Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: (Obama's) N.L.R.B. Rules Would Streamline Unionizing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 11:29 AM
Original message
NYT: (Obama's) N.L.R.B. Rules Would Streamline Unionizing

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/22/business/22labor.html?_r=2

By STEVEN GREENHOUSE
Published: June 21, 2011

In a move that pleased labor unions, the National Labor Relations Board proposed new rules on Tuesday to speed up unionization elections.

The labor board wants to tighten the process by ensuring that employers, employees and unions receive needed information sooner and by delaying litigation over many voter-eligibility issues until after workers vote on whether to unionize.

The labor board’s news release and fact sheet did not explain how much the election process might be shortened as a result of the proposed regulations. But according to the board, the median amount of time from the filing of a petition for an election to the actual balloting was 38 days in 2008. The average time was 57 days.

Unions have long complained that it takes too many weeks after the petition is filed for a secret-ballot election to be held. They say the process gives management too much time to mount an antiunion campaign with videos and one-on-one sessions with workers.

American companies have repeatedly opposed any effort to shorten the period from petition to vote, saying it would become harder for managers to tell workers about the disadvantages of unionizing and to ensure that workers got both sides of the story.

FULL story at link.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. the disadvantages of unionizing
What would those be, exactly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. The Main Disadvantage of Trying to Form a Union is Being Illegally Fired
The employer needs time to identify the organizers and get rid of them.
The more time they have, the easier it is for them to make it appear legal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I understand that.
But they do have a anti-union mantra as well, don't they? What are the salient points of their propaganda?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. It happened to me in 1980

It took over 3 & 1/2 years to win in US Appellate Court. It is a much longer wait to get your day in court nowadays.

OS

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredStembottom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. For my friends in GD:P
IF these small changes happen....
and IF they help workers....
I promise to "like Obama" more - in proportion to how much they help struggling people in my life.

I need these types of actions. I don't need another speech. I need actual help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R...nt
Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ship of Fools Donating Member (899 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. quelle surprise
BHO is pro union. Who'da thunk around here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eilen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
8. That is positive-- will it pass?
I would have more faith if union friendly legislation are as heavily pushed as free trade agreements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
9. Excellent!
Edited on Wed Jun-29-11 09:55 AM by woo me with science
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC