Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I've heard Lincoln was gay...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:13 PM
Original message
I've heard Lincoln was gay...
...And that Washington had slaves. And that Jefferson had at least one. Teddy Roosevelt wasn't your daddy's liberal. And yet they all wound up on a mountain...

FDR had a mistress, Kennedy was a womanizer, Carter fought a rabbit, and Clinton parsed words.

Wasn't a single one who was a super hero, yet each in his own way advanced America. Nixon was the villain of my youth yet he founded the EPA, went to China, and ended the Vietnam war.

I guess politicians are mostly neither better nor worse than you or I. I pride myself that among myself and my three siblings there were divorces but at least no friggin' beneath the sheets....Maybe the bigger ego it takes to get elected makes for bigger mistakes....

Let us please put all the nonsense to bed. Politicians have, for better or worse, signed on to run this country. People here are hungry and homeless and sick without care through no failing of their own. If Vitter came up tomorrow with a plan to aid our fellow citizens we should support him. If Craig were to plan to prosecute thieves in high places we should elect him to congress. And If Gingrich had a plan to revitalize our economy we should draft him for the Presidency.

But they don't. They are merely small men with foibles large or small. We need large men with great dreams and if we believe that what they say is what they will try with all their might to do, then and only then will they deserve our support.

In the coming race, the Republican contenders are small minded people. We will be presented with stories of rectitude without vision and virtue without compassion.

I'll take the human.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MyUncle Donating Member (798 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Whether or not any or all of the above is true, they were not ridiculed in their time..
Edited on Mon Jun-06-11 09:16 PM by MyUncle
When you are a politician, it is over when you are laughed at and the butt of jokes. Ask Sarah Palin, she is on the same bus as Weiner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. If that was true half the GOP would be unelectable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Carter was ridiculed in his time
and he didn't get re-elected.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Yep-exactly the same...
except I never said Weiner but merely pointed out we have larger problems than twitter photos. If laughing was enough than why are Newt and Rick Santorum back? I'm WAY past stains on blue dresses and losing money on real estate. I have things I want my country to be and personal flaws won't keep me from supporting actual liberals because they are human.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MyUncle Donating Member (798 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Newt and Rick are RUNNING, they will not win. PERIOD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marzipanni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
23.  Sarah could have saved a bundle
shoulda hitched a ride on the Wienermobile-

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. and why would it be an issue if Lincoln was gay?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. Quite so. However . . .
"Sinning" is one thing. Getting caught in a coverup demonstrates really bad judgement and rightfully ends political careers.

I insist that the politicians I support have good judgement, which is why I seldom find myself supporting Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. Nixon went to China, but he didn't end the Vietnam War.
That happened in 1975 when Saigon fell because the Congress cut out funding for it. Nixon and Kissinger negotiated a prisoner of war exchange.

And I think it would be cool if our greatest President in history was gay. Totally cool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. The last American combat forces departed South Vietnam in March, 1973. No fan of Nixon, but it's
undeniable that American involvement in combat operations ended on his watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. TY
And exactly on point. A monster and yet...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #13
25. He pulled them out years after he could have in order to get a ceasefire agreement with the North
That would make it so there was a certain amount of time between the withdrawal of US combat forces and the fall of Saigon. All of those dead soldiers just to save face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. My point was
That Lincoln MAY have been gay and it didn't make the slightest bit of difference. Except to Mary Lincoln who expressed no disappointment.My point was that almost any person may be perceived as flawed and that almost all will be a cause of disappointment if held to a standard of perfection from a "Christian" point of view. Jimmy Carter is held as a failure based on lies and innuendo and yet to my mind was the most morally pure President in my lifetime. At very least no extramarital rumor attaches to him. At most he works for world peace and builds houses for the disadvantaged...not a bad thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. I always feel politicians are a cross section of those that elect them. The good,
the bad and in between. I'm willing to bet most Americans would have a lot of embarrassing stuff revealed if they had the spotlight of MSM on them and their private affairs exposed, picture or not.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. Unrec for lumping "being gay" in with owning slaves. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Yes
Obviously that was my agenda...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. +1. Will it ever get better? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #11
24. +1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
12. Actually, he was quite melancholy. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pterodactyl Donating Member (415 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
16. Just for the record. Lincoln was not gay.
From what I've seen of the history, claiming he was gay is a stretch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Personally
I doubt it also. But he IS on Rushmore and I needed an accusation of non-Christian perfection and the "history" channel gave me one...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xfundy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. The concept of gay orientation arrived long after Lincoln's death.
In the 1890s, in Germany, I believe.

But, to you and the below from the OP, so what? Does not every woman have some masculine qualities, and men the same but opposite?

Guys are horndogs, and will get sex wherever they can get it, and every man and woman needs to spend some time with their own sex, socially or otherwise. This is natural, is it not?

The concept of homo- or heterosexuality represents black-or-white, binary thinking, which, of course, is antithetical to reality. Unfortunately, social "norms" force everyone to claim a point on an invisible scale, usually with no greys, let alone COLORS, considered. Thank you, Victorian Error.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
19. Carl Sandburg used the word "lavender".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
20. you shouldn't put being gay in the same as owning slaves or adultery and other wrongs or mistakes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
21. I don't want a hero
Edited on Mon Jun-06-11 11:51 PM by demwing
heroes fall

I want 150 million pissed off workers, each ready to stand toe to toe against a club weilding corporate fascist.

I wnt a fucking movement. I want an army.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC