Does MB think everyone who wants a skills upgrade should receive it on my tax dollars? I hope so,

[patrice]

but I bet not.

I don't understand why Bachman thinks this is an appropriate defense for taking federal SUBSIDIES, unless she thinks any/all employees should receive this kind of money and if she doesn't think this, then she needs to tell us why her husband's employees are more deserving than so many others.

Why didn't her husband just hire people with the appropriate professional qualifications, instead of making us make up for the fact that he wanted that kind of help on the cheap?

[PoliticAverse]

1. It's not a subsidy if you get it, only if someone else gets it... n/t

[patrice]

2. Yep. IOKIYAR co-relate 1.1.

[arcane1]

3. I would LOVE for someone to ask her, straight up:

do you think it's ok for federal tax dollars to be spent to provide job training to employees of private mental health services?

My answer is "yes", but if she gives that same honest answer, her teabagger endorsement is GONE!! After all, that muslin socialist usurper once proposed spending tax money on job training, and it was considered the work of the devil! :D

[patrice]

4. Me too!! but it will NEVER happen.

I also think that sort of thing is way more common than we know; it's a form of bribery. Jobs are ALL about politics.