Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

British, French agents undercover in Libya to get Gaddafi: Report

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
jakeXT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 07:02 PM
Original message
British, French agents undercover in Libya to get Gaddafi: Report
Edited on Thu Jun-23-11 07:03 PM by jakeXT
London, June 19 (ANI): A team of 130 British and French agents are reportedly on a one-million-pound-a-week, do-or-die deep undercover mission in Libya to get Colonel Muammar Gaddafi.

The British security service MI6 and France's Directorate-General for External Security agents will hunt for the dictator in Operation Fire And Forget, the Daily Star reports.

According to a senior security source, these agents are personally sanctioned by UK PM David Cameron and French President Sarkozy, the paper said.

Members of the team speak the language, have lived in the country for years, and have made good contacts or landed jobs in key areas.

...

http://in.news.yahoo.com/british-french-agents-undercover-libya-gaddafi-report-124708307.html

that's nearly 7700 pounds per assassin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. you mean to get that light sweet crude
Edited on Thu Jun-23-11 07:04 PM by amborin
granted, Ghadaffi is evil but let's admit what this is really about
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Open public assassinations, the new policy, sounds like.
Who else we got on the hit list?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Distant Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. But dare any brown-skin try to do the same in their countries and WHOA -- TERRORISTS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Distant Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. This was the usual MO in the good old colonial days -- almost every leader not bought was killed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Remember when the imperialists used to have
covert operations. Now they invade sovereign, independent countries (to steal resources), violate international law and tell legitimate leaders that they have come to kill them.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Distant Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Interesting which ones don't have to go: Emir of Bahrain, Dictator of Syria, Junta of Burma, etc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Calling Qaddafi a "legitimate leader" is a bit of a stretch...
We're definitely playing wicked games of would-be conquest, but he seized power in a coup.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. And the USA supported him, in a fashion.
"the United States government judged that Gaddafi was sufficiently anti-Marxist and thus acceptable."
despite Britain's plan to support an overthrow of him.

So he was "legitimatized" until he wasn't anymore. ( not denying that he has done awful things, just saying USA DID support him early after the coup)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muammar_Gaddafi

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Distant Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. by that definition, which of the Emirs, Kings, dictators the US supports are ligitimate?
Edited on Sun Jun-26-11 11:19 AM by Distant Observer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fool Count Donating Member (878 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Those pathetic fuck-ups Sarkozi and Cameron
couldn't mount anything of that magnitude if their lives depended on it. This is just a psyop-type disinformation to scare Qaddafi into
resigning and people around him into defecting. Sarkozi and Cameron must be getting really desperate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Distant Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. MI6 et al has been planning Gaddafi assassination w Libyan allies for year. No luck so far
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Don't be so sure.
The French and British militaries and intelligence agencies aren't to be dismissed lightly.

This has been a pathetic on-the-cheap operation, and I'll bet they're both rather pissed at us for not doing more of the heavy lifting. They're all also probably annoyed that their arrogant assumption that Qaddafi would fall immediately just didn't come to pass.

What an ugly escapade this is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mazzarro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. So this shit has moved from being "civilian protection" to being "assassination" trip?
And those in support of this still have the gall to call it a humanitarian crap? Shame on United Nations and their continued silence of this massive neo-colonial mistake the organization has been suckered into!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Distant Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. " . . .the most protracted and least surreptitious assassination attempt in history,"

George Will. I he should know, being often on the side of the imperialists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Distant Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. kick, for the "humanitarianism" of it all
Edited on Thu Jun-23-11 09:54 PM by Distant Observer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
16. the Daily Star reports...
The Daily Fucking Star.

A newspaper about as reliable as a chocolate fireguard. It makes the Daily Mail look like a paragon of journalistic virtue. Today's front page has a headline about Prince Harry apparently falling for a reality TV show "star", 6 of the last 7 days headlines about been about footballer Ryan Giggs. I've no doubt they've been running crap stories urging the government to "send the boys in" or some shit and this is their own follow-up.

It's a right-wing rag owned by a right-wing pornographer (Richard Desmond) and frankly, I wouldn't use it to wipe my arse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Distant Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. OH you mean like the New York Times endless reports regarding WMD all over Iraq
Edited on Sun Jun-26-11 12:46 PM by Distant Observer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. No
I mean an absolutely unreliable, bullshit-mongering rag.

No one, and I mean absolutely no one takes the paper seriously. It's a kids comic for grown-ups complete with soft-core porn on page 3. People buy it because it's funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Distant Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. And that determines the validity of the report and their sources. N. Equirer said Edwards cheated

Other rags told the truth about WMD and Iraq.

None of the MSM dared print stories that are really taboo in officialdom
because they don't want to be excluded from
the access they have as part of the ruling system.

I have never posted a story from National Enquirer or Daily star etc, but that does
not mean they are not more likely to print taboo but true stories than the NYT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. I'm not arguing the validity of other papers
The Daily Star is a comic. It isn't news. It isn't a real newspaper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestate10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
19. I hope they find him and put several bullets through his skull. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
20. I must presume the shipment of LSD-soaked Ukrainian nurses were left untouched?
Edited on Sun Jun-26-11 01:54 PM by Poll_Blind
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
21. Explain why assassinating that butcher Gaddafi is a bad thing?
OK, it's technically illegal.

But other than that, why is allowing him to stay alive and in power after all the murdering he's done desirable? As far as I'm concerned, the world would be a better place with him not in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC