Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dumbass (Johnson- WI) threatens to tie up Senate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:19 AM
Original message
Dumbass (Johnson- WI) threatens to tie up Senate
By JONATHAN ALLEN | 6/28/11 3:07 PM EDT Updated: 6/28/11 7:15 PM EDT
Sen. Ron Johnson’s new to the Senate, but he’s starting to understand the power of one senator to stand in the way of the chamber’s business.

The freshman Wisconsin Republican, a favorite of tea party activists, threatened Tuesday to delay Senate business if Democrats don’t move forward with a budget plan.

“I will begin to object,” Johnson said in a brief Tuesday afternoon floor speech. “I will begin to withhold my consent.”

He later backed down and let the Senate go ahead with its business.

But Johnson had once again shown that a single senator can tie up the legislative process by refusing to agree to routine “unanimous consent” agreements that quickly dispense with complex Senate procedures. Those objections can be overcome by 60-vote supermajorities, but a senator determined to stand in the way of all business can effectively grind the chamber nearly to a halt by forcing all actions to undergo the rigorous cloture process.

Democrats, who are defending 23 seats in next November’s election, have not drafted a budget resolution for the fiscal year beginning Oct. 1, and Republicans are hitting them on the campaign trail for failing to govern.

But the political price of a full-on budget debate could be worse than the gridlock Johnson is threatening. A budget resolution would draw an endless string of Republican amendment votes designed to expose fault lines within the Democratic Party, and there’s no guarantee that politically vulnerable Democrats would vote for their own party’s budget at the end of the process — meaning party leaders might expose their rank and file to tough votes only to watch the resolution fail on the floor.



Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0611/57954.html#ixzz1Qg7jIjaH

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0611/57954.html

Johnson said that next week he's going to hold his breath until his face turns blue if the Democrats don't stop being so mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Looks like Rick Scott's brother with hair.
Seriously, is somebody cloning?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. 1. Reasonable Wisconsinites apologize for Ron Johnson. 2....
...Progressives have a plan. Is the Democratic Party progressive?



http://cpc.grijalva.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=70
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. 2. The Democratic Party is as progressive as the people who run and win the primaries.

The Democratic Party is controlled by the people who win the Democratic primaries. The DNC is controlled by the people who are elected as delegates. Think tanks, etc have no binding power over the Democratic Party. Only elected officials and delegates possess that.

I can't say that enough. Nobody controls the Democratic Party except for elected officials and delegates. Nobody. Those officials may do what others tell them to do, but they, and they alone, are allowed to make the decisions, even if that decision is to bow down to someone else.


FYI: Chairman of the DNC is selected by the delegates. Contrary to a lot of DU misinformation, a sitting Democratic President does not "appoint" the Chairman of the DNC, s/he "nominates" a candidate for that appointment. Delegates almost never go against a President from their party. It would pretty much destroy the administration if they did.

Bob Dole, for instance, took a *huge* hit when the delegates rejected his proposals for the Republican platform in 1996. If he couldn't lead his party, people reasoned, how would he lead the entire country?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Thanks for your post. One more good reason to be active at the grass roots level. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. What a prick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. I believe these are the first words he's spoken in the Senate
Edited on Wed Jun-29-11 10:41 AM by undeterred
since he's become a senator. He's that stupid. Probably read it off his hands Palin-style.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bikesein Donating Member (116 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. I Miss Russ
Every single day...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. He'll be back.
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. POS
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlanCranston Donating Member (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. a lot of the freshman in 1994 were booted out in 2000 and 2006
given that Wisconsin is usually a blue state, we should be able to boot him out in 2016.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. He got in the same day Walker was elected.
Edited on Wed Jun-29-11 06:34 PM by undeterred
It was an epidemic of stupid. There were a lot of Republican and Independent voters who had previously voted for Feingold who had a "throw the bums out" attitude toward all Democrats. The remorse over this guy isn't as acute, but I am sure that a lot of the same people who regret voting for Walker are also remorseful.

This guy just isn't a good Senator. He is so stupid that we are all embarrassed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
12. we should tie him up, and tar and feather him
before we throw his ass into Boston Harbor...

...actually, I take that back, I the harbor is polluted enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC