Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CNN Breaking News: Obama tells congress "no vacations"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 12:10 PM
Original message
CNN Breaking News: Obama tells congress "no vacations"
They need to stay in washington to deal with the debt ceiling/budget.

President Barack Obama said Wednesday that if lawmakers can't reach a deal on raising the debt ceiling by the end of the week, they should consider canceling congressional vacations.


"We've got to get this done," he said. Lawmakers "need to be here. I've been here," he said. "You stay here. Let's get it done."



I agree with the President
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Oceansaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. k & r...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. the should "consider". boy that's telling em lol nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Leadership of the First Order. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. It's a sardonic statement...
maybe the subtlety went over your head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. +1
Jeez...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. i read it the same way you did. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Thanks...
Many people do not understand nuance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #15
42. It was uncalled for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. What else can he do, he can't order them to stay.
Congress sets it's own rules and determines when and if they go on vacation, not the President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. That is debatable.
http://malor.wordpress.com/2008/08/04/can-the-president-call-congress-back-into-session/

<snip>
What he describes—Congress not “officially” ending its session so as to prevent the President from doing something—has occurred several times before. Most recently, this past December, Senate Democrats left one member in Washington during the holiday break, who would call the chamber to order for a few minutes each day in order to keep President Bush from making recess appointments. (Democrats claimed it would also keep him from using a pocket veto, but that was not the case.)

Assuming Rep. Culberson is right about the Senate being in session, I think he’s wrong about calling a so-called “special session.” The Constitution says that the President “may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper…” So whether the Senate is technically still in session or not, the President cannot be prevented from calling the House back. The House has never, in the history of the Republic, been called into extra session by itself. But there is no constitutional barrier that would prevent the President from issuing a Proclamation (the usual means of convening an extra session) calling them back.

....more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #26
52. Before he does that, he needs to appoint Elizabeth Warren
during the recess. He should allow the recess, appoint Warren and then call Congress back into session.

I will read it as a cop-out, as giving in to Geithner, on Warren if he keeps Congress in session for hopeless discussions.

Congress needs to go home and face its voters on Medicare and Social Security cuts. If the Congressmen meet up with what my Congressman met with at his last constituent meeting, the members of Congress will be less insistent on the cuts when they get back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
27. nothing makes you happy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh noes! Not our vacations!
OK, I guess we had better get something passed. This mofo might be serious?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Remember the '10 lame duck session? Lots of good shit got done when the repubs were deprived
Edited on Wed Jun-29-11 12:54 PM by emulatorloo
of their VACAY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. That always seems to light a fire under their asses. Lazy fux, they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a kennedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. It seems like congress does do a ton O' vacation....
I'll check C-SPAN a lot, and they are never in session when I check, or it seems like they're gone a lot. Good for you Mr. President. :applause: :applause: :applause: :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. They should get one or two weeks a year, like the rest of us...
who are fortunate enough to get any vacation at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. But do we really need them in session that much longer?
Think of the extra damage they could do, especially the House. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
39. That's exactly what I was thinking
Of course, I use to live in Texas, where we actively discouraged meetings of the Lege.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. yep...
and should have a similar amount of spending money. Hell, I am banking my vacation because I can't afford to go anywhere. I am not into the whole "staycation" thing (the ass who coined that word was probably rich)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. K/R - hit the procrastinators where they live.
Their constituents ought to be disgusted by the politicized foot-dragging, but most of them are oblivious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tweeternik Donating Member (137 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. K&R ... give 'em hell, Barack!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
12. Not exactly.
He urged them to forgo vacations, more like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. he really can't do any more than that. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #23
50. He can convene either or both houses
Article II section 3. Though I suppose they could immediately go into recess at that point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
13. But then how will he make a recess appointment of Elizabeth Warren?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Trust you to find the flying insect in the unguent.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. That's the beauty of it as far as he's concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. The excuse to not do that also was my immediate concern too!
Edited on Wed Jun-29-11 07:20 PM by cascadiance
We need her appointed Obama. If you don't want her in that office, we really need to know and we need to know WHY you don't want her there!

If there's no good reason and you don't follow through, I hope damn well that we can get Clarence Thomas off the bench in one fashion or the other damn soon, so that we can FORCE you, Mr. Obama, to pick a progressive justice to replace him during the election, since with all of your actions have us trust you less and less what you will do come 2012 when there's no election pressure on you any more.

I either want you taking risks now to take on the economic royalists (as FDR would call them and did when he was in charge), or I want to have an option to replace you and not have it be a Republican and not fear losing the Supreme Court in the process if that outcome somehow were to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
16. Let the idiots desert Washington if they want to.
The Democrats can stay and get something done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
russspeakeasy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #16
35. some of the dems would have to desert too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
19. So forceful
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
25. "Hey. No fair."






"I've got a lot of PAC slush
money I need to spend."




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SnakeEyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #25
40. Actually..
the GOP are preventing the recess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
28. Told ya.
If they do go on vacation in August, as I predicted they would try in February, they need not bother coming back:

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/sofa%20king/100
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
30. oh well, so much for recess appointments. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. There will not be a recess either way. GOP will refuse to adjourn & go into proforma session
Edited on Wed Jun-29-11 10:02 PM by Tx4obama

The last time the Senate was supposed to go into 'recess' the GOP blocked adjournment and the Senate went into a 'pro-forma session'.
This time the GOP will do the same and block adjournment - they will do every thing they can so stop President Obama from being able to make any recess appointments.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. They would be more likely to actually let Harry get a real recess if Obama demands they don't do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
32. Fucking sleezebags week off week on what bullshit! They've been doing it for months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
33. Update - Senate Dems discuss canceling July 4 recess
Senate Dems discuss canceling July 4 recess

06/29/11 03:27 PM ET

Senate Democrats will discuss canceling the July 4 recess after President Obama chided Congress publicly on Wednesday for taking breaks while debt-ceiling talks are stalled.

A Democratic aide confirmed Wednesday that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and the caucus will discuss being in town next week.

SNIP

http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-money/budget/169045-senate-dems-to-discuss-canceling-july-4-recess
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
russspeakeasy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
34. mild weather passes for "breaking news" on cnn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. True that. But Republicans passing gas passes as "breaking news" at Fox!!
Boehner just farted!! OMG!!!

LoL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
37. Take away their allowance, too, Mr President.
And make them pass that damned ceiling debt bill.

Make 'em do it!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
41. I agree there is no reason to leave the cesspool unless they finish their work
with a/c and other conveniences the days of escaping the summer are over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 04:25 AM
Response to Original message
43. CONgress is ALWAYS on vacation....
stealing money and stuffing your pockets with corporate cash is tough work... you gotta be in good shape to be a thief in CONgress.

Of course.. you could move over to the Senate where things are more laid back... bigger opportunity and bigger cess pool over there. Hell.. look at Joe Lieberman.. he has managed to game the system for how many years now? And he still isn't wearing an Orange jumpsuit. See.. crime DOES pay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Serve The Servants Donating Member (187 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 05:45 AM
Response to Original message
44. What is this strange term "Vacation" of which you speak?
Edited on Thu Jun-30-11 06:26 AM by Serve The Servants
Edit: Never mind. I did some quick research and I found out that in ancient times it was quite common for individuals and families of modest means to regularly take a set period of time away from their established profession or place of employment to pursue hobbies and/or leisurely activities. It is a common belief amongst modern scholars that these people would continue to earn a wage while performing the rituals of "vacation" as well as having their position of employment remain intact upon their return, but this is yet to be confirmed. Vacation rituals were often performed throughout the year, many times coinciding with religious holidays and other periods of celebration, usually for a time period of no more than 2 weeks; however, the ritual length as well as frequency often varied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janet118 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #44
53. Yeah, I thought Obama was . . .
caving to another GOP demand that American workers get no vacations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Serve The Servants Donating Member (187 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. My post was obviously satire, but
it might as well have been written 100 years into the future, or maybe 20 years from now with the rate things are going...

If the trend of employers preferring part time or independent contractors over standard full time employees continues, no one will be able to afford time off, unless they extend those perks for those employees who fall into that category.

Personally, I haven't had a paid vacation in almost 5 years and when I did take time off at my last company, there was a subtle vibe that I was inconveniencing the other people at my job. Trust me, I wasn't in an important enough of a position that I should feel that way. That being said, I feel zero sympathy for congress.

Here's a couple of real articles on this:
http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/3233/what_vacation_days/
http://blog.bt-store.com/does-america-believe-in-vacation

Here's a completely different idea - Unlimited vacation time.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=129137542
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
45. And how does he intend to enforce that? Will he send DHS Agents to their homes to drag them out?
The last time I read the Constitution I missed the part where it says that the President can set the schedule of either the Congress or of any particular Congressman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. public pressure. but then posters above are pissed he didnt force them, though he cant
seems like he is being called out every way. if he says nothing, i am sure there are those that are pissed he said nothing.

he challenged, in public. public pressure. the best he can do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #45
47. Not the Constitiution. Antiterrorism laws.
Once the government defaults in the middle of three wars, the President can declare a national state of emergency, activate FEMA, and use its extra-Constitutional authority to do pretty much whatever he wants.

Thanks to all those laws, the President can "relocate" a Member of Congress back to DC. He can send a team of Navy SEALs to do it, if he wants, because those same antiterrorism laws allow the President to use the armed forces as police on home soil. He also gets to set their wage rates, so he can cut their pay to zero while he takes them into custody.

Or more alarmingly, perhaps, once established as a dictator with supreme power, the President can "relocate" Members of Congress right the hell out of DC, never to return, while prevailing upon states to postpone elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #45
49. Umm... Article II, Section 3. It's right there
He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper; he shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
48. hey, if he tells them to stay in washington, then they'll go into recess and he can make his appoint
ments. i know they need to do this debt ceiling thing. but whatever he says to do they seem to do the opposite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
51. Might be smarter to let them go home and face their constituents
Edited on Thu Jun-30-11 11:15 AM by JDPriestly
on Medicare and Social Security. It's a tough call, but I would send them home for a weekend and then bring them back.

I'm not sure Obama could do that. Obama needs a recess so that he can name Elizabeth Warren. By holding Congress over, he avoids having to make that decision.

Wimping out again.

Mr. President, whose side are you on? Ours or theirs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC