Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scientists discover new California quake fault that could burst dam and drown thousands

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
AsahinaKimi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 09:04 PM
Original message
Scientists discover new California quake fault that could burst dam and drown thousands

Flood plane: The Martis Creek Dam, which could burst if the fault shifts

Polaris Fault could trigger 6.9-magnitude earthquake
Martis Creek Dam could burst if fault moves
Gambling city Reno, 33 miles away, is at risk of flood

A new earthquake-producing fault has been discovered in California - to the surprise of scientists who thought they had found all of the state’s seismic danger spots.

The Polaris line, at only 22 miles long, is a dwarf compared to the San Andreas Fault, which stretches 800 miles and has triggered some of the world’s biggest tremors.

But, worryingly, it could be powerful enough to cause an earthquake measuring 6.9 on the Richter Scale and flood a valley by smashing a dam.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2004293/New-quake-fault-discovery-California-burst-dam-drown-thousands.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Peregrine Donating Member (712 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. OMG, ban hydroelectric its too dangerous
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Do we get to choose which "thousands"?
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
necso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-11 06:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. Imo,
geomorphic evidence (and sometimes patterns of vegetation, where faults affect water flow) can point to faults, even where more accepted methods of identifying faults (fault-related stratigraphic discontinuities; other surface indicators; seismic testing) don't.

And sometimes, once you get a rough handle on formational events and tectonic patterns (as these change over time), you can look at existing fault maps and get some idea of where more faults (fault continuations) seem likely to be.

However, some faulting seems more related to formational events (which may or may not be ongoing (or "relic"), or may be of diminished power), some more to later/larger-scale tectonic patterns (formation and tectonics aren't unrelated; but tectonic patterns can change over time, so formational events may have been driven by older tectonic patterns that no longer exist -- or at least aren't as important now); and interplay between the two can complicate the picture.

...

Ships of stone
sailing earthen seas
on winds of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC