Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Time for a re-frame? Republicans are "Pro-Birth" Not Pro-Life.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 12:25 AM
Original message
Time for a re-frame? Republicans are "Pro-Birth" Not Pro-Life.
Edited on Mon Jun-13-11 12:27 AM by jillan
Thumbs way up from me!

This is an excellent read that was posted on my facebook page...

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2011/06/12/the-children-republicans-leave-behind/

here's a snip - and it get's better, more convincing as it goes on:

In their crusade to change the United States as we know it, Republicans that claim to be pro-life are actually not so pro-life after all. They have constantly called abortion the mass murder of unborn children and yet, the Republican agenda being slammed through the US House of Representatives and Republican controlled state houses across the country will end up killing or harming more children around the world than abortion ever could.

According to USAID, 70,000 children around the world will die if Republicans make the cuts it wants to make. Approximately 30,000 kids would die from cuts in malaria control programs, 24,000 from lack of immunizations, and 16,000 due to unsafe birthing practices. Because of these draconian budget cuts, Republicans are essentially sentencing tens of thousands of children, both born and unborn, to certain death. That is NOT pro-life.

But Republicans are not through threatening the lives of children, both born and unborn. If Republicans have their way, kids will no longer be able to remain on their parents’ insurance plans until the age of 26 and pregnant women as well as breast and prostate cancer patients could be thrown off the insurance rolls. That not only puts unborn children and mothers at risk of dying, but also increases the likelihood of a child losing a parent. Republicans may not believe that they are harming children by harming their parents, but they are. Children can be affected emotionally and psychologically by the loss of a parent and putting pregnant mothers at risk will end up killing not only mothers but the unborn as well. That is NOT pro-life.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. republicans are pro-me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Yep! Thom Hartmann always talks about The ME society vs The WE society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. Not even pro-birth
No one who is pro-birth could make it so hard to safely have a child.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Pro Moment of Conception ? Republicans are heartless little people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. Pro fetus / Anti life
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojeoux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. They are Pro-Punish Women nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 02:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. I'd Call It "Forced Parenthood" — They Want to Force Rape Victims to Bear the Rapists' Children
Edited on Mon Jun-13-11 02:55 AM by AndyTiedye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wickerwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
8. They're pro-choice for me but not for thee.
Most of them aren't "pro-birth" in the sense that they don't want "those people" breeding and many of them aren't even anti-choice as they have had abortions in the past or wouldn't really hesitate to get one for their daughter if she was 13, pregnant and unmarried.

But they just can't pass up an excuse to feel superior to other women who are in a bad situation and need to get out of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 03:05 AM
Response to Original message
9. Anti-woman, Anti-choice, Anti-privacy n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
10. they are Anti Choice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lillypaddle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 04:32 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. That's it
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diane in sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
12. Forced birthers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmandaRuth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 06:09 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. yes. I don't know why we have to be
so nicey nice about everything. They represent the Forced Pregnancy movement.

Forced pregnancy is what it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frustrated_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 05:50 AM
Response to Original message
13. They're neither pro-birth nor pro-life.
They're in favor of their right to get to decide who lives and who dies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
14. The term "anti choice" has been around for quite a whie, and is perfectly suitable. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenichol Donating Member (198 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Yes, I quit using the term 'pro-choice' and ONLY use anti-choice
And if I have time, I also repeat the equation: No choice equals no freedom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
17. they aren;t pro anything- they are agaiinst reproductive rights and frredom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
18. "Anti choice" is, I believe, the accepted term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
19. You want a real re-frame?
You can't make slaves and indentured servants from aborted children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
20. Doesn't work for me at all.
Anti-choice. That works for me.
Not pro-life, pro-birth, not pro-anything other than pro-stupidity.
Anti-choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
21. They are "Forced-birth"...
...that is what they want to do: force women to give birth regardless of the circumstances, including pregnancy that is the result of rape or incest, fetal abnormalities or dire risk to the mother's health.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeMc Donating Member (636 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
22. 'Pro-life' between month 0 and 9
After that, not so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC