought was that Obama should have proposed eligibility at 55
money would be coming in in premiums that would be less likely to be paid out. Plus, potential serious illnesses might be staunched.
And the loss of revenue could be the insurance companies pain.

Heck, let's move it to 45.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I agree.
You can't claim historic reform of health care and then declare medicare a budget buster. Unless of course there are no price controls on the for profit ins. vultures holding all the cards and our wallets.

It's so obviously a scam I am amazed some still defend it and the President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is what happens when you don't address health care costs first.
Lame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC