Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Eugene Robinson: Why Does the War Go On?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 06:27 AM
Original message
Eugene Robinson: Why Does the War Go On?
from truthdig:




Why Does the War Go On?

Posted on Jun 24, 2011
By Eugene Robinson


Some heard a declaration of victory, others an admission of defeat. The many contradictions in President Obama’s speech about Afghanistan Wednesday night were perhaps intended to obscure the bottom line: Tens of thousands of American troops will remain for at least three more years, some of them will be maimed or killed, and Obama offered no good reason why.

The only debate within the administration, it appears, was whether to bring home the troops far too slowly or not at all. Obama decided on the too-slowly option.

A year from now, we will have withdrawn the more than 30,000 “surge” troops Obama ordered into combat 18 months ago. But this means nearly 70,000 U.S. troops will remain in Afghanistan—about double the number deployed there when Obama took office. A “process of transition,” in which Afghans take responsibility for the country’s security while Americans come home, is supposed to be complete in 2014. But it sounds as if some sort considerable deployment will remain in a “support” role.

In other words, there will be three more years of war followed by a long-term presence of unspecified magnitude. .......(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/why_does_the_war_go_on_20110624/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. "In other words, there will be three more years of war followed by..."
more war. We are a hostile occupying force in a land that does not want to be occupied (what land does?). The 'war' a.k.a Turkey Shoot will continue, unabated by Obama's speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftistboy Donating Member (89 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. ....
Edited on Fri Jun-24-11 07:17 AM by leftistboy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. K&R. I hope we can withdraw sooner.
Our President got Osama bin Laden. Let's leave now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. It's achieved sentience now
The war is self-justifying, self-perpetuating. It just is. Accept it as a fact of life, like you do the earth's rotation. For as sure as the sun rises in the east, the United States must be at war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. quote: "Nor was there any indication that he had thought through the mellifluous passages.."
From Eugene:

"Nor was there any indication that he had thought through the mellifluous passages designed to put the war into a broader foreign policy context. We cannot “retreat from our responsibility” but also cannot be “overextended,” and therefore we must “chart a more centered course.” We must be “as pragmatic as we are passionate, as strategic as we are resolute.” If you have any idea what this means, please let me know.

Obama did say that when military intervention is called for, it should be international rather than unilateral. As an example, he cited Libya, where NATO is nominally in charge. He must have missed the speech by his outgoing defense secretary, Robert Gates, who warned that NATO is devolving into a toothless joke."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. There does seem to be a disconnect.
We vote for Gore. We get Bush.

We vote for Obama. We get, uh, war.

Not blaming Obama -- I'm blaming the national security state which does not answer to the voters or the President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
7. Defense contractors gotta make those sales targets!
What, we need another sector of the economy to shut its doors? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
8. Oil pipelines nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
10. Mr. Robertson gets it.
we are never leaving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Oh, we WILL leave.


An everybody knows it too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Well, there is always that way...
which, I might add, given the current level of governmental justification for our continual involvement over there, is probably the only way we will leave.

However, I think our leaving will be more on a scale of how the Soviets left.

It will be even less pretty than our leaving of Viet Nam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yeah, you'd think they would want to avoid that, but instead the knee-jerk stalling continues.
Thus ensuring that when it does happen, it will be ugly. Not that it is not already ugly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classysassy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-11 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
14.  One word
Money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC