Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chief Justice John Roberts' Plutocratic Ambitions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 06:44 AM
Original message
Chief Justice John Roberts' Plutocratic Ambitions
via truthdig:




No Public Money for Arizona Candidates
Posted on Jun 27, 2011


In a second major ruling Monday, U.S. Supreme Court justices split along ideological lines to reject an Arizona campaign finance law that offered public funding to candidates unable to raise the enormous sums of money needed to run for political office.

In Chief Justice John Roberts’ personal and bizarre parallel universe, the law inhibited “robust and wide-open political debate,” a remark that no doubt pleased the conservative plaintiffs who complained that the use of public money negated their private fundraising efforts. An appeals court had previously upheld the Arizona law, stating that none of the accusers could cite a spending or fundraising decision made in fear of triggering the release of an opponent’s matching funds.

After the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling 17 months ago, Monday’s decision is a familiar endorsement of the idea that spending money is the equivalent of free speech, that corporate “citizens” are entitled to bigger megaphones and more time at the podium than the living, breathing kind, and that the have-nots may not play with the haves. —ARK

The Wall Street Journal:

Arizona said its public-financing system promoted free speech by giving candidates the opportunity to run for office without depending on private political donors. But the law’s challengers—five conservative politicians and two political action committees—said the law stifled free speech. They argued that, when they raised and spent money to promote their messages, their speech was punished because it triggered government subsidies to their rivals.

The Supreme Court’s conservative majority agreed with the challengers in a 5-4 ruling.

... “Laws like Arizona’s … that inhibit robust and wide-open political debate without sufficient justification cannot stand,” he (Chief Justice John Roberts) wrote, joined by Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito.

Read more



http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/no_public_money_for_arizona_candidates_20110627/?ln





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 06:48 AM
Original message
He's a menace. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
8. Fuck yeah, he is.
Roberts is deadly, the main gatekeeper of the plutarchy.

A presidential election was stolen primarily in order to put him in power.

The math is just simple addition after that, but the numbers in the equation are huge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's a contradiction of Citizens United.
By his rationale, Roberts overturned this decision with invalidating Arizona's public finance of elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. That's what I thought.
The People of Arizona are now a different class under this ruling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I can't believe that an equal protection argument wasn't made.
And if I'm wrong and it was made, that it didn't prevail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. This is the same Faux/conservative arguement that if you offer an opposing
idea you are somehow affecting their rights to be right I guess.
It is like they have lost the ability to reason in a society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bragi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
5. The goal is simple: to weaken non-corporate voices
What about that is hard to understand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
6. Robert Byrd made a huge blunder when he trusted...
John Roberts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. They want to go back to the Founding Fathers era
Slavery and indentured servitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
9. K&R #17 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC