Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Look, anyone surprised at how Debbie Wasserman Schultz is treating Weiner needs to read up.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:19 PM
Original message
Look, anyone surprised at how Debbie Wasserman Schultz is treating Weiner needs to read up.
This is just par for the course.....this is how she treats progressives:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3905348

She's only cutthroat when it comes to progressives, and definitely not her buddies, the right-wing Diaz-Balarts:

http://downwithtyranny.blogspot.com/2008/07/another-exceptional-candidate-debbie.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Preach it! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wow, is she ever an asshole. Thanks for the links.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. k/r rec. thanks
I'm going to bookmark for later
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Best not say anything about Debbie Wasserman Schultz here.
She seems to be a wunderkind.

I was off her when she supported the Diaz-Balarts over Raul Martinez and Joe Garcia. Raul Martinez was popular, and with a little help, he could have won. Joe Garcia could have had a good run and a possible upset.

When I brought that fact here, I was told that she had to work with the Diaz-Balarts, so she couldn't oppose them. She was the Chair of the RED TO BLUE in Florida. She should have been out there for the Democratic Candidates, not the Roopublicons.

Now she is DNC chair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. You have to admit, it was not at all surprising
that this administration chose her to be DNC chair.

Perfect choice, if the goal was to choose someone whose approach to politics (tongue-baths for your enemies and sharp kicks to the backside for your friends) perfectly mirrored the White House's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #7
33. She's my DINO. Dee-dee DINO.
I live in her district. :(

--imm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
41. smartest comment on the
entire thread. You got a dino prez and now you have DWS. duh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
69. She was shrill during the primaries in her support for Hillary's campaign.
Edited on Tue Jun-14-11 03:03 PM by Liberal_Stalwart71
However, I do like her. Yes, she's a moderate to conservative Democrat but I like the way she goes after Republicans. She handed Prebus his ass the other day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #69
94. You'd have to agree though, that it's unforgiveable for her to protect the Diaz-Balarts
No Democrat should ever be involved in saving the political careers of people who dream of running Cuba as their own personal casino/whorehouse again.

The hardline wing of the Miami exiles should be completely blacklisted in American politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exultant Democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
90. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. People here love her because she goes on TV a lot. I forgot who said it but I think someone here
said it best when they said "She can frame her way out of a wet paper bag."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
91. With a hyphenated last name she has to be liberal. No? nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
23. I mentioned this on another thread and got trounced. Someone
said, 'so you prefer the republican?' which didn't make sense at all in context. some people need help. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 04:06 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Some here think DWS shits rainbows because she goes on TV a lot and talks a good game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #24
29. One could say the same thing about Anthony Weiner. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #29
70. How so? Examples? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #70
73. Here:
Weiner has no similar cover. And he really has himself to blame. In 13 years in the House, he’s developed a reputation as a showman who’s uninterested in hard work -- or in cooperation. For the first decade or so of his tenure, he focused more on New York City politics than on the national scene, positioning himself for a mayoral bid. Only in the last few years, when his planned 2009 campaign for mayor was ruined by Michael Bloomberg’s campaign to overturn the city’s term limits law, did Weiner become a prominent figure in Washington, mainly through colorful House floor speeches and appearances on cable news.

But this new profile irked his colleagues, even those who should have been his allies. For instance, Weiner made lots of noise advocating a single payer program during the 2009 and 2010 healthcare debate. But his crusade did not go over well with longtime single payer advocates in the House, who concluded that he was more interested in using the issue to make himself more appealing to liberal voters than in actually making progress on it. As the Washington Post’s Jason Horowitz reported last week:

"Anthony wanted to go to the House floor to present a single-payer bill," Waxman said in an interview.

That was shocking news for some of his liberal colleagues in the House, who said they had worked for years on single payer without hearing a peep from him. It was also unwelcome.

"To call a vote in that environment would have damaged single payer for the future," said one representative involved in the negotiations. "We were trying to protect it from a vote because we saw the handwriting on the wall."

In other words, while Weiner plays a progressive hero on television, most progressives in the House see him as something quite different -- and aren’t about to invest whatever clout they have in defending him.


And there's more at the link:

http://www.salon.com/news/anthony_weiner_dny/index.html?story=/politics/war_room/2011/06/13/weiner_selective_outrage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #73
74. "Weiner made lots of noise advocating a single payer program"
Edited on Tue Jun-14-11 03:42 PM by cui bono
He's fighting for the people with progressive ideas. He comes off as very progressive to me.

I see what you're saying to some extent but it's not the same thing that was said about DWS. He's not betraying his public words by going after other progressives and he fights for what he says on TV. He says the same stuff on the house floor. It would be nice to know that he works well with others though.

Whether he's likable or not is not my concern. Obama is likable but he's not progressive by a long shot so he's not doing a good job for me. In fact, he talks a good game but his policies are republican. I'm concerned with what policies people put forth and support.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #74
76. He grandstanded to make himself look like a hero, while
screwing up the chances of it being passed. Doesn't sound like a progressive hero to me.

If this guy is such a progressive lion, how come we've only heard anything from him in the past few years, when his dreams of being NY mayor were postponed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #76
83. Screwed up chances of what being passed? And how?
I don't mind his ambition if he's fighting for what's right. That's a plus. But as I said before, I'd like it better if his colleagues felt he was working with them. I still don't think it's the same thing.

I haven't heard him publicly calling for one of the best progressive fighters out there to resign.

Still interested to know what he screwed up and how though.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #83
109. read the salon piece
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #73
99. Spin cycle off. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #24
93. Not an image I wanted, but you do express it accurately.
(I'll NEVER look at "Rainbow Brite" in quite the same way after that, though.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. That's one of the standard replies to heresy here,
along with:

1. He doesn't have a magic wand!
2. You never really supported the president!
3. You didn't listen during the campaign! and
4. Thank you for your concern!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #23
95. You could have replied "no...SHE prefers the Republicans!"
n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 05:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
25. Here's what I'll say about her.
I'm done with her.

I don't want candidates that are acceptable to the GOP and their corporate allies.

Moving to the 'right' isn't going to help her in the eyes of the the people in the following polls.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dotymed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #25
55. HELL, OUR PRESIDENT
Is to the RIGHT OF RICHARD NIXON and he is a Democrat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
32. Raul Garcia lost almost every precinct in the city he had been Mayor of
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #32
64. I don't know who Raul Garcia is, but Raul Martinez won 42% of the
vote with no money and the DCCC "Red to Blue" chair working for Lincoln Diaz-Balart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #64
68. Martinez raised and spent over $1.8 million and lost by 16% of the vote
And Debbie Wasserman Schultz did not work for Diaz-Balart. That is not true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. No kidding. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. with leadership like this
it is no suprise when we lose
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. An unfortunate fact for many, I'm afraid.
Floridians who are paying attention, especially, have known about this state of affairs for a good while now.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Yep, I've been posting about DWS's dirty deeds here for a while and have gotten lambasted every time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #10
44. Not from me...She is no friend to the progressives that's for sure...
...and I still haven't forgiven her for her behaviour during the primary '08 campaign
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
78. +1000
And this is why I remain a NPA in this state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. Not to mention her overt double-dealing during the primaries...
Team Clinton with no pretense at fairness
of the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
12. She needs to put a sock in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
13. K&R Too bad she was selected as Chair
Edited on Mon Jun-13-11 11:09 PM by Mimosa
I knew what she's like. I was depressed when she was selected to be in charge of the party. Her TV style is quite unpleasant too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
14. I didn't realize how deep this went until I read your OP
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
15. She has never been a progressive....
she, and my old friend, the defeated FLA one term Congressperson, Ron Klien, take the Democrat party because if they ran as republicans in the primary they couldn't get elected...

Ron lost to bannano Wacko Allen West and Ron tried hard to get on the right side of West...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. The South FL politicians (The lot of them) are pretty much awful....
Edited on Mon Jun-13-11 11:43 PM by FLAprogressive
....coincidentally, so are the ones in the rest of the state ('cept Alan Grayson). LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. No disagreement there. I am in the gerrymandered district from
Hell. Slices through 7 counties to get a GOP majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. Rooney's?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #20
62. Sutherland's. What a T-Baggin' fool he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #15
71. She did little to help Ron Klein, and I don't understand it. She's a firebrand
when she wants to be, though. I like her much better than Kaine, who looks like he'll run against George "Macaca" Allen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liquorice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
18. I like her, and I don't entirely believe the Tudor story went down the way he says it did. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. Wow, a record amount of time before a "DWS can do no wrong" post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. dupe
Edited on Tue Jun-14-11 12:45 AM by FLAprogressive
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
19. Debbie DINO? Nothing surprises me. To believe I was wild about her
when she starated out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
disillusioned73 Donating Member (963 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
26. The more I here/see from her - the less I likey..
I'll give her some credit - so far she hasn't been an MIA DNC chair, like the last one. But she handled this fake controversy so poorly..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
28. When it comes to Weiners she can whip one out quick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Puglover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
30. Oh you noticed that too?
Charlie Pierce just said it best on Stephanie Miller. Democrats (including Obama) need to now shut up. They are the ones driving this. When it comes to throwing their own under the bus they are beyond contempt. And Wasserman is one of the worst of the bunch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCaliDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. Couldn't agree with you more! And I'm a Pug Lover, too!
I'm so sick and tired of a Democratic Party that isn't a Democratic Party anymore. I'm totally disenchanted with how they've handled the Anthony Weiner situation, or the economy, or health care reform, or the wars, or unemployment, or Rep. Grayson (lack of support), or the Cuban embargo, or holding law-breaking lawmakers to account, or that going after Charlie Rangel (must've been DWS behind the scenes), or the environment...on and on and on.

Sometimes it feels as if the Republicans are still in control. I would even venture to say, even with a Democrat in the WH and a Democratic majority in the Senate, they still are.

Yes, the Dems need to shut up now and get to work - and by work, I don't mean the Republicans' dirty work!

Oh, and I have two pugs. 1 8-year-old named Harley (given to us when he was 3 because his former family didn't like the shedding in their $2 million dollar home), and 1 1 1/2-year-old black pug named, Elvis. And a Chow chow who's alpha female.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Puglover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #34
60. Aren't they wonderful dogs? A wee needy but a good needy.
And your friends can have their 2 million dollar pugless home. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCaliDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-11 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #60
111. They are wonderful! Sometimes they're so human, even. lol
And those people aren't friends. They're clients, and it's their loss! My Harlequins is a true clown, and i can't think of ever being without my Big Boy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #34
100. +1...and by the by, pugs have never lost control of
any part of government. Bluedogs and DINO's like 0 and DWS are the aces up their sleeve to do their dirty work and to make fascism more palatable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCaliDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-11 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #100
112. It looks like you're being proven right, ooglymoogly. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swilton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #30
67. And from a third pug lover
(with two right here on my lap) -
It really says something about the Democratic Party that she is its chair. Should we be surprised.

I always mistrust those who are so quick with the sound-bites - and that is all there is with her - a sharp tongue quick with the come-backs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
31. She lost me during the primary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
certainot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
35. going after wiener when 1000 RW radio stations get your back nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
36. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #36
40. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #40
46. Wow....I didn't expect that. Thx. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Puglover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #36
59. I'll be happy to respond to your post.
And if it earns me a spot on your ignore list so be it. But please, would you link to a post that says it's Wassermans fault that Wiener showed his weiner? Cause I don't see one.

Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #36
65. She isn't being blamed for the pictures but her reaction to them.
That would be in the wheelhouse of her control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
37. Thanks for posting that
Every time I see her on TV, that post pops in my head, but I couldn't remember the details.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
38. She may not be perfect, but I'd take 435 Debbie Wasserman-Schultz's over some people in congress.
She is a great advocate for the Democratic party. I wasn't a Hillary supporter, but she did a terrific job for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #38
47. Yeah, that worked out real good
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
39. I don't see any facts there. No reliable sources cited quoting Schultz.
I see only a one-sided view of a situation from someone who lost a race who is blaming the Dem. Party in part. That is par for the course. Doesn't mean it's not true. But that is a far cry from citing a reliable source that has a quote from Schultz on the matter.

I thought progressives were more discerning than that. I mean, we've seen this tactic used at Faux News for years. They don't cite facts; they quote someone who is purportedly a victim, and take everything that person says as fact.

I'll google this and see for myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #39
43. Shulz was on teevee saying Weiner needed to go...
...not sure how much clearer that needed to be..??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #39
45. There's too much to even get in one post. Just on one point,
from her Wiki entry:

On CBS's Face the Nation, she declared Sarah Palin to be unready for the Vice Presidency. “She knows nothing.... Quite honestly, the interview I saw and that Americans saw on Thursday and Friday was similar to when I didn’t read a book in high school and had to read the Cliff’s Notes and phone in my report,” Wasserman Schultz said of Palin’s interview with ABC’s Charlie Gibson last week. “She’s Cliff-noted her performance so far.” Wasserman Schultz was also named a co-chair of the Democratic Party's Red to Blue congressional campaign group.<21> Controversy arose in March 2008 when she announced that she would be unable to campaign against South Florida Republican representatives Lincoln Diaz-Balart, Mario Diaz-Balart and Ileana Ros-Lehtinenbecause of her good friendship with them.<22> Wasserman Schultz aThend Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL) are both on the LGBT Equality Caucus of which Wasserman Schultz is the Vice Chair.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debbie_Wasserman_Schultz


* * *

Two of the most corrupt, virulent RW hawks in the state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #39
81. This Floridian doesn't need the Googlz to show her what side DWS stands on.
Floridians here have been warning about her for YEARS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
42. Very true....we jumped out of the frying pan and into the fire with the Kaine/Wasserman-Shulz change
Edited on Tue Jun-14-11 11:50 AM by truebrit71
...at the head of the DNC...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #42
49. The democratic party has right wingers in the party and a lot of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
48. I can't stand The Queen of the Vampires. She's the ultimate faux Democrat--pure DLC.
BUT, I have to say that Weiner deserves everything he's getting. I loved the guy when he was railing against the wars and for the PO and for Medicare/Social Security and for the Impeachment of Clarence Thomas, but how ARROGANT can someone be and still expect to have any respectability left? He's dug this grave for himself. Sure, Debbie will push him in, but he's been on the edge on his tiptoes ever since he decided to be Mr. Internet Exhibitionist.

Weiner could have been a HUGE plus for the Democratic party and for progressives but he CHOSE to be an arrogant, shortsighted dipshit. It's time for him to go and take the spotlight off of his idiocy.

Meanwhile, this coming election cycle, no dollars for Democrats from me unless they go directly to the campaign coffers of SOLID PROGRESSIVE DEMOCRATS. Not one red cent for Debbarella and her crew at the DNC.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #48
87. She wants Weiner to go, but worked AGAINST us doing impeachment of REAL criminals in office!
Edited on Tue Jun-14-11 06:04 PM by cascadiance
There were many instances of her being vocal against impeachment of Bush and Cheney... Why can't these DLC types go after Republicans with the same fervor that they want to out progressive Dems?

Listen to Ed Schultz's interviews with her on impeachment of Cheney from back in 2007...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzqpN58PgqY - Part 1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxopFcWjxtA - Part 2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #87
107. I remember when Kucinich finally got the House to hold a hearing on the possibility
of impeaching Bush and Cheney. Vampirella was doing her damndest to make sure no impeachment proceeding moved forward.

Watching Kucinich and Tammy Baldwin and several other strong impeachment advocates was so heartening, then we got Debbie DLC and her song and dance. She's disgusting.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nankerphelge Donating Member (995 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #48
108. Only post in the lot that calls it correctly
Weiner has no one but himself to blame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neoralme Donating Member (812 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
50. I can't stand Debbie DINO. She needs to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blackspade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
51. I'm definately not suprised.
She is even more 'republican' than Tim Kaine.

I'm so missing Howard Dean.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
52. A "Reagan Democrat"... is the nicest thing I can say about her.
DINO

If you believe that the Democratic Party is Too Liberal,
then Wasserman-Schultz is perfect for you.


"There are forces within the Democratic Party who want us to sound like kinder, gentler Republicans.
I want a party that will stand up for working Americans."
---Paul Wellstone



"By their WORKS you will know them."








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avebury Donating Member (455 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
53. I am finally filing my paperwork to change my
voter registration to Independent. I am just as fed up by the Democrats as I am the Republicans and am sick and tired of them focusing their energy on sex scandals instead going after Clarence Thomas for intentionally filing false tax returns and having serious conflict of interests on health care legislation. I am fed up that they gave Bush and his gang a pass for lying us into the Iraq War and WMDs, approved the use of torture, and continued to give this country away to the uber-rich and Corporations while turning the mass majority of Americans into Serfs who exist to serve their masters. And they think that a sex scandal is more important?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
placton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
54. and, of course,
how Obama treats us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
56. Not a huge Wasserman Schultz fan but I agree with her on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
57. This was highly reported on DU during her last Congressional run and I don't know
why people don't get it. She is no friend to Liberals. Yet when she appears on tv and opens her mouth, it's as if flowers are flowing out for some people here, and I just don't get it.

I will often then point out in posts about her and those posts get ignored. It's easy to ignore the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
58. She bugs me.
It is evident that she is intelligent, and so I think her being more comfortable with republicans than with liberal or progressive Democrats is a conscious choice on her part. That's a shame, because if she was interested in advocating for democratic values, she could do a lot of good. Instead, she undercuts those Democratic values, and does the party a great deal of harm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cactusfractal Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
61. Debbie Whatshername-Shutup needs to do exactly that.
I worked for Doug Tudor in FL-12 in 2008. We had ZERO party support. Not a dime. The DCCC turned its back to us. With a coordinated media campaign funded with real money, we might've taken down Opie Putnam or at least cost him a bunch of cash defending his seat. Debbie likes Adam. Debbie can go %^&$ herself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
63. i thought she`d be ok as a spokesperson but....
i heard her answer a soft ball question and she stuttered and stammered...oh well,nothing surprises me anymore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
66. I'll stand up for Debbie W-S.
She was a HClinton supporter that showed nothing but grace when Pres O won the nomination. She pivoted and supported him unequivocally as the Democratic nominee. I have long admired her for that.

Both she and NPelosi made a judgment call on the AWeiner brouhaha that was perfectly understandable and commensurate with the conundrum at hand. I am in the Pres O camp on this, that it is ultimately up to AWeiner himself and his constituents.

But make no mistake, no Democrat takes joy in seeing AWeiner so compromised yet some are blaming everybody but AWeiner for his self-imposed predicament, and that doesn't pass the smell test.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #66
72. +1 N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
75. I have to laugh at people calling her a "DINO" as if they have a right to define who is a real
Democrat and who is not. I know that this particular forum is dominated by people from the left wing of the party, and that's fine. But remember that not all Democrats are progressives. This is a big tent party. And if we are going to start to say that only progressives are real democrats than we are going to lose a lot of elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #75
77. I have to laugh that progressives are shunned by the Democratic leadership.
We're called retarded, fringe, etc.

So laugh it up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #75
80. what tent are you talking about?
at least from the Dem leadership perspective, progressives don't have a place in that tent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #80
82. I don't know if that's true or not. But if it is then that means all the more that
Edited on Tue Jun-14-11 04:56 PM by totodeinhere
moderates are real Democrats. Remember that I was responding to a poster who called Debbie Wasserman Schultz a DINO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #80
86. The WH made that clear when we were told to STFU. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #75
84. This board is NOT dominated by the left wing, far from it. It is centrist at best.
One can easily look up a politician's record and see how they voted. One can easily follow a politician in the media to see/hear what they proclaim in public. One can easily read about a politician and find out even more.

Conclusion: Once can easily determine where a politician lies on the left/right spectrum.


When Dems start putting forth past republican policies that help corporations and hurt the general population they are not following the party platform and are not true democrats. The Dem Party is now centrist and the republican party is now extreme right. Progressives have almost no representation any more.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #84
96. GD:P is practically Republican. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #75
98. Too Easy! Compare their views/actions against the party platform.
:shrug:

We shouldn't let the "big tent" excuse all manner of sins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #98
101. If we used the parity's platform as a litmus test, there would be very few Democrats left.
The platform is written at the convention and then promptly forgotten.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #101
102. Certainly few non-conservative Democratic politicians, at least.
Some of us remember campaign promises. I guess the rest vote for the lesser of two evils. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
79. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
85. I concur...I'd take Wiener over a 100 Wasserman Shultz's any day of the week
Edited on Tue Jun-14-11 05:16 PM by ElsewheresDaughter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #85
88. +1
I like her to a point. But she does have that DLC connection that keeps me skeptical. I wasn't thrilled that she was selected to her newest position but wasn't surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
89. Not a fan. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
92. I still can't get my head around letting her have a job in the leadership
When she's protected Republican incumbents from Democratic challengers. Why would that NOT be an automatic deal-breaker?

It's not like she brings anything to the table that could ever make up for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
97. Except he's rabidly pro-Israel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #97
103. I don't see any contradiction between being pro-Israel and progressivism.
Progressives fall on both sides of that debate. And many prominent Democrats have been pro-Israel over the years. In fact if it weren't for Democratic President Harry Truman's support for the establishment of Israel it probably wouldn't have happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #103
104. I repeat... rabidly pro-Israel

There is a huge contradiction when you want to oppress innocent people in order to blindly support
a hostile government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #104
106. I'm sure that Rep. Weiner would not characterize his support for Israel in the way that you have.
And neither would I.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-11 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #106
110. And Weiner didn't send that photo... LOL

Read my link, then get back to me. Turning a blind eye to the facts doesn't solve anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #97
105. Wow. Thanks for the link.
Some very troubling comments from Weiner are contained therein. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC