Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So if we brought all the troops home tomorrow, how many homeless shelters would need to be built?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 12:55 AM
Original message
So if we brought all the troops home tomorrow, how many homeless shelters would need to be built?
Will the majority be coming home to jobs, or no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bringing the troops home != Kicking troops out of the military
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TriMera Donating Member (885 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. If they are Reserve or Nat'l Guard, they are coming home to jobs.
Edited on Tue Jun-28-11 01:09 AM by TriMera
If they are regular military, they still have a job in the military until their length of service is reached. After that, they can re-up if they wish.

Edited to add (for clarification): Reserve and Nat'l Guard will come home to jobs if they had jobs when they left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. If we brought all the troops home,
with the money we will save from the wars, we could likely provide housing for everybody in America that doesn't have it.

Of course in reality, any money saved from shutting down the wars would simply go towards tax cuts for the rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cid_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I wonder about this sometimes...
If you just magically poofed every homeless person in America a 2 bedroom apartment, do you think that would turn out well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Yes. It would turn out very well.
I used to work for a homeless project. Getting people into good housing and especially if the housing is actually mixed into housing in which people who are not homeless are living, works very well for most of them. Having access to regular showers, cooking facilities, a table, chairs, all the things that help us function as humans would change their lives for the better.

I have a friend who was homeless and then got a place in a decent neighborhood. Totally changed her personality. It was wonderful!

It won't completely change all homeless people. But it will help them all, and drastically change a lot of them.

One of the guys in our shelter in downtown LA found out about a job in Orange County. He had no transportation to get to the interview so he started walking. It was ridiculous to try to do that. But that is how much so many homeless people want to have a chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneGrassRoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 04:43 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Thank you for sharing that. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cid_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
25. As open as I left that...
... you are probably right.

If there was an infinite money pot that would allow for free housing and cleanup in perpetuity but in my mind the goal is to get them to a productive and self sustaining state.

I think they would take it as long as you would give it, trash it once it stopped coming and head back to the streets when it was all gone. That is all generalities ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. You really think they would send the money that way?
Lol. They would probably pass another tax cut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarsInHerHair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
6. & how well could a new G.I. Bill ameliorate that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 02:22 AM
Response to Original message
7. Bring the troops home. Put our military industry to work
creating a green economy and a healthy environment.

What do we get in exchange for our wars? Oil.

So, if we brought our troops home, we would need their efforts to help us create energy sources that don't require so much oil.

Of course, part of the work in a green economy is in upgrading not only our grid and energy delivery facilities and systems but our homes, offices, churches, schools, hospitals and manufacturing plants (what is left of them) to use less energy. Lots of our soldiers could be employed doing that.

We would just be taking money now spent by the government on wasteful military equipment, air conditioning in the desert and having the government transfer that money to be spent here on our green economy.

It would not add to the deficit. It would probably lower the deficit especially if we started the building upgrades on our federal and state government buildings, schools and other publicly owned buildings.

I say, let's bring the troops home now and set an example for the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
10. We can put them to work in our factories like we did after Vietnam
Oh, wait a minute.

Most of our factories are gone now.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
11. K&R Put America back to work and wipe away toxic mortgages....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
12. zero?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. zero shelters or zero jobless?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. This ain't WWII. it ain't even Vietnam.
We don't have a gigantic standing army of draftees that will be disbanded. We have a permanent relatively small by post WWII standards standing army augmented by part timers (made more or less full time by the endless global war bullshit) in the reserves and national guards. The reservists and national guard units would be the ones 'coming home' and they would for the most part pick up where the left off.

Will some be homelesss - yes of course. Will some be jobless - yes of course. Will we, as we have done for the last 30 years, do fuck all about it - yes of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
13. Suddenly bringing home all the active duty troops does not necessarily
make them homeless.

Many have quite a length of time left on their enlistments. They will not be jobless or homeless.

Closing all the military sites worldwide and bringing home all those personnel and the families (many are on accompanied tours) is, IMHO, doable.

Distribute all the returnees among the military sites stateside and see an influx of dollars in the local economies.

Closing all the sites in other countries saves a pile of money currently being spent on leases, upkeep, and local civilian worker salaries.

Gradually reduce the total size of the military via normal attrition as enlistments expire and reduced recruiting efforts.

Stop being policemen to the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
15. uh,they'd still be.... employed by the military and living on base...
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Only until the end of their enlistment for active duty. Then whut?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. but that would be the same regardless if they were currently in Afghanistan now or not. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. No, it would not. If they were home, they could at least network.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #17
23. they could reenlist if they wanted to? granted, it'd be tough to find private sector jobs, but
no one's forcing them out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
16. Gosh, good point. Better just leave them there, then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. No, better point is that Ickyfuckingleaker better get busy with his job creation, as they will be
coming home one way or another. Maybe he's counting on the boxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
19. If we started a true job creation program, none.
But even if we don't do such a thing, we still need to bring the troops home, now. Otherwise we will continue to spend our way into oblivion.

And frankly, given the number of people who are unemployed, the troops that are abroad and would brought home, they would be a drop in the bucket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roomfullofmirrors Donating Member (201 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
24. many of them will be using newly earned GI bill benefits and attending college.
then they'll be competing in the job market. Their honorable service will give them lots of solid resume filler.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC