Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WEINER MUST STAY -+- Josh Marshall: "I don't want Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY) to resign."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:04 PM
Original message
WEINER MUST STAY -+- Josh Marshall: "I don't want Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY) to resign."
Edited on Mon Jun-13-11 10:09 PM by kpete
Josh Marshall seconds it: Anthony Weiner must stay.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/post/happy-hour-roundup/2011/03/03/AGXJ1eTH_blog.html


Anthony Weiner, Anti-Hero
Josh Marshall | June 13, 2011, 3:00PM


For years I've made it a habit not to say people should resign their offices or not resign their offices. Not because it's a line I don't want to cross but because really at a basic level I don't care. It's just not on my menu of my concerns. But at this point, I think I need to make a confession: I don't want Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY) to resign.

...............

But c'mon. At heart it's still a BS story. I see a Member of Congress who's totally embarrassed himself. But as I tried to make clear to staff last week it's hardly a federal case. And his own constituents seem clear that they don't want him to resign. So somehow the apparently unprecedented simultaneous demands for his resignation from the Minority Leader (Pelosi), the head of the DNC (Wasserman-Schultz) and the head of the House campaign committee (Israel) just strikes me as a degree of pomposity and over-serious high dudgeon that has somehow managed the improbable effect of making his dogged desire to hold on to his office in the face of seemingly daily humiliation look better to me than their stern-minded and 'oh please!' inducing calls for him to cough it up.

So I'm not pro-Weiner but I'm definitely increasingly anti-resignation caller.

And I say this with full realization that today or tomorrow or a month from now something dramatically new may emerge that forces me to change my take on this and even feel a bit chagrined about sticking my neck out. But I'm not a time traveler. And based on what I know now, that's what I think.


the rest:
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2011/06/anthony_weiner_anti-hero.php#more?ref=fpblg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good for him.
Some sanity amid all the faux outrage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sportsguy Donating Member (389 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not Sure How I Feel About This
Edited on Mon Jun-13-11 10:08 PM by Sportsguy
But more and more, I think he should stay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. It is a BS story
Of little or no consequence. But it sure has riled up the mud-wallowers, eh?

I like the way Weiner has stood up against his attackers. He is showing real fortitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sportsguy Donating Member (389 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. A Spine?
Hmm, I like that.:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Spine is right
One of the few who are displaying it.

Anyway, the guy was just having some innocent fun. Not out to break laws or hurt anyone.
It's just a BS story. However.. everyone knows who he is now. He is really famous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. Then again, Josh Marshall didn't get unsolicited dick pics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. What if he had?
What if you got dick pics?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. If I got the dick pics, I would not mind.
Edited on Mon Jun-13-11 10:16 PM by originalpckelly
Then again, I'm a dickonnoisseur. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. So.. what's the problem?
Are you against Weiner because you were not on his list?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. No, it's just that I know that there are more sensitive people out there.
And I think this is basically like the internet version of flashing someone.

It's not all that bad, if truly accidental, but he meant to send it to someone who did not ask for it. It's sexual harassment of your customer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Sexual harrassment of a customer??
What does this: "customer" mean?

Aren't you blowing this way out of proportion? Pun intended.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. Nor did anyone else.
One went to the college student who was surprised since, as she said, they was anything illicet about their communications. She has now stated that she believes the pic was meant for another woman and has no problems with it. Her problems were with the stalkers from the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. I can't help thinking if he goes, that it will become open season on Dems...
Edited on Mon Jun-13-11 10:14 PM by hlthe2b
I mean, why not? If Breitbart and his gang of despicable stalkers are successful taking down (arguably) the most outspoken progressive in the House--after already managing to defeat Grayson, how damned energized will they be? There are consequences to this whole debacle that far outweigh one man's stupidity and crassness.

I go back and forth as to what is best-- for Weiner and most importantly, the people he serves.... But the political witch hunt behind this "sex scandal" with NO sexual contact involved is incredibly disturbing to me. Yes, his behavior is deplorable, but does it really rise to the level of destroying the man and removing the choice of elected representative from the people of his district?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. for some reason, I just thought of Paul Wellstone.
{shudder}
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Why?
Comparing a pervy Representative to a Senator who died unexpectedly in a crash? How did that come to be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #14
25. Both were out spoken progressives and they had to be taken out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. So Weiner really lucked out. Being hypnotized into tweeting a picture of your erect cock
sure beats being a passenger in a small plane that is forced to crash by a gamma wave generator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. so was it an inside job?
was weiner in on it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. That is a wise thought.
The last time I saw Paul on TV he was about to put the hammer down on big companies who were off-shoring profits while doing federal business. He had his enemies. Much the same as Tony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Every innocent congressman who sent unwanted pictures of his junk to college girls is at risk.
Oh, wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. Do you honestly think the RW is above manufacturing a scandal?
or finding some small issue that they can blow up with lies, innuendo, and the constant echo chamber? Really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Strawman argument. This wasn't manufactured, Weiner DID what he's accused of.
That's completely beyond question. Trying to turn it into him being "stalked" or "persecuted" is just trying to shift the responsibility off of him for the fact that he actively made an effort to show off his genitals to strangers on the internet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. He's 'accused' of having cyber sex, not even real sex.
Since when did we become the party of family values?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. No, the subject is the fate of OTHER prominent Dems...
and the repercussions from Weiner giving the RW their victory. It is not about defending Weiner and his wrongs, but it is a NEW precedent. No matter how reprehensible Weiner's acts (and they are), a congressman drummed out who did not actually consummate a sexual act, nor commit a crime, nor commit an inappropriate interaction with a child, nor misappropriate funds-- that is a new standard and may be just the start of where this goes. Rethugs will never acquiesce to this new standard, but knowing the Dems will, gives them great license.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #20
29. They certainly can - and they can make them up out of nothing
as they did with the birther and swiftboat issues.

However, that is NOT what happened here. Weiner did what he was accused of and Democrats for 10 days, based on his lies, argued that this was made up too.

Unfortunately, the right is using this to claim that Breibart is vindicated - and they are not saying he is vindicated JUST on this. The fact is that he has lied outrageously on the other things.

For a non-political example of what they are hoping, consider the National Enquirer. When the original NE Edwards story was posted, many - including me - simply dismissed it as the NE. More recently, when the NE has reported other things and people have objected to the source, the response has been that it was right on JRE. This ignores how often other stories were wrong.

I seriously resent linking the Weiner media coverage with the birther and swiftboat coverage. There is a HUGE difference. Weiner is quilty and brought this on himself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truth2power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. I said it on another thread. Breitbart is a bully. If Dems give in to his tactics
as many seem to be doing, he'll up the ante. Why some can't see that throwing Weiner overboard is doing Breitbart's work for him is beyond me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
30. season on Dems opened with ACORN and especially Shirley Sherrod
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
31. ++++ totally agree
you put it exactly as I think.

He needs to eliminate this behavior if he can (I think he finds it negative himself). BUT to destroy a career over it?--yes, the witch hunt aspect is grotesque.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LadyHawkAZ Donating Member (800 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. Ah, sanity- always a refreshing sight. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
26. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
27. K and R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
33. If I heard them all declaring that crooked Thomas should step down I might be more sympathetic,
but given that there seems to be two sets of rules for bad actions, I'm supporting Weiner staying in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC