Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Nader's voters had instead chose Gore, there would not have been Bush* tax cuts.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 05:54 PM
Original message
If Nader's voters had instead chose Gore, there would not have been Bush* tax cuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ice Number Nine Donating Member (234 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. many of them still can't accept this.
It must be a weight upon their shoulders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
150. And they still claim that Nader had nothing to do with Bush getting elected.
Because, apparently, the 97,000 votes he got in Florida is smaller than the 5,000 or so votes that would have clinched it for Gore and preempted the entire existence of the Bush admin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fuddnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
159. I wish he would run again, so I could give him the vote I owe him from 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Al Gore won the election. Blame the supreme court.
When all the votes were counted, Al Gore was the winner. The only votes that counted ended up being 5 to 4 in Bush's favor. Get over Nader, he had every right to run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:04 PM
Original message
Right, and last fall here in WI every Democratic voter who chose not to vote had that right also,
but look what it got for the rest of us. Just because someone has the right to do something (even voting for Nader was their "right") does not make it righteous choice in the end.

It would make an interesting novel about how America would be had Gore been President for 8 years. Kind of like had the South won the Civil War.

What would have been real interesting would be if JFK jr. had lived.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
19. That's Democracy for you
it might get a little messy but it's ours. People who don't vote are stupid. As for it being a righteous choice, everyone should vote their conscience and that makes it a righteous choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #19
68. Here in Wisconsin, anyone who chose to vote for Walker or chose not to vote which helped him win,
well in my book that was not a righteous choice when so many people are hurt as a consequence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Right, and last fall here in WI every Democratic voter who chose not to vote had that right also,
but look what it got for the rest of us. Just because someone has the right to do something (even voting for Nader was their "right") does not make it righteous choice in the end.

It would make an interesting novel about how America would be had Gore been President for 8 years. Kind of like had the South won the Civil War.

What would have been real interesting would be if JFK jr. had lived.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Had there been an additional 97000 votes
for Gore that Nadir demanded "To show them" we wouldn't have Bush tax cuts or 3 wars in the ME or or or or ... Nadir is a plant and always has been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Nader didn't even hide the fact that he was trying to help the Rethugs.
And yet millions fell for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
81. No, he never changed his party affiliation from republican
ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #12
116. it's wrong to focus on Florida
Gore only needed 7,211 votes to win New Hampshire and get an electoral college win. Nader took over 22,000 votes in New Hampshire. Put New Hampshire in Gore's column and Florida and the Supreme Court become irrelevant sideshows.

But thanks to Nader, Gore almost lost Iowa, New Mexico, Oregon, and Minnesota and Wisconsin were much closer than they needed to be. http://journals.democraticunderground.com/hfojvt/118
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
25. Indeed: Gore Won
Bush cheated.

In the United States you have the right to vote for whom you want ... the vast majority of Naderites are Naderites; neither Gore nor any Democrat has any claim to those people's votes.

Whenever this topic comes up it gets me how some folks want to shift the blame for the stolen election to Nader instead of placing it clearly where it should be -- on Bush/Cheney, the cheaters, and the coup plotters on the Supreme Court.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Quite True, Sir
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
27. Not really.
I voted for Nader in 2000, to support the Green Party here in CA. My "safe state" vote for Nader had no effect on the outcome whatsoever.

As for the Nader voters in Florida, well....Gore won the election in Florida. Fat Tony had other ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #27
86. Fat Tony Never Could Have Got Near It, Sir, Without Nader's Voters In Florida
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #86
152. Indeed. That's what the "blame the Supreme Court" chorus misses.
Were it not for Nader, there would never have been a court case. There would never have been a recount. And Al Gore would have been the 43rd President of the United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TygrBright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. And if Kennedy hadn't insisted on an open car in Dallas, there wouldn't have been a Vietnam War n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. And if Hitlers Mother would have had an abortion
there would never have been a Holocaust.:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tnlefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
32. And if Katherine Harris hadn't illegally purged eligible voters from
the rolls...I truly despise that woman. she did what she did and was never even slapped on the wrist for it. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. I don't know, wasn't the meme going around then that there was no difference between Bush & Gore?
:shrug: So how did that work out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
33. Yeah, that was Nader's theme song.
There were people who actually had the nerve to say it to me. But only once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. And if Florida had counted all the votes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlabamaLibrul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. More fun to punch hippies than remember that * stole the election n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. More fun to punch hippies than actually concede that Gore did win in Florida
The OP has been shown this fact time and again, along with the fact that Gore completely screwed the pooch when it came to the recount, but he refuses to recognize these facts. His obsession with Nader completely blinds him to reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
28. I remember that Bush* stole the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capitalocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
147. If Gore voters had chosen to vote for Nader...
well, Bush probably still would've found a way to steal the election. He had the Supreme Court on his side, after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestate10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. Exactly. Now watch the pissing begin.
One of the meat line is that if Gore had won more vote, he would have won. But with tens of thousands throwing away their votes, those responsible for Bush II and near national destruction are....tadaaaaa, Nader Florida 2000 voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toddaa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
58. I've never understood this line of reasoning
Third party candidates can't win without a majority of the vote, but voting from them is wasting your vote. By that logic, everyone who votes for any candidate who does not win is wasting their vote. Unless you voted for Bush in 2000, you wasted your vote. If all those Nader voters went with Gore in Florida, then Bush voters would have wasted their vote. I guess the best way to guarantee your vote is not wasted is to choose the candidate with the best poll numbers.


America's two party system works so well, the NCAA uses it as a model for choosing the best college football team.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDemVoter Donating Member (169 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
13. And if I had a million dollars. . .
And if pigs could fly. . .

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
14. STOLEN ELECTION, don't you get it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. If the 95,000+ Florida Nader voters had voted for Gore,
the election wouldn't have ended up close enough to get stolen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xphile Donating Member (565 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #17
49. And if Gore ran a better campaign he might have gotten more of those votes.
But apparently he didn't do enough to appeal to those votes. And the Democratic party is not entitled to the vote of every person who considers themselves left of center.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #49
64. He wasn't good enough at countering Nader's lies, unfortunately.
Anyone left of center threw his or her vote away if they voted for Nader . . . and helped to ensure Bush's election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xphile Donating Member (565 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #64
90. Lies? Gore didn't bother to do much to separate himself from Bush. So he basically played up to
Edited on Wed Jun-29-11 10:10 PM by xphile
exactly what Nader called him out on. That would be Gore's fault for not doing a good job of differentiating himself. That is called Nader telling the damn truth and Gore not making him look like a liar.

And Gore would tell you his damn self how lousy a campaign he ran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #90
95. Gore did an excellent job of differentiating himself. However,
Edited on Wed Jun-29-11 10:46 PM by pnwmom
the media ignored everything he actually said because they preferred to mock him for being too "wooden," for "rolling his eyes," etc. To the media, the contest between Bush and Gore was all about personality -- all the issues got drowned in the swamp of Bush's he'stheguyyouwanttohaveabeerwith personality.

They also twisted and distorted everything Gore said to make him a laughingstock. Gore correctly took credit for helping to get a toxic waste situation cleaned up (I forget the name of the place), and the media pretended that Gore was lying about it. They also pretended that Gore had said he "invented the Internet." He never said that -- he did take credit for writing legislation that made the Internet possible. But the media had already decided to turn everything Gore said into a joke.

And then there was Nader, offering his two bits -- that there was no difference between the sleeze ball, Bush, and the environmental crusader (yes, even then) Gore. And millions of progressives who should have known better bought Nader's lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xphile Donating Member (565 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #95
107. Clearly he didn't do that great a job in the eyes of those who voted for
Nader otherwise they may have voted for Gore instead. Apparently, being DLC Republican lite wasn't enough for those who decided to go another way.

Of course it's entirely possible that Nader voters might have not voted at all. There's no way to know for sure. What we do know for sure is that Nader is not the reason Gore lost the election. The only lies involved here are the ones you and the rest of the deluded tell themselves about how Nader cost Gore the election despite all the evidence to the contrary.

And your undeserved sense of entitlement is really quite galling. Nader voters had every right to vote any damn way they chose. If the Democratic party wanted their votes then Gore should have done a better job of courting them. He didn't and people decided to vote another way. That's on Gore. Nader had every right to run. And your ridiculous temper tantrums at the nerve of people to dare vote some way you don't approve of doesn't change that.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #107
110. Nader's 95,000+ Florida voters ARE all responsible for helping
Bush to win. If only 10% of them had voted for Gore instead, we would have had a 9500 spread instead of a 500 spread -- much too large for the Bush people to pull their nasty tricks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #110
111. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
xphile Donating Member (565 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #110
128. No they weren't. Those voters had every right to vote any way they damn well wanted to.
The party was not entitled to those votes. If Gore had run a better campaign it wouldn't have been close enough to steal.

The talking point that Nader is responsible for Bush getting into office is the true lie and you have been pushing that bullshit for a decade now. It hasn't become less false by constant repetition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #128
138. If their actions predictably affect an outcome, then they are responsible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xphile Donating Member (565 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #138
139. Bullshit. There's no predicting a damn thing unless you had already decided how many votes all the
candidates get.

Your line of reasoning, for lack of a better word for the specious lines of bullshit you spew, is predicated on assuming that every person who is left of center has to vote for the Democratic party. No party is entitled to any vote that's why they go out and campaign to convince people to vote for them. Gore didn't do a very good job at it and some people voted for a party that better represented what they want in a candidate. They had every right to do that. But to say that they should have voted for Gore is to imply that they didn't have the right to vote for someone else which is complete bullshit.

Not to mention with all the shit that went wrong in the 2000 election which the Democratic party still hasn't bothered to address. But instead you focus on people who voted for Ralph Nader. Why? Probably because you're a bully with all the implications about lack of intelligence that that label implies. You can't be bothered with fixing what's actually wrong so you focus on a bunch of people you perceive to be less powerful, have fewer advocates, and are generally easier to spit upon.

It's as pathetic as your revolting sense of entitlement and really makes it difficult to take any damn thing you say seriously. The only reason why I bother is because I can't fucking stand bullies and feel someone needs to stand up to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #139
140. Should people vote for Republicans because you can't predict if you'll actually like their policies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xphile Donating Member (565 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #140
142. They didn't vote Republican. So your question is specious. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #142
145. It questions the idea that there is no responsibility because you cannot fully predict outcomes.
Edited on Fri Jul-01-11 01:50 PM by LoZoccolo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #90
141. I think the last 10 years have proven that's BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xphile Donating Member (565 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #141
143. No it didn't. All the last 10 yeas has shown is that the party has learned NOTHING as
can be seen how they are STILL acting like Republican lite but expect progressives to not actually fight them.

"We're not as bad as it could be with Republicans running things" is not a persuasive argument to get people to vote for you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #143
144. I see it differently.
I think it shows you've learned nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xphile Donating Member (565 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #144
146. You're still trying to berate people into voting for a party that's disrespecting them?
Good luck with that.

Like I said, 10 years later and not a damn thing has been learned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #17
52. And if the 200k plus Dems who voted for Bush had voted for Gore instead...
Florida would have been an easy win for Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #52
65. Many of them were elderly people befuddled by the butterfly ballot.
And many of the others had old registrations and had stopped voting as Democrats decades earlier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #65
102. sorry but no
they are people from all over america who come here to florida when they have befouled their own nests to the point as to be unliveable.
thye register as democrats but...when any dem runs they vote gop
why?well their kids already went to school back in the old home town and they dont see why they should send mine to good schools
when we have a good progressive run all the gop has to do in florida is talk about cost and all these wonderful folks from everywhere else say "no we already got __________ (FILL IN THE BLANK with a basic service they no longer directly use) and we no longer want to pay for using the _________________(fill in blank with schools roads infrastructure needs)
if you have missing votes in florida they just werent where you thought they would be because the state of florida is filled with americas retired DINOs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #65
118. So? Why are their excuses any better than the excuses of people who wanted someone better than Gore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #14
26. I believe the election was stolen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
16. Not this shit again.
Good grief!

It was the Supreme W. Court, not Nader.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. What I said and what you said can both be true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. The Supreme Court didn't take 95,000 progressive votes away from Gore.
Nader was the one who did that. The case would never have gotten to SCOTUS if Nader had listened to progressives who asked him to either not campaign in the critical swing states, or agree to vote-swapping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xphile Donating Member (565 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #22
91. Nobody took the votes away from Gore. He didn't fucking earn them. What part of
the Democratic party is not entitled to anyone's vote do you not understand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #22
103. if you had a week to bus em in
you would not find that many "progressives "in florida
just a bunch of retired northerners who USED to vote democrat but dont now that bthey are here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
18. There is a reason why so many Nader voters were limousine liberals
Hope you are enjoying your taxcuts Michael Moore and Barbara Ehrenreich!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Youth Uprising Donating Member (294 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #18
44. You've got to be fucking kidding me...
Nader voters where limousine liberals? The people who voted for the outside candidate? Not the people who voted for the establishment candidate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
20. Not necessarily true, LIEberman could possibly be president, and do exactly what the rethugs are
doing

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Lieberman had a fairly partisan voting record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #24
104. I think we are seeing the real Lieberman in action now, and I suspect if he eventually became
president, we would see that behavior exhibit itself.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
23. We would be looking at ways to lower the age for SS eligibility instead of raising it right now
Edited on Wed Jun-29-11 06:12 PM by NNN0LHI
Nader and his Larouchie type followers are not our friends. They never were.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
29. Nice to see the two minute hate is in full swing n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Are you upset about the Bush* tax cuts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. This issue is not about me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #30
46. The Bush-Obama tax cuts do suck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
34. Tedious, old and irrelevant argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #34
59. The repertoire is limited so
it sometimes becomes necessary to bring out the old chestnuts from time to time, just to have something to blather about and blame "libruls" in the process. 'Cause goddess knows IT NEVER GET OLD! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
35. You're right. They would have been called "Gore's tax cuts". They are now "Obama's tax cuts"

And President Obama supports the continuation of the "Bush tax cuts".

Does that now make them Obama's tax cuts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. They became Obama tax cuts when he made the
deal to extend them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prometheus Bound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
36. With 52% of Americans saying a third party is needed, do you think someone's getting nervous?
Support for Third U.S. Party Dips, but Is Still Majority View
Fifty-two percent believe a third political party is needed

http://www.gallup.com/poll/147461/Support-Third-Party-Dips-Majority-View.aspx?utm_source=tagrss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=syndication&utm_term=Politics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. And Bush once had a +90% approval rating
What did that suggest to you?

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prometheus Bound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #39
69. It suggests to me that a traumatic collective experience can have unusual temporary results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. Less people voted for Nader in 2004 than in 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prometheus Bound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #40
71. This is 2011 and the poll shows a majority thinks a third party is needed.
If I were one of the big two, I might be a tad concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #71
83. I think a third party is needed to split the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prometheus Bound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #83
89. That would be excellent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #89
99. How many of those 52% also meant it like that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #36
55. They'll probably get nervous when y'all can muster more than 5% in any election
Edited on Wed Jun-29-11 07:41 PM by alcibiades_mystery
:rofl:

Belief is one thing. Voting is another.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prometheus Bound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #55
72. I'm a Canadian living in China. I'm irrelevant.
I still they they must be nervous. If they aren't, they're not very prudent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
42. Another quality post from loco coco. Unrec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
43. We also wouldn't be in the debt problem we are in now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
45. And if several times more Democrats hadn't voted directly for Bush then no Bush either
Or if Gore didn't decide that "Governor Bush is right" a billion times he wouldn't have run voters to Nader.

Or if he didn't choose a backstabbing corporatist for his VP.

Or if he didn't concede, un-concede, and finally roll over.

Or if he didn't run away from his popular President who would have won by his largest margin if he could have run again.

Or if we didn't have a corrupt Supreme Court.

Or any number of things.

Go win votes instead of pissing on the heads of those who you think OWE you their allegiance regardless of how you ignore or alternatively degrade their issues and needs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
47. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
xphile Donating Member (565 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
48. If you posted less often there would be fewer stupid threads up.
Edited on Wed Jun-29-11 07:04 PM by xphile
Just sayin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
50. More Democrats voted for Bush than voted for Nader.
True.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. And if Gore would have won his homestate, Florida wouldn't have mattered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
51. If the USSC wasn't corrupt to the core, there woul've been no 9/11,
no wars in Afghanistan, Iraq & Pakistan, and no Bush tax cuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
54. And, vice-versa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cameozalaznick Donating Member (624 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
56. Or if Pat Buchanan had not run...
But you can't keep playing if only. You'll make yourself crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunasun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #56
70. That is true..blame him too .......if you are playing the 'blame game'!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AldebTX Donating Member (739 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
57. Or -a- 5-4 conservative Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
60. Nothing but the Dem version of "Clinton caused 9-11", Take responsibility.
Edited on Wed Jun-29-11 07:52 PM by readmoreoften
It makes you look weak and cowardly.

And look at the Supreme Court instead of the people you think owe you votes and allegiance when your platform represents nothing of what they want or demand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #60
85. Maybe they would have voted for Gore if they read more often.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #85
100. I voted for Nader because I do read; LIEberman sucked/s. It's why many didn't vote for Gore.
Edited on Wed Jun-29-11 11:10 PM by Mnemosyne
If I had had a clue that they would actually steal it so blatantly, I wouldn't have bothered to vote at all. I have great respect for Mr. Gore, and fully intended to vote for him; until he took on that fucking asshole turncoat as Veep, could not vote for him after that.

Seriously, why are you in such denial of the thefts of the 2000 and 2004 elections? Maybe you need to read more....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
61. you post a lot of stupid crap, but this one is really true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
62. If my aunt had balls, she would be my uncle. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
63. Thank God, junior's tax cuts had a sunset provision. Now that BHO's tax cuts have kicked in for
the wealthy, the little people will just have to suck it up and accept pillage of a goodly portion of their earned and already-paid-for social security and Medicare benefits. Now ain't this some kind of great country or what, when government will fu*k lower income people out of their benefits to pay for those tax cuts for the uber-wealthy? :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
66. Or Citizens United.
Edited on Wed Jun-29-11 08:52 PM by moondust
Of course Nader and his voters don't deserve all the blame, but doggedly staying in the race to the bitter end rather than gracefully bowing out and redirecting his voters was reckless beyond belief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Electric Monk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
67. You aren't helping. I suspect you garner more 3rd party support than bring voters to the Dem party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #67
73. Do you have a link to prove that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #73
77. The poster said "they suspect". No link needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #77
82. I suspect I've brought 40,000 voters to the Democratic Party, and 5 to third parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Electric Monk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #82
87. Which important news item are you trying to distract attention away from tonight?
You've stated before that that's your motivation for threads like this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #87
88. I'm trying to protect John Lennon's reputation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
74. So fucking boring. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #74
78. You are so fucking right. I just don't get the 'why'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbie Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #74
79. Yet here you are.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #79
114. And?
The same stupid shit, by the OP, over and over. I expressed my opinion.

What else you got?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbie Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #114
122. If you're bored, move on.
I just expressed mine.

Now what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
75. If frogs had wings, they wouldn't bump their asses when they jump.
I put those two arguments on the exact same level of relevance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
76. Is yet ANOTHER Shit Statement.
:evilgrin:

Innit?

How many does this make?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
80. uhh
if cows could fly... sumthin sumthin sumthin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
84. If Stars Hadn't Exploded Billions Of Years Ago...
There would be no Etch-A-Sketch.

Think about it...

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
92. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
93. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #93
98. I don't bother you when you're working.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #98
108. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #98
112. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Malikshah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
94. Why stop there--anyone who voted for Reagan is responsible for the mess
we're in. Every last damn one of them!!













so there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
96. precious
Edited on Wed Jun-29-11 10:50 PM by inna

:sarcasm:


:puke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
97. It's one of a multitude of "what-ifs"
It's also true that if the person who designed the "butterfly ballot" hadn't gotten all cute and original, Al Gore would have won as well.

Or if Al Gore had won his home state.

Or if the fucking SCOTUS hasn't completely discredited and shames themselves and American jurisprudence for a century.

There are probably more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
101. How dead is this horse?
Edited on Wed Jun-29-11 11:07 PM by JonLP24
Shit. You're beating on a skeleton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
105. if my aunt had balls she would be my uncle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
106. Has anyone bothered to ask Nader voters why they chose Nader instead of Gore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xphile Donating Member (565 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #106
109. No they don't. They're too busy crying at the loss of what they perceived to be something that
belonged to Gore I guess. The fact that said votes didn't belong to Gore and that the voters were entitled to choose Nader for whatever reasons they chose still hasn't crossed their minds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
113. STOP BLAMING THIS ON NADER VOTERS. BUSH STOLE THE ELECTION.
Yes, I typed in all caps, because I'm sick and tired of people blaming the Bush years on Nader voters. Yes, it would have been nice if those votes would have gone for Gore. But the fact of the matter is that Gore still won the election even without the Nader votes. Had the SCOTUS not gotten involved, if Florida had counted ALL of the votes, then we would have never had to suffer through the Bush years. So please, stop blaming Nader voters for Bush's "victory".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #113
115. But isn't what I said true?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #115
117. You're blaming it on American Citizens who exercised their right to vote for their candidate of
choice.

Either support Democracy or don't. Pick a side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #117
121. But it's true?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Electric Monk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #121
126. Like you care about truth. Hilarious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #126
131. I might not, but that does not make anything true or untrue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #131
154. ROFL. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #115
137. Actually, no it's not true.
You're building your case on a hypothetical scenario - if Nader voters had voted for Gore instead, then Bush would have never been President.

The FACT of the matter is that the rethugs STOLE the election. That is an indisputable fact, recounts clearly show that Gore would have won if all votes had been allowed to be counted. It's possible that if Gore had the extra Nader votes, he might have won. But we don't know that for a fact. It's impossible to prove a "what-if" situation. For all we know, the rethugs would have still found a way to steal the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xphile Donating Member (565 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #115
148. No it's not. What part of your argument is bloody false do you not understand? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
119. IF Gore had picked just about anyone other than LIEberman
he would have so many more votes they couldn't have stolen the election and we would never have had Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
120. Geez. Why are some people so stupid about the 2000 election?
Edited on Thu Jun-30-11 02:34 AM by Lucian
1. The Supreme Court selected Bush to be President.
2. There were people who voted for other than Nader who are equal blame for Bush winning Florida.
3. Many ballots were later found that were all for Gore.
4. That means the election was stolen.
And 5. The great thing about a democracy is that people get to vote for whomever they want.

But keep blaming Nader voters. :eyes: :eyes: :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
123. Everybody's to blame...but AL.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
124. If Bush's voters had instead chose(n) Gore, there would not have been Bush* tax cuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kick-ass-bob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
125. Lets go back farther.... If California had not voted Raygun governor
we wouldn't have had trickle down economics.

Let's see how revisionist we can get. This is a fun game. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
127. OK. Gore DID win in FL. But it should NEVER have been close enough to steal.
Gore blew it by distancing himself from the Big Dog, and acting like a total wuss. At times he ran a crappy campaign.

It should never have been close enough to steal. And now, in addition to teh Bush/Obama tax cuts and three wars, we also have (dont' forget) Citizens United. Supreme Court appointments are for LIFE. That would NEVER have happened otherwise.

It was a whole big combination of factors, Nader probably being the biggest. Oh, and for the CA voters who went for Nader because they thought it woudlnt' matter, yeah, I'd say it did. EVERY VOTE IS PRECIOUS. EVERY VOTE MATTERS. Maybe you didn't swing your state, but what did you accomplish? NOTHING. And you still turned traitor on your party, assuming you claim to be a Democrat.

I may live in a red state and my vote may not swing the Electoral College, but I will NEVER under any circumstances vote for a Puke or a third party. Because I can't know, in advance, that my vote won't matter. It matters.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
129. if only people had chosen Blur over Oasis....
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beardown Donating Member (193 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
130. But there would have been Lieberman
So who knew we not only have a Lieberman fan at DU, but one bold enough to trumpet it to the whole group? Gotta admire your guts or capability for self delusion because whichever it is you've got plenty of it.

Gore showed his hand by picking Joe "Second most hated man on DU" as his veep.

Obama showed his hand early by nominating a bunch of Wall St and banking hacks.

Now if McCain had won in 2008 and if some other liberal candidate had run for office I'm sure you'd be spewing the "If (liberal candidate) had instead chosen Obama there would be no American troops in Iraq, the Bush tax cuts would have been rolled back, we'd have a single payer health care system, the corrupt banks would not have been protected by trillions of tax payers money, the stimulus package would have provided jobs and not tax cuts, etc., etc., and you'd be wrong.

If you want progressives to vote for dems, make the dem party accountable for not being progressive enough and quite enabling them by accepting an ever smaller piece of the pie election after election. Take your fight to them, not liberals who don't accept the DLC corporate power version of the Democratic party.

By the way, a whole bunch of Florida's democratic voters voted for Bush so you might want to start kicking your own ass in between trying to shift the blame for the Democratic party losing liberal voters because of the Democratic leadership swing to the right to liberals exercising their constitutional rights and voting for liberal candidates.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
132. If Al Gore hadn't been a crappy DLC "centrist", perhaps he could've inspired more people.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
133. Another OP custom designed to unite us in common cause for the average working person..
My hat's off to you sir (or madam), your posts never fail to shed infinitely more light than heat.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #133
134. The common cause was avoiding Bush* tax cuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #134
135. Too bad that more Democrats didn't vote for Gore instead of Bush..
Every Democrat that voted for Bush was like two Nader voters in destructive power.

I'm glad you stand with me in condemning those Democrats who voted for Bush in the harshest possible terms.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VeryConfused Donating Member (725 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
136. very true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
149. If Gore hadn't been point man for the job-obliterating NAFTA, maybe Nader wouldn't have had so much
support? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
151. Why are you telling us things we already know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #151
158. It seems that the idea is still being debated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNBrewer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
153. If Gore had chosen anyone other than Joe Lieberman there would have been no Bush tax cuts
His spectacularly poor judgment in choosing that running mate cost him the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #153
156. If Clinton hadn't decided to "Quit thinking about tomorrow" while choosing instead
Edited on Fri Jul-01-11 02:42 PM by Uncle Joe
to use a young intern as a humidor and then look the American People in the eye and lie about it as opposed to telling the truth or telling us it was none of our business after having Gore stand up for him on the White House lawn to prevent from being impeached and convicted, Gore may not have been forced to choose Liebermann as a counter balance.

But even more to the point if the corporate media hadn't decided to slander and libel Gore for the better part of two years prior the selection because he did champion opening up the Internet for the people as this threatened the corporate media's business model, Gore would've won in a landslide in spite of Clinton's betrayal of his trust and Nader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baby Bear Donating Member (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
155. No Way
Jeb Bush in the governor's seat and Catherine Harris in charge of counting the votes. No way the democrats could have carried Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
157. Not this shit again. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
160. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC